Advertisement

Virchows Archiv A

, Volume 382, Issue 1, pp 95–111 | Cite as

The production of lesions in the rabbit kidney by xenoperfusion with fresh human blood

  • Pavel Rossmann
  • Karel Matoušovic
Original Articles

Summary

Kidneys of 12 heparinized rabbits were perfused with the fresh venous heparinized blood of two healthy human volunteers for 30 s, 1, 2, 5, 15, and 30 min. The renal lesion was investigated by optical, electron, and immunofluorescence microscopy. After 30-s perfusion the first signs of local human IgG fixation appeared, and after 1 min, positive staining for complement (C 4, C 3) was recorded. The intensity of fluorescence increased up to 2 and 5 min, and was strongest on the inner surfaces of arterial vessels. Weaker focal and segmental linear fluorescence was found in glomerular and peritubular capillaries. Anti-human-IgA and -IgM yielded discrete and sporadic fluorescence, while IgD, IgE, and C 1q were always negative. Anti-rabbit-Ig exhibited only vague fluorescence in the arterial adventitia and discrete linear positivity in glomerules, and reacted in perfused as well as in control non-perfused kidneys. Ultrastructurally, moderate focal platelet aggregation appeared after only 30-s perfusion. After 5 min the most striking feature was extensive disorganization with disruption of capillary and arterial and arteriolar endothelium and focal cell sloughing, without apparent topographic relation to platelet aggregation or leukostasis. The disruption of the endothelia and intracapillary blood elements became diffuse and massive after 15 and 30 min; in capillaries focal granular masses and sparse networks reactive with anti-human-fibrin and -fibrinogen appeared. Typical occlusive thrombosis was not found.

The most salient feature of blood xenoperfusion was immediate vascular fixation of human antibodies and of complement, with probable “classical” activation of the latter. Extensive endothelial destruction followed within several minutes. Man thus rejects xenografts as effectively as lower mammals.

