Advertisement

Social Indicators Research

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 277–289 | Cite as

Life satisfaction: A study based on the organization of personal projects

  • Ünsal Yetİm
Article

Abstract

A methodology about personal project was used to understand perceived life satisfaction. Variables derived from the Personal Project Matrix were shown to explain variability in reported life satisfaction in two separate studies (university and professional samples). The results indicated that personal projects of students had been organized in systems and these systems' properties had meaningful effects on life satisfaction. A cross-validation analysis revealed that professionals' projects did not show the same systemic feature which students' projects had. But some variables such as projects performed in general places, stress, and amount of reported obstacles discriminated life satisfaction scores meaningfully.

Keywords

Life Satisfaction Separate Study Systemic Feature Satisfaction Score Project Matrix 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bilgin, N., Yetim, Ü. and Gökten, M.: 1991, Searching a Democratic Modal for Local Governments: A Study Based on People's Evaluations of Their Residential Satisfaction, Life Satisfaction, and Political Participation (In Turkish) (The Social Democratic Studies Foundation Publication, Ankara, Turkey).Google Scholar
  2. Bilgin, N., Ergenç, A. and Timurcanday, Ö.: 1985, Perceived Life Quality: A Descriptive Study (In Turkish). Seminar, Ege University Faculty of Letters Publication, 4, 157–170.Google Scholar
  3. Campbell, A., Converse, P. E. and Rodgers, W. L.: 1976, The Quality of American Life (New York: Russell Sage).Google Scholar
  4. Chekola, M. G.: 1975, The Concept of Happiness (Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1974). Disseration Abstracts International, 35, 46095A (University microfilms no. 75–655).Google Scholar
  5. Diener, E.: 1984, ‘Subjective well-being’, Psychological Bulletin 95, 542–575.Google Scholar
  6. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J. and Griffin, S.: 1985, ‘The satisfaction with life scale’, Journal of Personality Assessment 49, 71–75.Google Scholar
  7. Larsen, R. J., Diener, E. and Emmons, R. A.: 1983, Validity and Meaning of Measures of Subjective Well-Being. Paper presented at the Midwestern Psychological Association Convention, Chicago.Google Scholar
  8. Little, B. R.: 1983, ‘Personal projects: A rationale and method for investigation’, Environment and Behavior 15, 273–309.Google Scholar
  9. Little, B. R.: 1977, ‘St. George's griddles’, Contemporary Psychology 22, 759–761.Google Scholar
  10. Michalos, A. C.: 1985, ‘Multiple discrepancies theory (MDT)’, Social Indicators Research 16, 347–413.Google Scholar
  11. Palys, T. S. and Little, B. R.: 1983, ‘Perceived life satisfaction and the organization of personal project systems’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, 1221–1230.Google Scholar
  12. Yetim, Ü.: 1985, Quality of Life Perceptions Amongst People of Different Socio-Cultural Origins: A Study of Life Events (In Turkish). Seminar, Ege University Faculty of Letters Publication 4, 144–156.Google Scholar
  13. Yetim, Ü.: 1991, Reliability and Validity of Satisfaction With Life Scale in Turkish Form (In Turkish). Paper presented to the 6th National Psychology Conference, Istanbul, Turkey. In the State of Art Lectures of 6th National Psychology Conference Book, 200–206, Istanbul University Publication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ünsal Yetİm
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyEge UniversityBornova-IzmirTurkey

Personalised recommendations