Advertisement

Journal of Cultural Economics

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 271–300 | Cite as

Understanding Hollywood's organization and continuing success

  • Keith Acheson
  • Christopher J. Maule
Article

Abstract

Integrated international marketing of films and related merchandise and close financial ties between distributors and roducers have evolved to cope with the risks of piracy, cost containment, opportunism, and revenue uncertainty. Our reading of the evidence is that this system has dominated because of its efficiency. In search of an explanation of why America remains the centre of this institutional and contractual web, we examine the impact of two world wars, the rapid commercialization of new technologies in the United States by aggressive managers, an open financial system and the ethnic diversity, language homogeneity, and size of the domestic market.

Key words

Film Hollywood risk management organization policy persistences 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acheson, Keith and Christopher J. Maule (1994a) “International Regimes for Trade, Investment and Labour Mobility in the Cultural Industries”.Canadian Journal of Communication 19: 149–69.Google Scholar
  2. Acheson, Keith and Christopher J. Maule (1994b) “Copyright and Related Rights: The International Dimension”.Canadian Journal of Communication 19: 171–94.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, Robert (1985) “The Motion Pictures Patents Company: A Reevaluation”, in T. Balio, ed,The American Film Industry. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  4. Bach, Steven (1985)Final Cut: Dreams and Disaster in the Making of Heaven's Gate. New American Library, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Boorman, John (1985)Money Into Light — The Emerald Forest. Faber and Faber, London.Google Scholar
  6. Borneman, Ernest (1985) “United States versus Hollywood: The Case Study of an Antitrust Suit”, in T. Balio, ed,The American Film Industry. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  7. Bowser, Eileen (1991)The Transformation of Cinema, 1907–1915, Vol. 2, History of American Cinema. Charles Scribner, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Chandler, A.D. (1990)Strategy and Structure, Chapters in the History of the American Industrial Enterprise. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  9. Cheung, Steven N.S. (1969)A Theory of Share Tenancy. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Cheung, Steven N.S. (1983) “The Contractual Nature of the Firm”.Journal of Law and Economics 17: 53–71.Google Scholar
  11. Chippindale Peter and Suzanne Franks (1991)Dished: The Rise and Fall of British Satellite Broadcasting. Simon and Schuster, Sydney.Google Scholar
  12. Coase, Ronald H. (1937) “The Nature of the Firm”.Economica 4, 3: 386–405.Google Scholar
  13. Coase, Ronald H. (1960) “The Problem of Social Cost”.Journal of Law and Economics 3, 1: 1–44.Google Scholar
  14. Coase, Ronald H. (1988)The Firm, the Market, and the Law. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  15. Conant, Michael (1960)Antitrust in the Motion Picture Industry. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  16. Conant, Michael (1985) “The Paramount Decrees Reconsidered”, in T. Balio, ed,The American Film Industry. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.Google Scholar
  17. Cunningham, Stuart and Graeme Turner, eds. (1993)The Media in Australia: Industries, Texts, Audiences. Allen and Unwin, St. Leonards.Google Scholar
  18. De Vany, Arthur and Ross D. Eckert (1991) “Motion Picture Antitrust: The Paramount Cases Revisited”.Research in Law and Economics 14: 51–112.Google Scholar
  19. Eberts, Jake and Terry Ilott (1990)My Indecision is Final: The Rise and Fall of Goldcrest Films. Faber and Faber, London.Google Scholar
  20. Fitzgerald, F. Scott (1941)The Last Tycoon. Scribner, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Goldman, William (1983)Adventures in the Screen Trade. Warner Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
  22. Gomery, Douglas (1976) “Writing the History of the American Film Industry: Warner Brothers and Sound”.Screen, 17, 1: 40–53.Google Scholar
