The history of higher education belies the common assumption that educational institutions are static and that faculty oppose change. Many faculty do, however, resist innovation, a resistance based not in reactionism but in a basic concern that innovators are losing sight of the centrality of the faculty role in education. That concern, although understandable, has no basis in fact, as a review of current alternative models makes clear. Indeed, one can postulate that no alternative model that avoids or minimizes the impress of the faculty can expect to meet the requirements for effective learning. Developments of the 1970s should be seen as attempts to restore earlier values of teaching and learning while responding in a new social context to a highly diverse, mass student body. The implications of this assumption bode extremely well for the future.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
This paper is adapted from a speech presented before the assembly of the Cooperative Assessment of Experiential Learning (CAEL), Denver, May 9, 1976.
About this article
Cite this article
Hall, J.W. The faculty and the future. Alternative Higher Education 1, 99–110 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079489
- High Education
- Social Psychology
- Social Context
- Alternative Model
- Educational Institution