Key words

Renal ultrastructure Immunopathology Renal xeno/transplantation Hyperacute graft rejection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alper, C.A., Rosen, F.S.: Complement in laboratory medicine. In: Laboratory diagnosis of immunologic disorders, pp. 47–68. Vyas et al. (eds.). New York; Grune and Stratton 1975Google Scholar
  2. Belitsky, P., Popovtzer, M., Corman, J., Launois, B., Porter, K.A.: Modification of hyperacute xenograft rejection by intraarterial infusion of disodium-EDTA. Transplantation15, 248–251 (1973)Google Scholar
  3. Berger, J.: Les composants précoces du complément dans les dépôts glomérulaires. J. Path. Biol.23, 483–486 (1975)Google Scholar
  4. Berger, J., Noël, L.H., Yaneva, H.: Contribution of immunofluorescence to the study of graft lesion. Presented at the 6th Internat. Congr. Nephrol., Firenze 1975Google Scholar
  5. Busch, G.J., Kobayashi, K., Hollenberg, N.K., Birtch, A.G., Colman, R.W.: Hyperacute renal allograft rejection in the primate. Am. J. Path.80, 1–20 (1975a)Google Scholar
  6. Busch, G.J., Martins, A.C.P., Hollenberg, N.K., Wilson, R.E., Colman, R.W.: A primate model of hyperacute renal allograft rejection. Am. J. Path.79, 31–56 (1975b)Google Scholar
  7. Busch, G.J., Martins, A.C.P., Hollenberg, N.K., Moretz, R.C., Wilson, R.E., Colman, R.W.: Succesful short-term modification of hyperacute renal allograft rejection in the primate. Am. J. Path.82, 43–60 (1976)Google Scholar
  8. Chaussy, C., Hammer, C., von Scheel, J., Pielsticker, K., Sollinger, H.W., Pfeifer, K.J., Pongratz, H., Brendel, W.: Xenogeneic skin and kidney transplant in closely related canine system: fox-dog. Transplantation20, 150–154 (1975)Google Scholar
  9. Colman, R.W., Braun, W.E., Busch, G.J., Dammin, G.J., Merill, J.P.: Coagulation studies in the hyperacute and other forms of renal allograft rejection. New Engl. J. Med.281, 685–691 (1969)Google Scholar
  10. Colman, R.W., Habal, M., Hollenberg, N.K., Birtch, A.G., Busch, G.J.: Hyperacute renal allograft rejection in the primate. Am. J. Path82, 25–41 (1976)Google Scholar
  11. Dempster, W.J.: The nature of experimental second set kidney transplant reaction. Br. J. Exp. Path.55, 406–420 (1974)Google Scholar
  12. Dupont, E., da Costa, C.R.M., Dupuis, F.: Linear deposits on glomerular basal membranes of human stored kidneys. Transplantation18, 458–461 (1974)Google Scholar
  13. Fearon, D.T., Daha, M.R., Strom, T.B., Weiler, J.M., Carpenter, C.B., Austen, K.F.: Pathways of complement activation in membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis and allograft rejection. Transplant. Proc.9, 729–739 (1977)Google Scholar
  14. Filo, R.S., Dickson, L.G., Suba, E.A., Sell, K.W.: Immunologic injury induced by ex-vivo perfusion of canine renal autografts. Surgery76, 88–100 (1974)Google Scholar
  15. Forbes, R.D.C., Guttmann, R.D., Kuramochi, T., Klassen, J., Knaack, J.: Nonessential role of neutrophil leukocytes as mediators of hyperacute cardiac allograft rejection in the rat. Lab. Invest.34, 229–234 (1976)Google Scholar
  16. Friedman, R.J., Moore, S., Singal, D.P.: Repeated endothelial injury and introduction of atherosclerosis in normolipemic rabbits by human serum. Lab. Invest.30, 404–415 (1975)Google Scholar
  17. Kissmeyer-Nielsen, F., Olsen, S., Posborg-Petersen, V., Fjeldborg, O.: Hyperacute rejection of kidney associated with preexisting humoral antibodies against donor cells. Lancetii, 662–665 (1966)Google Scholar
  18. Klassen, J., Milgrom, F.: Studies on cortical necrosis in rabbit renal homografts. Transplantation11, 35–44 (1971)Google Scholar
  19. Light, J.A., Annable, Ch., Perloff, L.J., Sulkin, M.D., Hill, G.S., Etheredge, E.E., Spees, E.K.: Immune injury from organ preservation. Transplantation19, 511–516 (1975)Google Scholar
  20. Limas, C., Spector, D., Wright, J.R.: Histologic changes in preserved cadaveric renal transplants. Am. J. Path.88, 403–428 (1977)Google Scholar
  21. Lund, B., Sommer-Hansen, E.: Renal transplantation in rabbits — IgG deposits in allografts from recipients with lymphocytotoxic antibodies induced by multiple skin grafts. Acta Micr. Path. Scand.80, 391–402 (1972)Google Scholar
  22. Mejia-Laguna, J.E.M., Palomo, A.M., Biro, C.E., Chavez, B., Soriano, F.L., Cornejo, M.G.: Morphological study of the participation of the complement system in hyperacute rejection of renal xenotransplants. Am. J. Path.69, 71–78 (1972)Google Scholar
  23. Milgrom, F.: Role of humoral antibodies in transplantation. Transplant. Proc.9, 721–727 (1977)Google Scholar
  24. Moberg, A.W., Shons, A.R., Gewurz, H., Mozes. M., Najarian, J.S.: Prolongation of renal xenografts by the simultaneous sequestration of preformed antibody, inhibition of complement, coagulation and antibody synthesis. Transplant. Proc.3, 538–541 (1971)Google Scholar
