Climatic Change

, Volume 25, Issue 3–4, pp 289–317 | Cite as

Implications of climate change due to the enhanced greenhouse effect on floods and droughts in Australia

  • P. H. Whetton
  • A. M. Fowler
  • M. R. Haylock
  • A. B. Pittock


Potential impacts of climate change on heavy rainfall events and flooding in the Australian region are explored using the results of a general circulation model (GCM) run in an equilibrium enhanced greenhouse experiment. In the doubled CO2 simulation, the model simulates an increase in the frequency of high-rainfall events and a decrease in the frequency of low-rainfall events. This result applies over most of Australia, is statistically more significant than simulated changes in total rainfall, and is supported by theoretical considerations. We show that this result implies decreased return periods for heavy rainfall events. The further implication is that flooding could increase, although we discuss here the many difficulties associated with assessing in quantitative terms the significance of the modelling results for the real world.

The second part of the paper assesses the implications of climate change for drought occurrence in Australia. This is undertaken using an off-line soil water balance model driven by observed time series of rainfall and potential evaporation to determine the sensitivity of the soil water regime to changes in rainfall and temperature, and hence potential evaporation. Potential impacts are assessed at nine sites, representing a range of climate regimes and possible climate futures, by linking this sensitivity analysis with scenarios of regional climate change, derived from analysis of enhanced greenhouse experiment results from five GCMs. Results indicate that significant drying may be limited to the south of Australia. However, because the direction of change in terms of the soil water regime is uncertain at all sites and for all seasons, there is no basis for statements about how drought potential may change.


Climate Change Return Period General Circulation Model Greenhouse Effect Regional Climate Change 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Budyko, M. I.: 1980, ‘Klimat v Proslom Budustem (Climate in the Past and in the Future)’, Mysi Publishers, Moscow, (in Russian).Google Scholar
  2. Bultot, F. and Dupriez, G. L.: 1985, ‘Daily Effective Evapotranspiration from a River Basin’,Casebook on Operational Assessment of Areal Evaporation, Operational Hydrology Rpt. No. 22, WMO, Geneva, 80–103.Google Scholar
  3. Calder, I. R., Harding, R. J., and Rosier, P. T. W.: 1983, ‘An Objective Assessment of Soil Moisture Deficit Models’,J. Hydrol. 60, 329–355.Google Scholar
  4. Campbell, R., Crowley, P., and Demura, P.: 1983, ‘Impact of Drought on National Income and Employment’,Quart. Rev. Rural Econ. 5, 254–257.Google Scholar
  5. Climate Impact Group: 1992, ‘Climate Change Scenarios for the Australian Region’, Available from CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, Aspendale, Australia.Google Scholar
  6. Feddes, R. A., Kowalik, P. J., and Zaradny, H.: 1978, ‘Simulation of Field Water Use and Crop Yield’,Simulation Monographs, Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  7. Fowler, A. M. and de Freitas, C. R.: 1990, ‘Climate Impact Studies from Scenarios: Help or Hindrance?’,Weath. Clim. 10, 3–9.Google Scholar
  8. Gordon, H. B., Whetton, P. H., Pittock, A. B., Fowler, A. M., and Haylock, M. R.: 1992, ‘Simulated Changes in Daily Rainfall Intensity Due to the Enhanced Greenhouse Effect: Implications for Extreme Rainfall Events’,Clim. Dynam. 8, 83–102.Google Scholar
  9. Hansen, J., Rind, D., DelGenio, A., Lacis, A., Lebedeff, S., Prather, M., Ruedy, R.: 1988, ‘Regional Greenhouse Climate Effects’, inCoping with Climate Change, Proc. Second N. Amer. Conf. on Preparing for Clim. Change, Dec. 6–8, (Climate Institute, Wash. DC, 1989), 68–81.Google Scholar
  10. Hennessy, K. J., Fowler, A. M., and Whetton, P. H.: 1993, ‘GCM Simulated Changes in Daily Rainfall Intensity and Heavy Rainfall Events under an Enhanced Greenhouse Effect’, Preprints, Fourth International Conference on Southern Hemisphere Meteorology and Oceanography, Hobart March 1993, AMS, 199-200.Google Scholar
  11. Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., and Ephraums, J. J. (eds.): 1990,Climate Change, The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 365 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Houghton, J. T., Callander, B. A., and Varney, S. K. (eds.): 1992,Climate Change 1992: The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment, Working Group 1, Bracknell, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  13. Jaeger, L.: 1976, ‘Monatskarten des Niederschlags für die Ganze Erde’,Bericht Deutsch. Wetterd. 18 (139).Google Scholar
  14. Joy, C. S.: 1991, ‘The Cost of Natural Disasters in Australia’, paper presented at the workshop ‘Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation: Severe Weather Events’, Climate Impacts Centre, Macquarie University, NSW, Australia 13–15 May, 9 pp.Google Scholar
  15. Lynch, A. H.: 1987, ‘Australian East Coast Cyclones III: Case Study of the Storm of August 1986’,Austral. Meteorol. Magaz. 35, 163–170.Google Scholar
  16. McAvaney, B. J., Colman, R. A., Fraser, J. R., and Dahni, R. R.: in press, ‘The Seasonal Climatic Response to a Doubling of CO2 as Simulated by the BMRC Atmospheric GCM/Mixed Layer Ocean Model’,Geophys. Res. Lett. Google Scholar
  17. McGregor, J. L., Gordon, H. B., Watterson, I. G., and Dix, M. R.: 1993, ‘The CSIRO 9-Level Atmospheric General Circulation Model’,CSIRO Div. Atmos. Res. Tech. Pap. No. 26., CSIRO Australia, 89 pp.Google Scholar
  18. Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R.: 1985, ‘CO2 and Hydrology’,Advances Geophys. 28A, 131–157.Google Scholar
  19. Manabe, S. and Wetherald, R.: 1987, ‘Large-Scale Changes of Soil Wetness Induced by an Increase in Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide’,J. Atmos. Sci. 44, 1211–1236.Google Scholar
  20. Mearns, L. O., Schneider, S. H., Thompson, S. L., and McDaniel, L. R.: 1990, ‘Analysis of Climate Variability in General Circulation Models: Comparison with Observations and Changes in Variability in 2 × CO2’,J. Geophys. Res. 95, 20469–20490.Google Scholar
  21. Meehl, G. A., Branstator, G. W., and Washington, W. M.: 1993, ‘Tropical Pacific Interannual Variability and CO2 Climate Change’,J. Clim. 6, 42–63.Google Scholar
