Plant Systematics and Evolution

, Volume 218, Issue 3–4, pp 245–256 | Cite as

Analysis of the genusZea (Poaceae) using polymorphic chloroplast simple sequence repeats

  • Jim Provan
  • Pat Lawrence
  • George Young
  • Frank Wright
  • Robert Bird
  • GianPaolo Paglia
  • Federica Cattonaro
  • Michele Morgante
  • Wayne Powell
Article

Abstract

We have used polymorphic chloroplast simple sequence repeats (cpSSRs) to analyse levels of diversity and relationships within the genusZea. Between two and nine alleles were found at 15 polymorphic loci and combining the data from these loci gave 32 haplotypes in the 37 accessions studied. Genetic differentiation between the two sections within the genus was calculated using theρST statistic which showed that ∼70% of the total variation was found to exist between the sections. A phylogenetic analysis based on theδμ2 distance metric showed a large split between the two sections and suggested multiple origins of modern cultivated maizeZea mays subsp.mays. The agreement of the phylogenetic tree with other molecular, morphological and karyological studies suggests that cpSSRs may have value in phylogenetic studies in plants.

Key words

Poaceae Zea chloroplast simple sequence repeats diversity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Buckler E. S., Holtsford T. P. (1996)Zea systematics: ribosomal ITS evidence. Molec. Biol. Evol. 13: 612–622.Google Scholar
  2. Cato S. A., Richardson T. E. (1996) Inter- and intraspecific polymorphism at chloroplast SSR loci and the inheritance of plastids inPinus radiata D. Don. Theor. Appl. Genet. 93: 587–592.Google Scholar
  3. Chin E. C. L., Senior M. L., Shu H., Smith J. S. C. (1996) Maize simple repetitive DNA-sequences — abundance and allele variation. Genome 39: 866–873.Google Scholar
  4. de Wet J. M. J., Harlan J. R., Grant C. A. (1971) Origin and evolution of teosinte (Zea mexicana (Schrad.) Kuntze). Euphytica 20: 255–265.Google Scholar
  5. DiRienzo A., Peterson A. C., Garza J. C., Valdes A. M., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. (1994) Mutational processes of simple-sequence repeat loci in human populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 3166–3170.Google Scholar
  6. Doebley J. F. (1983) The maize and teosinte male inflorescences: A numerical taxonomic study. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 32–70.Google Scholar
  7. Doebley J. (1990) Molecular systematics ofZea (Gramineae). Maydica 35: 143–150.Google Scholar
  8. Doebley J., Iltis H. H. (1980) Taxonomy ofZea (Gramineae) I. Subgeneric classification with key to taxa. Amer. J. Bot. 67: 982–993.Google Scholar
  9. Doebley J. F., Goodman M. M. (1984) Isoenzymatic variation inZea (Gramineae). Syst. Bot. 9: 203–218.Google Scholar
  10. Doebley J., Renfroe W., Blanton A. (1987) Restriction site variation in theZea chloroplast genome. Genetics 117: 139–147.Google Scholar
  11. Dudley J. W., Saghai-Maroof M. A., Rufener G. K. (1991) Molecular markers and grouping of parents in maize breeding programs. Crop Sci. 31: 718–723.Google Scholar
  12. Felsenstein J. (1995) PHYLIP (Phylogeny Inference Package), Version 3.57c., Department of Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
  13. Freimer N. B., Slatkin M. (1996) Microsatellites: evolution and mutational processes. In: Variation in the human genome. Ciba Foundation Symposium 197, pp. 51–72.Google Scholar
  14. Galinat W. C. (1971) The origin of maize. Annual Rev. Genet. 5: 447–478.Google Scholar
  15. Garza J. C., Freimer N. B. (1996) Homoplasy for size at microsatellite loci in humans and chimpanzees. Genome Research 6: 211–217.Google Scholar
