Advertisement

Journal of the multihandicapped person

, Volume 1, Issue 3, pp 233–249 | Cite as

Acquisition and functional use of signing and writing in deaf adults with mental retardation through conditional discrimination

  • Akira Mochizuki
  • Kazuko Nozaki
  • Hiroshi Watanabe
  • Jun'ichi Yamamoto
Article

Abstract

Two deaf adults with mental retardation were trained to establish a stimulus equivalence among object, word, and sign through word-object and sign-object conditional discriminations for new vocabularies. The formation of the functional equivalence relations was tested both in an ordinal “tact” setting and in a “mand” setting. Results showed that: (1) the subjects could learn indirectly sign-word relations; (2) they could demand objects by writing and/or signing the name of objects without direct training of expression when the subjects took the role of the “demander.” Moreover, each subject showed a spontaneous change of expressive mode (e.g., signing to writing, writing to signing), when an incorrect object was offered. Also, as the “supplier,” each subject reconfirmed the requested object with a mode other than the demander's. These mode changes within and between subjects also represent the formation of a stimulus equivalence among object, word, and sign. The efficacy of the training in new vocabularies, by the combined use of conditional discrimination and the social behavior chain, was discussed for the deaf person with mental retardation.

Key words

stimulus equivalence conditional discrimination signing writing mand deaf adults with mental retardation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baer, D. M., Wolf, M. M. and Risley, T. R. (1968). Some current dimensions of applied behavior analysis.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 1: 91–97.Google Scholar
  2. Bonta, J. L., and Watters, R. G. (1983). Use of manual signs by developmentally disordered speech-deficient children in delayed auditory-to-picture matching-to-sample.Anal. Interven. Develop. Dis. 3: 295–309.Google Scholar
  3. Bricker, D. D. (1972). Imitative sign training as a facilitator of word-object association with low-functioning children.Am. J. Ment. Def. 76: 509–516.Google Scholar
  4. Carr, E. G. (1979). Teaching autistic children to use sign language: Some research issues.J. Aut. Develop. Dis. 9: 345–359.Google Scholar
  5. Carr, E. G., Binkoff, J. A., Kologinsky, E., and Eddy, M. (1978). Acquisition of sign language by autistic children 1: Expressive labelling.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 11: 489–501.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Carr, E. G., and Dores, P. A. (1981). Patterns of language acquisition following simultaneous communication with autistic children.Anal. Interven. Develop. Dis. 1: 347–361.Google Scholar
  7. Charlop, M. H. (1983). The effects of echolalia on acquisition and generalization of receptive labeling in autistic children.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 16: 111–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarke, S., Remington, B., and Light, P. (1986). An evaluation of the relationship between receptive speech skills and expressive signing.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 19: 231–239.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Danek, M. M., and Lawrence, R. E. (1981). The multiply disabled hearing impaired client: Implications for rehabilitation practice.J. Rehab. Deaf 15(3): 1–9.Google Scholar
  10. Duker, P. C., and Moonen, X. M. (1985). A program to increase manual signs with severely/profoundly mentally retarded students in natural environments.Appl. Res. Ment. Retard. 6: 147–158.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Felce, D., de Kock, U., and Repp, A. C. (1986). An eco-behavioral analysis of small community-based houses and traditional large hospitals for severely and profoundly mentally handicapped adults.Appl. Res. Ment. Retard. 7: 393–408.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Flathouse, V. E. (1979). Multiply handicapped deaf children and Public Law 94-142.Except. Child. 45: 560–565.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Halle, J. W., Marshall, A. M., and Spradlin, J. E. (1979). Time delay: A technique to increase language use and facilitate generalization in retarded children.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 12: 431–439.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Keogh, D., Whiteman, T., Beeman, D., Halligan, K., and Starzynski, T. (1987). Teaching interactive signing in a dialogue situation to mentally retarded individuals.Res. Develop. Dis. 8: 39–53.Google Scholar
  15. Kohs, S. C. (1920). The block-design tests.J. Exp. Psychol. 3: 357–376.Google Scholar
  16. Kopchick, G. A., Rombach, D. W., and Smilovitz, R. (1975). A total communication environment in an institution.Ment. Retard. 13(3): 22–23.Google Scholar
  17. McIlvane, W. J., Bass, R. W., O'Brien, J. M., Gerovac, B. J., and Stoddard, L. T. (1984). Spoken and signed naming of foods after receptive exclusion training in severe retardation.Appl. Res. Ment. Retard. 5: 1–27.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Mochizuki, A., Nozaki, K., and Watanabe, H. (1986). Acquisition of mand in deaf-retarded adults: A training program for the use of multi-mode expression.Commun. Dis. Res. 15: 133–145. (in Japanese with English abstracts).Google Scholar
  19. Mochizuki, A., Nozaki, K., and Watanabe, H. (1988). A time-delay operation for maintaining verbal requests by institutionalized deaf adults with mental retardation.Japan. J. Special Ed. 26: 1–11 (in Japanese with English abstracts).Google Scholar
  20. Nozaki, K., Mochizuki, A., and Watanabe, H. (1988). A survey of the possibilities of communication behavior in institutionalized deaf adults with mental retardation.Japan. J. Special Ed. 26: (in press) (in Japanese with English abstracts).Google Scholar
  21. Poulton, K. T., and Algozzine, B. (1980). Manual communication and mental retardation: A review of research and implications.Am. J. Ment. Def. 85: 145–152.Google Scholar
  22. Schaeffer, B., Musil, A., and Kollinzas, G. (1980).Total Communication: A Signed Speech Program for Nonverbal Children, Research Press, Illinois.Google Scholar
  23. Sidman, M., and Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm.J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 37: 5–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Sidman, M., Willson-Morris, M., Kirk, B. (1986). Matching-to-sample procedures and the development of equivalence relations: The role of naming.Anal. Interven. Develop. Dis. 6: 1–19.Google Scholar
  25. Silverman, K., Anderson, S. R., Marshall, A. M., and Baer, D. M. (1986). Establishing and generalizing audience control of new language repertoires.Anal. Interven. Develop. Dis. 6: 21–40.Google Scholar
  26. Skinner, B. F. (1957).Verbal Behavior, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  27. Spradlin, J. E., and Dixon, M. H. (1976). Establishing conditional discriminations without direct training: Stimulus classes and labels.Am. J. Ment. Def. 80: 555–561.Google Scholar
  28. Spradlin, J. E., and Saunders, R. R. (1984). Behaving appropriately in new situations: A stimulus class analysis.Am. J. Ment. Def. 88: 574–579.Google Scholar
  29. VanBiervliet, A. (1977). Establishing words and objects as functionally equivalent through manual sign training.Am. J. Ment. Def. 82: 178–186.Google Scholar
  30. Yamamoto, J., and Mochizuki, A. (1988). Acquisition and functional analysis of manding with autistic students.J. Appl. Behav. Anal. 21: 57–64.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Akira Mochizuki
    • 1
  • Kazuko Nozaki
    • 1
  • Hiroshi Watanabe
    • 2
  • Jun'ichi Yamamoto
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Developmental ResearchAichiJapan
  2. 2.Yoraku-SoAichiJapan
  3. 3.Keio UniversityTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations