Climatic Change

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 169–180 | Cite as

Effects of climate on numbers of northern prairie wetlands

  • Diane L. Larson


The amount of water held in individual wetland basins depends not only on local climate patterns but also on groundwater flow regime, soil permeability, and basin size. Most wetland basins in the northern prairies hold water in some years and are dry in others. To assess the potential effect of climate change on the number of wetland basins holding water in a given year, one must first determine how much of the variability in number of wet basins is accounted for by climatic variables. I used multiple linear regression to examine the relationship between climate variables and percentage of wet basins throughout the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada and the United States. The region was divided into three areas: parkland, Canadian grassland, and United States grassland (i.e., North Dakota and South Dakota). The models - which included variables for spring and fall temperature, yearly precipitation, the previous year's count of wet basins, and for grassland areas, the previous fall precipitation - accounted for 63 to 65% of the variation in the number of wet basins. I then explored the sensitivities of the models to changes in temperature and precipitation, as might be associated with increased greenhouse gas concentrations. Parkland wetlands are shown to be much more vulnerable to increased temperatures than are wetlands in either Canadian or United States grasslands. Sensitivity to increased precipitation did not vary geographically. These results have implications for waterfowl and other wildlife populations that depend on availability of wetlands in the parklands for breeding or during periods of drought in the southern grasslands.


