Advertisement

Plant Cell Reports

, Volume 16, Issue 5, pp 329–333 | Cite as

Chromosome doubling via tuber disc culture in dihaploid potato as determined by confocal microscopy

  • J. Mozafari
  • D. J. Wolyn
  • S. T. Ali-Khan
Article

Summary

The potential of tuber disc culture for chromosome doubling was investigated in somaclonal populations of four dihaploid genotypes and one tetraploid cultivar of potato (Solanum tuberosum). Laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) was used for rapid determination of the ploidy level based on the number of chloroplasts in stomatal guard cells of leaves. Factorial analysis of chloroplast number in 58 clones and two leaf types showed that somaclones were clearly divided in two groups. Clones with 5–7 chloroplasts per cell as observed in tuber derived diploid controls were classified as 2X (not doubled), while those with 9–14 chloroplasts resembled the tuber derived tetraploid controls and were considered 4X (doubled). A high frequency of spontaneous chromosome doubling, 42% – 50%, was detected in 3 dihaploid genotypes, whereas no doubling was observed in one of the dihaploids as well as the tetraploid cultivar Yukon Gold. Effects of leaf type on chloroplast number was also significant. The middle leaf showed significantly higher chloroplast number than the younger leaves.

Keywords

Laser Scanning Confocal Microscopy Guard Cell Ploidy Level Solanum Tuberosum Young Leave 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altmann T, Damm B, Frommer WB, Martin T, Morris PC, Scheizer D, Willmitzer L, Schmidt R (1994) Plant Cell Rep 13:652–656Google Scholar
  2. Boyde, A (1995) In: Wootton R, Springall DS, Polak JM (eds), Image analysis in histology: Conventional and confocal microscopy. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 151–196Google Scholar
  3. Butterfass T (1979) Patterns of Chloroplast Reproduction: A Developmental Approach to Protoplasmic Plant Anatomy. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Cardi T, Iannamico V, D'Ambrosio F, Filippone E, Lurquin, PF (1993) Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture 34:107–114Google Scholar
  5. Cardi T, Carputo D, Frusciante L (1992) Am potato J 69:1–12Google Scholar
  6. De Maine MJ, Fantes JA (1983) Potato Res 26:286–294Google Scholar
  7. Dickson EE, Anmuganathan K, Kresovich S, Doyle JJ (1992) Am J Bot 79:108–1086Google Scholar
  8. Fleming MLMH, De Maine MJ, Powell W (1992) Ann appl biol 121:183–188Google Scholar
  9. Hermsen JGTh, Ramana MS, Roest S, Bokelmann GS (1981) Euphytica 30:239–246Google Scholar
  10. Imai T, Aida R, Ishige T (1993) Plant Cell Rep 12:299–302Google Scholar
  11. Karp A (1990) In: Bajaj YPS (ed), Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry vol 11, Somaclonal variation in crop plant I. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 379–399Google Scholar
  12. Mattheij WM, Eijlander R, Koning JRA, De Louwes, KM (1992) Theor Appl Genet 83:459–466.Google Scholar
  13. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) Physiol Plant 15:473–497Google Scholar
  14. Sgorbati S, Levi M, Sparvoli E, Trezzi F, Lucchini G (1986) Physiol Plant 68:471–476Google Scholar
  15. Sonnino A, Iwanaga M, Henostroza A (1989) Potato Res 31:627–631Google Scholar
  16. Tosca A, Pandolfi R, Citterio S, Fasoli A, Sgorbati S (1995) Plant Cell Rep 14:455–458Google Scholar
  17. Wan Y, Petolino JF, Widholm JM (1989) Theor Appl Genet 77:889–892Google Scholar
  18. Wheeler VA, Evans NE, Foulger D, Webb K, Karp A, Franklin J, Bright SJW (1985) Ann. Bot 55:309–320Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Mozafari
    • 1
  • D. J. Wolyn
    • 1
  • S. T. Ali-Khan
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Horticulture ScienceUniversity of GuelphGuelphCanada
  2. 2.Agriculture and Agri-Food Canad Research CentreFrederictonCanada

Personalised recommendations