Journal of Soviet Mathematics

, Volume 12, Issue 1, pp 86–96 | Cite as

Nonprojecting isotopies and knots with homeomorphic coverings

  • O. Ya. Viro
Article

Abstract

In this paper, new examples of nonhomeomorphic knots and links which for certain r have homeomorphic r-sheeted cyclic branched coverings are constructed. In particular, it is proved that the two nonhomeomorphic knots with eleven crossings and with Alexander polynomial equal to one, have homeomorphic two-sheeted branched coverings, and that knots obtained from any knot by the Zeeman construction with p-fold and with q-fold twist have homeomorphic r-sheeted cyclic branched coverings ifp=±q(mod 2r). The construction of examples is based on regluing a link along a submanifold of codimension 1 by means of a homeomorphism which is covered by a homeomorphism which is isotopic to the identity only through nonprojecting isotopies.

Keywords

Alexander Polynomial 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    E. Artin, “Zur Isotopie zweidimensionalen Flachen im R4,” Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg,4, Nos. 1–2, 174–177 (1926).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. H. Comway, “An enumeration of knots and links, and some of their algebraic properties,” in: Computational Problems in Abstract Algebra, Pergamon Press, New York (1970), pp. 329–358.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    R. H. Fox, “A quick trip through knot theory,” in: Topology of Three-Manifolds and Related Topics, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1962), pp. 120–167.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    C. H. Giffen, “The generalized Smith conjecture,” Am. J. Math.,88, No. 1, 187–198 (1966).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. McA. Gordon, “On the higher-dimensional Smith conjecture,” Proc. London Math. Soc.,29, No. 1, 98–110 (1974).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    J. Milnor, “On the three-dimensional Brieskorn manifoldsM(p,q,r),” Ann. Math. Stud.,84, 175–225 (1975).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. Kinoshita and H. Terasaka, “On unions of knots,” Osaka Math. J.,9, 131–153 (1957).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R. Riley, “Homomorphisms of knot groups on finite groups,” Math. Comput.,25, No. 115, 603–619 (1971).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    H. Schubert, “Knoten mit zwei Brucken,” Math. Z.,65, No. 2, 133–170 (1956).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    D. W. Sumners, “Smooth ℤp-actions on spheres which leave knots pointwise fixed,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.,205, 193–205 (1975).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    J. L. Tollefson, “Involutions on S1×S2 and other three-manifolds,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.,183, 139–153 (1973).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    H. F. Trotter, “On s-equivalence of Seifert Matrices,” Invent. Math.,20, No. 3, 173–207 (1973).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    H. F. Trotter, “Some knots spanned by more than one unknotted surface of minimal genus,” Ann. Math. Stud.,84, 51–62 (1975).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    A. M. Vinogradov and M. S. Kushel'man, “Generalized Smith conjecture in dimension four,” Sib. Mat. Zh.,13, No. 1, 52–62 (1972).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    O. Ya. Viro, “Links, two-sheeted coverings, and braids,” Mat. Sb.,87, No. 2, 216–228 (1972).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    F. Waldhausen, “Uber Involutionen der three-sphare,” Topology,8, No. 1, 81–92 (1969).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    W. Whitten, “Algebraic and geometric characterizations of knots,” Invent. Math.,26, No. 4, 259–270 (1974).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. C. Zeeman, “Twisting spun knots,” Trans. Am. Math. Soc.,115, 471–495 (1965).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    H. Zieschang, “On the homeotopy groups of surfaces,” Math. Ann.,206, No. 1, 1–21 (1973).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1979

Authors and Affiliations

  • O. Ya. Viro

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations