Skip to main content
Log in

Prosecuting criminal cases in England and Wales: Reflections of an inquisitorial adversary

  • Published:
Liverpool Law Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

ReferencesReferences

  1. J.L.L.J. Edwards,The Law Officers of the Crown, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1964, 338.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See generally J. Langbein, “The Origins of Public Prosecution at Common Law”, 17American Journal of Legal History (1973), 313.

  3. Report, HMSO Cmd. 3297, at para. 15, approved by the Royal Commission on the Police, 1962, Cmnd. 1728.

  4. The Criminal Prosecution in England, London, Butterworths, 1960, 10.

  5. See, Select Committee on Public Prosecutors,Report (1856).

  6. The Royal Commission commented that there "is much to be said for the view that all criminal prosecutions should be undertaken by officials specially appointed for that purpose, as is the case in Scotland", op.cit. at para 223.

  7. Report (1962) Cmnd. 1728, at para. 380.

  8. "The Prosecution Process in England and Wales" [1970]Criminal Law Review, 668–83.

  9. See Prosecuting Solicitors' Society of England and Wales,Evidence to the Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure, Part II, Policy (1978) at para. 3.6.

  10. Ibid. at para.2.2.

  11. Ibid. at para 3.8.

  12. M. Weatheritt,The Prosecution System : Survey of Prosecuting Solicitors' Departments, Research Study No. II for the Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure (1981), HMSO.

  13. An Independent Prosecution Service for England and Wales, Cmnd. 9074, 1983. The Working Party's report is published as an annex to the White Paper.

  14. Written Evidence of the Director of Public Prosecutions (1978) Mimeo, at para. 91.

  15. Op.cit. at para 3.6.

  16. M. McConville and J. Baldwin,Courts, Prosecution and Conviction, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1981, chapter 3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reported inReport by Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure, op. cit. at 131.

  18. R v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner, ex parte Blackburn (No. 1), [1968] 2 Q.B. 118.

  19. See Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure,The Investigation and Prosecution of Criminal Offences in England and Wales : The Law and Procedure (1981) Cmnd. 8092-1, Table 23.4 at 206.

  20. Report, at para. 8.11.

  21. Turner (1970) 54 Cr.App.R. 352.

  22. See George F. Cole, "The Decision to Prosecute", 4Law and Society Review (1970), 331.

  23. M. Weatheritt, op. cit. at para. 2.47.

  24. Report, op. cit. at para 7.3.

  25. This will remain true in substance even if the right to private prosecution is retained as is proposed in the White Paper, op. cit. at para. 11.

  26. Lord Devlin,The Judge, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979, 72.

    Google Scholar 

  27. See L. Kennedy,Ten Rillington Place, London, Gollancz, 1961 andReport to the Secretary of State for the Home Department of the Departmental Committee on Evidence on Identification in Criminal Cases (1976), HMSO. See also Sir Henry Fisher'sReport on the Confait Case (1977), HMSO and L. Kennedy, "The case for taking prosecution out of police hands",The Times, 12th July 1982.

  28. S.R. Moody and J. Tombs,Prosecution in the Public Interest, Edinburgh, Scottish Academic Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Op. cit.. at 20.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McConville, M. Prosecuting criminal cases in England and Wales: Reflections of an inquisitorial adversary. Liverpool Law Rev 6, 15–32 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079435

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01079435

Keywords

Navigation