Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Three views of demonstrative reference

  • 209 Accesses

  • 23 Citations

Abstract

Three views of demonstrative reference are examined: ‘contextual’, ‘intentional’, and ‘quasi-intentional’. According to the first, such reference is determined entirely by certain publicly accessible features of the context. According to the second, speaker intentions are ‘criterial’ in demonstrative reference. And according to the third, both contextual features and intentions come into play in the determination of demonstrative reference. The first two views (both of which enjoy current popularity) are rejected as implausible; the third (originally proposed by Kaplan in ‘Dthat’) is argued to be highly plausible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bertolet, R.: 1980, ‘Demonstratives and Intentions’,Philosophical Studies 38, 75–78.

  2. Bertolet, R.: 1986–87, ‘Referring, Demonstrating, and Intending’,Philosophy Research Archives 12, 251–60.

  3. Biro, John I.: 1982, ‘Intention, Demonstration, and Reference’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research XLIII, 35–41.

  4. Kaplan, David: 1979, ‘Dthat’, in P. French, T. Uehling, and H. Wettstein (eds.),Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 383–400.

  5. Kaplan, David: 1989, ‘Afterthoughts’, in J. Almog, J. Perry, and H. Wettstein (eds.),Themes From Kaplan, Oxford University Press, New York and Oxford, pp. 565–614.

  6. McGinn, Colin: 1981, ‘The Mechanism of Reference’,Synthese 49, 157–86.

  7. Nunberg, Geoffrey: 1979, ‘The Non-Uniqueness of Semantic Solutions’,Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 143–84.

  8. Recanati, François: 1989, ‘The Pragmatics of What is Said’,Mind & Language 4, 295–329.

  9. Reimer, Marga: 1991a, ‘Demonstratives, Demonstrations, and Demonstrata’,Philosophical Studies 63, 187–202.

  10. Reimer, Marga: 1991b, ‘Do Demonstrations Have Semantic Significance?’,Analysis 51, 177–82.

  11. Reimer, Marga: 1992, ‘Demonstrating with Descriptions’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research’,LII (4).

  12. Sperber, Dan and Deidre Wilson: 1986,Relevance, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  13. Travis, Charles: 1989,The Uses of Sense, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  14. Wettstein, Howard: 1984, ‘How to Bridge the Gap Between Meaning and Reference’,Synthese 58, 63–84.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reimer, M. Three views of demonstrative reference. Synthese 93, 373–402 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01089275

Download citation

Keywords

  • Contextual Feature
  • Accessible Feature
  • Current Popularity
  • Speaker Intention
  • Demonstrative Reference