Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Correlations of achievement, completion, interest, and satisfaction for adult learners and reflections on the meaning of success for adult education

  • 46 Accesses

Abstract

This paper discusses two important movements in higher education during the last decade: empirical analysis of educational outcomes and expansion of postsecondary educational opportunities for adults. Evidence is presented that indicates that many of the findings relating educational outcomes to background factors may not be important for adult open-learning programs. A discussion of the correlations that were significant is included as well as possible reasons why more significant findings did not arise. The paper then argues for a wider view of outcomes and a broader conception of success. Categories other than achievement, completion, interest, and satisfaction are presented. Among the student and institutional outcome measures discussed are educational and career development, personal development, community impact, and development of new knowledge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brown, L. A. Learner responses to the use of television in UMA courses.Working Paper No.8. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Mid-America, 1975.

  2. Bryant, E., Glaser, E., Hansen, M., & Kirsch, A.Associations between educational outcomes and background variables: A review of selected literature. National Assessment of Educational Progress, 1974.

  3. Chickering, A. Adult development—implications for higher education. InDesigning Diversity '75 Conference Proceedings. Lincoln, Neb.: University of Mid-America, 1975.

  4. Coleman, J., Campbell, E., Hobson, C., et al.Equality of educational opportunity. National Center for Educational Statistics, Washington, D.C., 1966.

  5. Commission on Non-Traditional Study.Diversity of design.San Francisco: Josey-Bass, 1973.

  6. Faure, E.Learning to be. Paris: UNESCO, 1972.

  7. Gooler, D. Criteria for evaluating the success of non-traditional post secondary educational programs.Journal of Higher Education, 1977.

  8. Illich, I.Deschooling society. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.

  9. Knowles, M. Andragogy, not pedagogy.Adult Leadership, April 1968.

  10. Lenning, O., Munday, L., Johnson, B., et al.The Non interactive correlates of grades, persistance and academic Learning in college: The published literature through the decade of the sixties. Iowa City: American College Testing Program, 1974.

  11. Mayeske, G., Okada, T., Cohen, W., et al.A study of the achievement of our nation's students. Washington, D. C.: Office of Education, Department of Health, Education and Welfare, 1973.

  12. Micek, S., & Arney, M.The outcomes measures and procedures manual. Boulder, Col.: National Center for Higher Education Management Systems (NCHEMS), 1974.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

Much of this paper is based on an earlier presentation given at the AERA conference on correlates of success in nontraditional post secondary education in San Francisco, 1976. The author is particularly indebted to John Eggert for his substantive contribution and advice and council in the preparation of this paper. The University of Mid America (UMA) is Principally Funded by the National Institute of Education (NIE). The views expressed in this article do not necessarily reflect those of UMA or NIE.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Forman, D.C. Correlations of achievement, completion, interest, and satisfaction for adult learners and reflections on the meaning of success for adult education. Alternative Higher Education 2, 151–163 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079553

Download citation

Keywords

  • High Education
  • Social Psychology
  • Empirical Analysis
  • Significant Finding
  • Career Development