  16. Gaut B. S., Clegg M. T. (1991) Molecular evolution of alcohol dehydrogenase-1 in members of the grass family. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 2060–2064.Google Scholar
  17. Gaut B. S., Clegg M. T. (1993) Molecular evolution of theADH1 locus in the genusZea. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 5095–5099.Google Scholar
  18. Goldstein D. B., Pollock D. D. (1997) Launching microsatellites: A review of mutation processes and methods of phylogenetic inference. J. Heredity 88: 335–342.Google Scholar
  19. Goldstein D. B., Ruiz-Linares A., Cavalli-Sforza L. L., Feldman M. W. (1995) Genetic absolute dating based on microsatellites and the origin of modern humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 6723–6727.Google Scholar
  20. Hahn V., Blankenhorn K., Schwall M., Melchinger A. E. (1995) Relationships among early European maize inbreds. 3. Genetic diversity revealed with RAPD markers and comparison with RFLP and pedigree data. Maydica 40: 299–310.Google Scholar
  21. Jarne P., Lagoda P. J. L. (1996) Microsatellites, from molecules to populations and back. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 424–429.Google Scholar
  22. Kantety R. V., Zeng X., Bennetzen J. L., Zehr B. E. (1995) Assessment of genetic diversity in dent and popcorn (Zea mays L.) inbred lines using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) amplification. Molec. Breed. 1: 365–373.Google Scholar
  23. Kato Y. T. A. (1976) Cytological studies of maize (Zea mays L.) and teosinte (Zea mexicana Schrader Kuntze) in relation to their origin and evolution. Mass. Agric. Expt. Sta. Bull. 635: 1–185.Google Scholar
  24. Lanza L. L. B., de Souza C. L., Ottoboni L. M. M., Vieira M. L. C., de Souza A. P. (1997) Genetic distance of inbred lines and prediction of maize single-cross performance using RAPD markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 94: 1023–1030.Google Scholar
  25. Maier R. M., Neckermann K., Igloi G. L., Kossel H. (1995) Complete sequence of the maize chloroplast genome — gene content, hotspots of divergence and fine-tuning of genetic information by transcript editing. J. Molec. Biol. 251: 614–628.Google Scholar
  26. Mangelsdorf P. C. (1974) Corn-Its origin, evolution and improvement. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  27. McClintock B., Kato Y. T. A., Blumenschein A. (1981) Chromosome contribution of races of maize. Colegio de Postgraduados, Chapingo, Mexico: 577.Google Scholar
  28. Melchinger A. E., Messmer M. M., Lee M., Woodman W. L., Lamkey K. R. (1991) Diversity and relationships among US maize inbreds revealed by restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Crop Sci. 31: 669–678.Google Scholar
  29. Michalakis Y., Excoffier L. (1996) A generic estimation of population subdivision using distances between alleles with special reference for microsatellite loci. Genetics 142: 1061–1064.Google Scholar
  30. Mumm R. H., Dudley J. W. (1994) A classification of 148 US maize inbreds. I. Cluster analysis based on RFLPs. Crop Sci. 34: 842–851.Google Scholar
  31. Nei M. (1987) Molecular evolutionary genetics. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Novak M. H., Dallmann G., Nagy A. H. (1996) Detection of genetic variability among W117 S-18 tetraploid inbred maize lines. Novenytermeles 45: 325–336.Google Scholar
  33. Phelps T. L., Hall A. E., Buckner B. (1996) Microsatellite repeat variation within theyl gene of maize and teosinte. J. Heredity 87: 396–399.Google Scholar
  34. Powell W., Morgante M., McDevitt R., Vendramin G. G., Rafalski J. A. (1995a) Polymorphic simple sequence repeat regions in chloroplast genomes: applications to the population genetics of pines. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92: 7759–7763.Google Scholar