Groundwater Flow Soil Permeability Climate Pattern Wildlife Population Grassland Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Batt, B. D. J., Anderson, M. G., Anderson, C. D., and Caswell, F. D.: 1989, ‘The Use of Prairie Potholes by North American Ducks’, in van der Valk, A. (ed.),Northern Prairie Wetlands, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 204–227.Google Scholar
  2. Boyd, H.: 1981, ‘Prairie Dabbling Ducks, 1941-1990’,Canad. Wildlife Service Wildlife Notes. Google Scholar
  3. Cess, R. D., Zhang, M.-H., Potter, G. L., Barker, H. W., Colman, R. A., Dazlich, D. A., Del Genio, A. D., Esch, M., Fraser, J. R., Galin, V., Gates, W. L., Hack, J. J., Ingram, W. J., Kiehl, J. T., Lacis, A. A., LeTreut, H., Li, Z.-X., Liang, X.-Z., Mahfouf, J.-F., McAvaney, B. J., Meleshko, V. P., Morcrette, J.-J., Randall, D. A., Roeckner, E., Royer, J.-F., Sokolov, A. P., Sporyshev, P. V., Taylor, K. E., Wang, W.-C., and Wetherald, R. T.: 1993, ‘Uncertainties in Carbon Dioxide Radiative Forcing in Atmospheric General Circulation Models’,Science 262, 1252–1255.Google Scholar
  4. Cushman, R. M. and Spring, P. N.: 1989, ‘Differences among Model Simulations of Climate Change on the Scale of Resource Regions’,Environ. Manage. 13, 789–7995.Google Scholar
  5. Eisenlohr, W. S., Jr.: 1972, ‘Hydrologic Investigations of Prairie Potholes in North Dakota, 1959–68’, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 585-A.Google Scholar
  6. Golden Software, Inc.: 1991,Surfer, Version 4, Golden Software, Inc., Golden, Colorado.Google Scholar
  7. Grotch, S. L.: 1988, ‘Regional Intercomparisons of General Circulation Model Predictions and Historical Climate Data’, U.S. Dep. Energy DOE/NBB 0084.Google Scholar
  8. Henny, C. J., Anderson, D. R., and Pospahala, R. S.: 1972, ‘Aerial Surveys of Waterfowl Production in North America, 1955–1971’, U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Spec. Sci. Rep. Wildl. 160.Google Scholar
  9. Hogenbirk, J. C. and Wein, R. W.: 1991, ‘Fire and Drought Experiments in Northern Wetlands: A Climate Change Analogue’,Can. J. Bot. 69, 1991–1997.Google Scholar
  10. Isaaks, E. H. and Srivastava, R. M.: 1989,An Introduction to Applied Geostatistics, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson, D. H. and Grier, J. W.: 1988, ‘Determinants of Breeding Distributions of Ducks’,Wildl. Monogr. 100, 1–37.Google Scholar
  12. Karl, T. R., Heim, R. R., Jr. and Quayle, R. G.: 1991a, ‘The Greenhouse Effect in Central North America: If Not Now, When?’Science 251, 1058–1061.Google Scholar
  13. Karl, T. R., Kukla, G., Razuvayev, V. N., Changery, M. J., Quayle, R. G., Heim, R. R., Easterling, D. R., and Fu, C. B.: 1991b, ‘Global Warming: Evidence for Asymmetrical Diurnal Temperature Change’,Geophys. Res. Lett. 18, 2253–2256.Google Scholar
  14. Karl, T. R., Williams, C. N., Jr. and Quinlan, F. T.: 1990, ‘United States Historical Climatology Network (HCN) Serial Temperature and Precipitation Data’, Oak Ridge National Laboratory NDP 091/R1.Google Scholar
  15. Kiel, W. H., Jr., Hawkins, A. S., and Perret, N. G.: 1972, ‘Waterfowl Habitat Trends in the Aspen Parkland of Manitoba’, Canadian Wildl. Serv. Rep. Ser. 18.Google Scholar
  16. Larson, D. L.: 1994, ‘Potential Effects of Anthropogenic Greenhouse Gases on Avian Habitats and Populations in the Northern Great Plains’,Am. Midl. Nat. 131, 330–346.Google Scholar
  17. McCabe, G. J., Jr. and Wolock, D. M.: 1991, ‘Detectability of the Effects of a Hypothetical Temperature Increase on the Thornthwaite Moisture Index’,J. Hydrol. 125, 25–35.Google Scholar
  18. Meyboom, P.: 1966, ‘Unsteady Groundwater Flow near a Willow Ring in Hummocky Moraine’,J. Hydrol. 4, 38–62.Google Scholar
  19. National Wetlands Working Group: 1988, ‘Wetlands of Canada’, Sustainable Development Branch, Environment Canada Ecological Land Classification Series 24.Google Scholar
  20. Overpeck, J. T., Rind, D., and Goldberg, R.: 1990, ‘Climate-Induced Changes in Forest Disturbance and Vegetation’,Nature 343, 51–53.Google Scholar
  21. Poiani, K. A. and Johnson, W. C.: 1991, ‘Global Warming and Prairie Wetlands: Potential Consequences for Waterfowl Habitat’,BioScience 41, 611–618.Google Scholar
  22. Poiani, K. A. and Johnson, W. C.: 1993, ‘Potential Effects of Climate Change on a Semi-Permanent Prairie Wetland’,Clim. Change 24, 213–232.Google Scholar
  23. Sargeant, A. B., Greenwood, R. J., Sovada, M. A., and Shaffer, T. L.: 1993, ‘Distribution and Abundance of Predators That Affect Duck Production - Prairie Pothole Region’, U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Res. Publ. 194.Google Scholar
  24. SAS Institute, Inc.: 1988,SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina.Google Scholar
  25. Shjeflo, J. B.: 1968, ‘Evapotranspiration and the Water Budget of Prairie Potholes in North Dakota’, U.S. Geol. Surv. Prof. Pap. 585-B.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, J. B. and Tirpak, D. A.: 1990,The Potential Effects of Global Climate Change on the United States, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., New York.Google Scholar
  27. Stewart, R. E. and Kantrud, H. A.: 1971, ‘Classification of Natural Ponds and Lakes in the Glaciated Prairie Region’, U.S. Fish Wildl. Serv. Resour. Publ. 92.Google Scholar
  28. Winter, T. C.: 1989, ‘Hydrologic Studies of Wetlands in the Northern Prairie’, in van der Valk, A. (ed.),Northern Prairie Wetlands, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, pp. 16–54.Google Scholar
  29. Woo, M. K. and Winter, T. C.: 1993, ‘The Role of Permafrost and Seasonal Frost in the Hydrology of Northern Wetlands in North America’,J. Hydrol. 141, 5–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Diane L. Larson
    • 1
  1. 1.National Biological SurveyNorthern Prairie Science CenterJamestownUSA

Personalised recommendations