Naturwissenschaften

, Volume 70, Issue 9, pp 451–461

Portrait of an Asian stalk-eyed fly

  • Ingrid de la Motte
  • Dietrich Burkhardt
Article

Abstract

Diopsid flies have eyes set on stalks which are in some cases so long that the distance between the eyes exceeds the body length. These conspicuous structures have given rise to much speculation about their adaptive value, but there are very few actual observations by which to judge these hypotheses.Cyrtodiopsis whitei Curran lives in the tropical rainforest of Malaysia. We describe a number of aspects of its morphology and biology, some functional properties of the eye, and the ritualized fights between males, by which harems are acquired. The evolutionary significance of the eyestalks is discussed: they represent structures subjected to a double selection pressure; they are an adaptation by which a sensory system is better matched to the special problems encountered in a densely structured habitat (in that the field of view is extended and the ability to estimate distance and size and to identify objects at a large distance is improved), also they act as key stimulus for species recognition and as releaser for intraspecific behaviour.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Shillito, J.F.: J. Soc. Biblphy. Nat. Hist.3, 337 (1960);8, 65 (1976)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burkhardt, D., Motte, I. de la: Encycl. Cinematogr. Göttingen, E 2668 (1981)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burkhardt, D., Motte, I. de la: J. Comp. Physiol. (in press)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wehner, R., in: The Compound Eye and Vision of Insects, p. 75 (Horridge, G.A., ed.). Oxford: Clarendon 1975Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fuessly, J.G.: Arch. Insekt,1, 6 (1781)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Descamps, M.: Bull. Sci. (Centre Techn. Agricult. Top., Ministère de la France d'Outre-Mer)7, 1 (1957)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Oldroyd, H.: The Natural History of Flies. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson 1964Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tan, K.B.: Thesis Univ. Malaya, Kuala Lumpur 1965Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Burkhardt, D., Darnhofer-Demar, B., Fischer, K.: J. Comp. Physiol.87, 165 (1973)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wickler, W., Scibt, U.: Z. Tierpsychol.31, 113 (1972)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Burkhardt, D., Motte, I. de la: Encycl. Cinematogr. Göttingen, E 2695 (1982)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scibt, U.: Z. Tierpsychol.31, 255 (1972)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Burkhardt, D., Motte, I. de la: Encycl. Cinematogr. Göttingen, E 2671 (1980)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shillito, J.F.: Novit. Zool.42, 147 (1940)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eggers, F.: Zool. Jb. Syst.49, 469 (1925)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McAlpine, D.K., in: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, p. 221 (Blum, M.S., Blum, N.A., eds.). London: Academic Press 1979Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hennig, W.: Beitr. Naturkde.145, 1 (1965)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borgia, G., in: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects, p. 19 (Blum, M.S., Blum, N.A., eds.). New York: Academic Press 1979Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fisher, R.: The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. New York: Dover 1958Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1983

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingrid de la Motte
    • 1
  • Dietrich Burkhardt
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für Zoologie der UniversitätRegensburg

Personalised recommendations