  35. Powell W., Morgante M., Andre C., McNicol J. W., Machray G. C., Doyle J. J., Tingey S. V., Rafalski J. A. (1995b) Hypervariable microsa-tellites provide a general source of polymorphic DNA markers for the chloroplast genome. Curr. Biol. 5: 1023–1029.Google Scholar
  36. Powell W., Machray G., Provan J. (1996) Polymorphism revealed by simple sequence repeats. Trends Pl. Sci. 1: 215–222.Google Scholar
  37. Provan J., Corbett G., Waugh R., McNicol J. W., Morgante M., Powell W. (1996) DNA fingerprints of rice (Oryza sativa) obtained from hypervariable chloroplast simple sequence repeats. Proc. Roy. Soc. London, Ser. B, Biol. Sci. 263: 1275–1281.Google Scholar
  38. Provan J., Corbett G., McNicol J. W., Powell W. (1997) Chloroplast variability in wild and cultivated rice (Oryza spp.) revealed by polymorphic chloroplast simple sequence repeats. Genome 40: 104–110.Google Scholar
  39. Provan J., Soranzo N., Wilson N. J., McNicol J. W., Forrest G. I., Cottrell J., Powell W. (1998) Gene. Pool variation in caledonian and European Scots Pine (Pinus Sylvestris L.) Revealed by chloroplast simple sequence repeats. Proc. Rom. Soc. Lond. B 265: 1697–1705.Google Scholar
  40. Schneider S., Kueffer J.-M., Roessli D., Excoffier L. (1997) Arlequin Ver. 1.1: A software for population genetic data analysis. General: Switzerland Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
  41. Senior M. L., Heun M. (1993) Mapping maize microsatellites and polymerase chain-reaction confirmation of the targeted repeats using a CT primer. Genome 36: 884–889.Google Scholar
  42. Senior M. L., Chin E. C. L., Lee M., Smith J. S. C., Stuber C. W. (1996) Simple sequence repeat markers developed from maize sequences found in the GENBANK database: Map construction. Crop Sci. 36: 1676–1683.Google Scholar
  43. Smith J. S. C., Chin E. C. L., Shu H., Smith O. S., Wall S. J., Senior M. L., Mitchell S. E., Kresovich S., Ziegle J. (1997) An evaluation of the utility of SSR loci as molecular markers in maize (Zea mays L): comparisons with data from RFLPs and pedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet. 95: 163–173.Google Scholar
  44. Takezaki N., Nei M. (1996) Genetic distances and reconstruction of phylogenetic trees from microsatellite DNA. Genetics 144: 389–399.Google Scholar
  45. Taramino G., Tingey S. (1996) Simple sequence repeats for germplasm analysis and mapping in maize. Genome 39: 277–287.Google Scholar
  46. Valdes A. M., Slatkin M., Freimer N. B. (1993) Allele frequencies at microsatellite loci: the stepwise mutation model revisited. Genetics 133: 737–749.Google Scholar
  47. Weatherwax P. (1954) Indian corn in old America. New York, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Wilkes H. G. (1977) Hybridization of maize and teosinte in Mexico and Guatemala and the improvement of maize. Econ. Bot. 31: 254–293.Google Scholar
  49. Zhang J. H., McDonald M. B., Sweeney P. M. (1996) Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPDs) from seeds of differing soybean and maize genotypes. Seed Sci. Techn. 3: 513–522.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jim Provan
    • 1
  • Pat Lawrence
    • 1
  • George Young
    • 1
  • Frank Wright
    • 2
  • Robert Bird
    • 3
  • GianPaolo Paglia
    • 4
  • Federica Cattonaro
    • 4
  • Michele Morgante
    • 4
  • Wayne Powell
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cell and Molecular GeneticsScottish Crop Research InstituteInvergowrie, DundeeScotland, UK
  2. 2.Biomathematics and Statistics ScotlandScottish Crop Research InstituteInvergowrie, DundeeScotland, UK
  3. 3.IICDRaleighUSA
  4. 4.Dipartimento di Produzione Vegetale e Tecnologie AgrarieUniversità di UdineUdineItaly

Personalised recommendations