  22. Nemec, J. and Schaake, J.: 1982, ‘Sensitivity of Water Resources Systems to Climate Variation’,Hydrol. Sci. J. 27, 327–343.Google Scholar
  23. Nicholls, N. and Woodcock, F.: 1981, ‘Verification of an Empirical Long-Range Weather Forecasting Technique’,Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 107, 973–976.Google Scholar
  24. Noda, A. and Tokioka, T.: 1989, ‘The Effect of Doubling the CO2 Concentration on Convective and Non-Convective Precipitation in a General Circulation Model Coupled with a Simple Mixed Layer Ocean Model’,J. Meteorol. Soc. Japan 67, 1057–1069.Google Scholar
  25. Pittock, A. B.: 1975, ‘Climatic Change and Patterns of Variation in Australian Rainfall’,Search 6, 498–504.Google Scholar
  26. Pittock, A. B.: 1984, ‘On the Reality, Stability, and Usefulness of Southern Hemisphere Teleconnections’,Austral. Meteorol. Magaz. 32, 75–82.Google Scholar
  27. Pittock, A. B.: in press, ‘A Climate Change Perspective on Grasslands’, Proc. XVII Int. Grasslands Congress, February 1993, Massey University, Palmerston North, NZ.Google Scholar
  28. Preisendorfer, R. W. and Barnett, T. P.: 1983, ‘Numerical Model-Reality Intercomparison Tests Using Small Sample Statistics’,J. Atmos. Sci. 40, 1884–1896.Google Scholar
  29. Rind, D., Goldberg, R., and Ruedy, R.: 1989, ‘Change in Climate Variability in the 21st Century’,Clim. Change 14, 5–37.Google Scholar
  30. Rind, D., Goldberg, R., Hansen, J., Rosenzweig, C., and Ruedy, R.: 1990, ‘Potential Evapotranspiration and the Likelihood of Future Drought’,J. Geophys. Res. 95, 9983–10004.Google Scholar
  31. Robinson, D. K.: 1987, ‘Selection of Design Floods’, in Pilgrim, D. H. (ed.),Australian Rainfall and Runoff: A Guide to Flood Estimation, Vol. 1, The Institute of Engineers, Australia, Barton, ACT, Australia.Google Scholar
  32. Rosenberg, N. J., Bruce, A., Kimball, P. M., and Cooper, C. F.: 1990, ‘From Climate and CO2 Enrichment to Evapotranspiration’, in Waggoner, P. E. (ed.),Climate Change and U.S. Water Resources, Wiley, New York, pp. 151–175.Google Scholar
  33. Shuttleworth, W. J.: 1983, ‘Evaporation Models in the Global Water Budget’, in Street-Perrott, A., Beran, M., and Ratcliffe, R. (eds.),Variations in the Global Water Budget, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 147–171.Google Scholar
  34. Smith, D. I. and Greenaway, M. A.: 1987,Dam Failure, The Estimation of Direct Flood Damage, a Study of Queanbeyan, NSW, Working paper 1987/23, Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, ANU, Canberra, 53 pp.Google Scholar
  35. Stephens, G. L.: 1990, ‘On the Relationship between Water Vapour over the Oceans and Sea Surface Temperature’,J. Clim. 3, 634–645.Google Scholar
  36. Vinnikov, K. Ya. and Yeserkepova, I. B.: 1991, ‘Soil Moisture: Empirical Data and Model Results’,J. Clim. 4, 66–79.Google Scholar
  37. Wetherald, R. T. and Manabe, S.: 1988, ‘Cloud Feedback Processes in a General Circulation Model’,J. Atmos. Sci. 45, 1397–1415.Google Scholar
  38. Whetton, P. H.: 1993, ‘Assessing Possible Climate Change in the Australian Region’, Preprints, Fourth International Conference on Southern Hemisphere Meteorology and Oceanography, Hobart March 1993, AMS, 355-356.Google Scholar
  39. Whetton, P. H. and Pittock, A. B.: 1991,Australian Region Intercomparison of the Results of Some General Circulation Models Used in Enhanced Greenhouse Experiments, CSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research Technical Paper No. 21, 73 pp.Google Scholar
  40. Wigley, T. M. L. and Raper S. C. B.: 1992, ‘Implications for Climate and Sea Level of Revised IPCC Emissions Scenarios’,Nature 357, 293–300.Google Scholar
  41. Wigley, T. M. L. and Santer, B. D.: 1990, ‘Statistical Comparison of the Spatial Fields in Model Validation, Perturbation, and Predictability Experiments’,J. Geophys. Res. 95, 851–856.Google Scholar
  42. Wilson, C. A. and Mitchell, J. F. B.: 1987, ‘Simulated CO2 Induced Climate Change over Western Europe’,Clim. Change 10, 11–42.Google Scholar
  43. WMO: 1992,Simulation of Interannual and Intraseasonal Monsoon Variability, Report WCRP-68, WMO/TD-No. 470, World Climate Research Program, World Meteorological Organisation, Geneva.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. H. Whetton
    • 1
  • A. M. Fowler
    • 1
  • M. R. Haylock
    • 1
  • A. B. Pittock
    • 1
  1. 1.Climate Impact GroupCSIRO Division of Atmospheric Research, P.M.B. No. 1Australia

Personalised recommendations