  25. Movat, H.Z.: Silver impregnation for electron microscopy. Am. J. Clin. Path.35. 528–537 (1961)Google Scholar
  26. Mozes, M.F., Gewurz, H., Gunnarson, A., Moberg, A.W., Westberg, H.G., Jetzer, T., Najarian, J.S.: Xenograft rejection by dog and man: isolated kidney perfusion with blood and plasma. Transplant. Proc.3, 531–533 (1971)Google Scholar
  27. Müller-Eberhard, H.J.: Chemistry and reaction mechanism of complement. Adv. Immunol.8, 1–80 (1968)Google Scholar
  28. Perper, R.J., Najarian, J.S.: Experimental renal heterotransplantation in widely divergent species. Transplantation4, 377–388 (1966)Google Scholar
  29. Perper, R.J., Najarian, J.S.: Experimental renal heterotransplantation in closely related species. Transplantation4, 700–712 (1966)Google Scholar
  30. Pielsticker, K., Schilling, A., Aldenhoff, J., Land, W.: Untersuchungen zur hyperakuten Abstoßung xenotransplantierter Nieren (abstr.). Zbl. Path.115, 220 (1972)Google Scholar
  31. Porter, K.A.: Renal transplantation. In: Pathology of the kidney, pp. 977–1041. Boston: Little and Brown 1974Google Scholar
  32. Porter, K.A.: The effects of antibodies on human renal allografts. Transplant. Proc.8, 189–197 (1976)Google Scholar
  33. Reynold, E.S.: The use of lead citrate at high pH as an electronopaque stain in electron microscopy. J. Cell. Biol.17, 208–212 (1963)Google Scholar
  34. Rosenau, W., Lee, J.C., Najarian, J.S.: A light, fluorescence and electron microscopy of functioning human renal transplants. Surg. Gyn. Obstetr.128, 62–76 (1969)Google Scholar
  35. Rosenberg, J.C., Broersma, R.J., Bullemer, G., Mammen, E.F., Lenaghan, R., Rosenberg, B.F.: Relation of platelets, blood coagulation and fibrinolysis to hyperacute rejection in renal xenografts. Transplantation8, 152–166 (1969)Google Scholar
  36. Rosenberg, J.C., Hawkins, E., Rector, F.: Mechanism of immunological injury during antibody-mediated hyperacute rejection of renal heterografts. Transplantation11, 151–157 (1971)Google Scholar
  37. Rossmann, P., Jirka, J., Málek, P., Hejnal, J.: Histology and fine structure of necrotic renal allotransplants in man. J. Path. Bact.110, 177–189 (1973)Google Scholar
  38. Rossmann, P., Jirka, J.: Rejection nephropathy, pp. 93 and 174. Amsterdam: Elsevier-North Holland, and Prague: Academia, 1979Google Scholar
  39. Rowlands, D.T., Kirkpatrick, C.H., Vatter, A.E., Wilson, W.E.C.: Immunologic studies in human organ transplantation. Am. J. Path.50, 605–622 (1967)Google Scholar
  40. Schilling, A., Land, W., Pielsticker, K., Aldenhoff, J., Brendel, W.: Experimentelle Xenotransplantation in entfernt stammverwandten Speziessystemen — Interaktion humoraler Faktoren bei der hyperakuten xenogenen Abstoßungsreaktion im Ratte-Hund-Modell. Res. Exp. Med.165, 79–92 (1975)Google Scholar
  41. Spector, D., Limas, C., Zachary, J., Sterioff, S., Rolly, R., Sadler, J., Frost, J.: Perfusion nephropathy in human transplants. Presented at the 6th Internat. Congr. Nephrol., Firenze 1975Google Scholar
  42. Starzl, T.E., Marchioro, T.L., Peters, G.N., Kirkpatrick, C.H., Wilson, W.E., Porter, K.A., Rifkind, D., Ogden, D.A., Hitchcock, C.R., Waddell, W.R.: Renal heterotransplantation from baboon to man, experience with 6 cases. Transplantation2, 752–776 (1964)Google Scholar
  43. Sterling, W.A., Bryant, C.P., O'Hanian, S.H., Pierce, J.C., Lee, H.M., Hume, D.M., Weymouth, R.J., Seibel, H.R.: Evaluation of renal transplant recipients by immunofluorescent microscopy. Surg. Forum23, 263–265 (1972)Google Scholar
  44. Tourville, D.R., Kim, D.V., Viscuso, R., Jacobs, M., Schoen, S., Fillipone, D.: Anticipation of renal transplant failure by postanastomosis biopsy and immunofluorescence. Transplant. Proc.9, 91–95 (1977)Google Scholar
  45. Vassalli, P., Mc Cluskey, R.T.: The pathogenetic role of the coagulation process in glomerular diseases of immunologic origin. Adv. Nephrol.1, 47–63 (1971)Google Scholar
  46. Verroust, P.J., Wilson, C.B., Dixon, F.J.: Lack of nephritogenicity of systemic activation of the alternate complement pathway. Kidney Internat.6, 157–169 (1974)Google Scholar
  47. Ward, P.A.: The role of complement in inflammation and hypersensitivity. In: Inflammation, immunity, hypersensitivity, Movat (ed.), pp. 460–477. New York: Harper and Row 1971Google Scholar
  48. Watanabe, T., Tanaka, K.: Electron microscopic observations of the kidney in the generalized Shwartzman phenomenon. Virchows Arch. Abt. A (Path. Anat.)374, 183–196 (1977)Google Scholar
  49. Williams, G.M., Hume, D.M., Hudson, R.P., Morris, P.J., Kano, K., Milgrom, F.: “Hyperacute” renal homograft rejection in man. New Engl. J. Med.279, 611–618 (1969)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pavel Rossmann
    • 1
  • Karel Matoušovic
    • 1
  1. 1.Transplantation Research Centre of the Institute for Clinical and Experimental MedicinePraha-KrčCzechoslovakia

Personalised recommendations