Plant Foods for Human Nutrition

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 53–61 | Cite as

Effects of altitude above sea level on the cooking time and nutritional value of common beans

  • Ricardo Bressani
  • Carlos Chon
Article

Abstract

The present study was conducted with the objective to determine the effects of altitude above sea level, on the cooking time and nutritional value of common black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Three 100 g samples of theOstua variety were cooked at 8 individual locations, ranging in altitude from 0 to 2256 meters, in Guatemala, to establish water uptake and cooking time. The cooked samples were separated into cooked beans and cooking broth for chemical analysis. This included moisture, protein, lysine, tannins, total and enzyme susceptible starch, and fiber fractionation. The cooking liquor was analyzed for total solids, moisture, protein, ash and K. A 1200 g sample was cooked for the cooking time established previously, for biological testing of nutritional value,which included Net Protein Ratio (NPR), Protein Effciency Ratio (PER), and protein digestibility. Altitude influenced cooking time which increased from 78 min at 0 m, to 264 min at 2256 m. Final moisture content in the cooked bean was similar at all altitudes and there was a tendency to yield smaller amounts of solids in the cooking broth at higher altitudes. The increase in cooking time was significant. Bean water uptake at all times was significantly slower and smaller at ambient T, as compared to water uptake at boiling T, at all altitudes. Protein and lysine content were not affected by altitude, however, tannin and catechin were lower in cooked samples, as compared to the raw material. Altitude did not affect the content of these substances. Total starch and total sugars were higher in the raw sample, as compared to the cooked samples, but there was no effect of altitude. Enzyme susceptible starch (ESS) was lower in the raw sample as compared to the cooked samples, which contained similar amounts with respect to altitude. No change was observed in fiber fractions of the cooked beans. Likewise, the composition of the cooking broth was very similar between cooking locations. There was a small tendency to a lower protein quality, with respect to altitude, the effect of which was more obvious in the apparent protein digestibility values. Undercooking or overcooking at one location influenced protein quality values. The extended cooking time of beans at high altitudes, has important economic and environmental implications, since significant amounts of wood have to be used.

Key words

Common beans cooking time Effect of altitude Selected chemical components Nutritional value 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Flores M, García B, Flores Z, Lara MY (1964) Annual patterns of family and children's diet in three Guatemalan communities. Br J Nutr 16: 281–293.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Flores M, Bressani R, Elías LG (1973) Factors and tactics influencing consumer food habits and patterns In: Potential of field beans and other food legumes in Latin America. CIAT, Cali, Colombia. Series Seminars No. 2E, pp 88–114.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shellie-Dessert KC, Hosfield GL (1990) Implications of genetic variability for dry bean cooking time and novel cooking methods for fuel wood conservation in Rwanda. Ecol of Food and Nutr 24: 195–211.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Linares BS, de Bosque CM, Elías LG, Bressani R (1981) Características tecnológicas y nutricionales de 20 cultivares de frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris). I: Características físicas del grano. Turrialba 31: 1–10.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Deshpande SS, Cheryan M (1985) Water uptake during cooking of dry beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). Plant Foods Hum Nutr 36: 157–165.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Silva CAB, Bates RP, Deng JC (1981) Influence of soaking and cooking upon the softening and eating quality of black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). J Food Sci 46: 1716–1720.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hincks MJ, Standley DW (1986) Multiple mechanisms of bean hardening. J Food Tech 21: 731–750.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vindiola OL, Seib PA, Hoseney RC (1986) Accelerated development of the hard-to-cook state in beans. Cereal Foods World 31: 538–552.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    El-Tabey Shehata AM (1992) Hard-to-cook phenomenon in legumes. Food Revs Int 8: 191–221.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Diamant R, Watts RM, Elías LG, Ríos B (1989) Consumer utilization and acceptability of raw and cooked black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) in Guatemala. Ecology of Food Nut 22: 183–195.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bressani R, Elías LG, Valiente AT (1963) Effects of cooking and of amino acid supplementation on the nutritive value of black beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L). Br J Nut 17: 69–78.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Almas K, Bender AE (1980) Effect of heat treatment of legumes on available lysine. J Sci Food Agric 31: 448–452.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Antunes PL, Sgarbieri VC (1979) Influence of time and conditions of storage on technological and nutritional properties of a dry bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, L) variety Rosinha G-2. J. Food Sci 44: 1703–1706.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Official Methods of Analysis (AOAC). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 14th ed (1984). Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Price ML, Van Scoyoc S, Buter LG (1978) A critical evaluation of the vanillin reaction as an assay for tannin in sorghum grain. J Agric Food Chem 26: 1214–1218.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hurrell RF, Lerman P, Carpenter J (1979) Reactive lysine in foodstuffs as measured by a rapid dyebinding procedure. J Food Sci 44: 1121–1126.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Khan MN, Des Rosiers MC, Rooney LW, Morgan RG, Sweat VE (1982) Corn-tortillas: evaluation of corn cooking procedures. Cereal Chem 59: 279–284.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goering HK, Van Soest PK (1970) Forage fiber analysis. In: Agricultural Handbook No. 379. Washington DC, Agriculture Research Service USDA.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pellet PL, Young VR (1980) Nutritional evaluation of protein foods. The United Nations University, Tokyo, Japan.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hegsted DM, Mills RC, Elvehjem CA, Hart EB (1941) Choline in the nutrition of chicks. J Biol Chem 138: 459–466.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Manna L, Hauge SH (1953) A possible relationship of vitamin B13 to orotic acid. J Biol Chem 202: 91–96.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Quast DG, da silva SD (1977) Temperature dependence of hydration ratio and effect of hydration on the cooking rate of dry legumes. J Food Sci 42: 1299–1343.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Rodríguez-Sosa EJ, de Caloni IB, Cruz Cay JR, Feliciano JB (1984) Hydration and cooking properties of dry beans. J Agric Univ Puerto Rico 68: 259–267.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bressani R, García Soto A, Estrada LL, Sosa JL (1988) Preliminary study of the factors that determine nutrient composition of bean-cooking broth. Plant Foods Human Nutr 38: 297–308.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Rodríguez-Sosa EJ, de Colom SV, Parsi-Roa O (1984) Effect of processing on selected nutrients of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). J Agric Univ Puerto Rico 68: 45–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ricardo Bressani
    • 1
  • Carlos Chon
    • 2
  1. 1.Division of Food and Agricultural ScienceInstitute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP)Guatemala, CA1
  2. 2.Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología Agrícola (ICTA)Bárcenas, Villa NuevaGuatemala

Personalised recommendations