  23. Gomery, Douglas (1986)The Hollywood Studio System. British Film Institute/Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  24. Hoskins, Colin and R. Mirus (1988) “Reasons for the US dominance of the international trade in television programs”.Media, Culture and Society 10: 499–515.Google Scholar
  25. Houghton, Buck (1991)What a Producer Does: The Art of Moviemaking (Not the Business). Silman-James Press, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  26. Huston, John (1980)An Open Book Ballantine, New York.Google Scholar
  27. Izod, John (1988)Hollywood and the Box Office, 1895–1986. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  28. Jarvie, Ian (1992)Hollywood's Overseas Campaign, The North Atlantic Movie Trade 1920–1950. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  29. Jowett, Garth S. (1990) “Moral responsibility and Commercial Entertainment: Social Control in the United States Film Industry, 1907–1968”.Historical Journal of Film, Radio and Television, 10: 3–31.Google Scholar
  30. Kent, Nicholas (1991)Naked Hollywood. BBC Books, London.Google Scholar
  31. Kenney, Roy W. and Benjamin Klein (1983) “The Economics of Block Booking”.The Journal of Law and Econmmics 21: 497–540.Google Scholar
  32. Knight, Frank H. (1921)Risk, Uncertainty and Profits. Houghton Mifflin, Cambridge MA.Google Scholar
  33. Limbacher, James L. (1971)The Influence of J. Arthur Rank. London.Google Scholar
  34. Macnab, Geoffrey (1993)J. Arthur Rank and the British Film Industry. Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  35. McAfee, R. Preston and John McMillan (1991) “Optimal Contracts for Teams”.International Economic Review 32, 3: 561–77.Google Scholar
  36. McClintock, David (1982)Indecent Exposure: A True Story of Hollywood and Wall Street. William Morrow, New York.Google Scholar
  37. McManus, John C. (1975) “The costs of alternative economic organizations”.Canadian Journal of Economics 8: 3.Google Scholar
  38. Musser, Charles (1990)The Emergence of Cinema: The American Screen to 1907, Vol. 1 of The History of the American Cinema. Charles Scribner, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Powdermaker, Hortense (1951)Hollywood The Dream Factory. Seeker and Warburg, London.Google Scholar
  40. Radner, Roy (1992) “Hierarchy: The Economics of Managing”.Journal of Economic Literature, 30, 3: 1393–1415.Google Scholar
  41. Rasmusen, E. (1989)Games and Information. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  42. Rosten, Leo (1941)Hollywood: The Movie Colony, The Movie Makers. Harcourt Brace, New York.Google Scholar
  43. Rosen, Sherwin (1981) “The Economics of Super-stars”.American Economic Review 71: 845–58.Google Scholar
  44. Salomon Brothers (1993)Interactive Multimedia: When Worlds Converge, The Transformation of Media, Technology and Communications, Salomon Brothers, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Staiger, Janet (1985) “The Hollywood Mode of Production to 1930” and “The Hollywood Mode of Production, 1930–60”, in Bordwell, David, Janet Staiger and Kirstin Thompson, eds,The Classical Hollywood Cinema: Film Style and Mode of Production to 1960. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Stigler, George (1968) “A Note on Block Booking”, in George Stigler,The Organization of Industry Irwin, Homewood.Google Scholar
  47. Thompson, Kirstin (1985)Exporting Entertainment, America in the World Film Market 1907–34. BFI Publishing, London.Google Scholar
  48. Trotiner, Glen (1984) “Coming to a Theater Near You: Movie Distributors Challenge Exhibitor Instigated Anti-blind Statutes”.Cardozo Arts & Entertainment 3: 155–179.Google Scholar
  49. Vogel, Harold L. (1986)Entertainment Industry Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  50. Williamson, Oliver (1985)The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms, Markets, Relational Contracting. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Wilcox, Herbert (1969)25,000 Sunsets. A.F. Barnes, South Brunswick, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Keith Acheson
    • 1
  • Christopher J. Maule
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Economics DepartmentCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Economics DepartmentCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Norman Paterson School of International AffairsCarleton UniversityOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations