Prosecuting criminal cases in England and Wales: Reflections of an inquisitorial adversary

J.L.L.J. Edwards,The Law Officers of the Crown, London, Sweet & Maxwell, 1964, 338.Google Scholar

See generally J. Langbein, “The Origins of Public Prosecution at Common Law”, 17American Journal of Legal History (1973), 313.Google Scholar

Report, HMSO Cmd. 3297, at para. 15, approved by the Royal Commission on the Police, 1962, Cmnd. 1728.Google Scholar

The Criminal Prosecution in England, London, Butterworths, 1960, 10.Google Scholar

See, Select Committee on Public Prosecutors,Report (1856).Google Scholar

The Royal Commission commented that there "is much to be said for the view that all criminal prosecutions should be undertaken by officials specially appointed for that purpose, as is the case in Scotland", op.cit. at para 223.Google Scholar

Report (1962) Cmnd. 1728, at para. 380.Google Scholar

"The Prosecution Process in England and Wales" [1970]Criminal Law Review, 668–83.Google Scholar

See Prosecuting Solicitors' Society of England and Wales,Evidence to the Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure, Part II, Policy (1978) at para. 3.6.Google Scholar

Ibid. at para.2.2.Google Scholar

Ibid. at para 3.8.Google Scholar

M. Weatheritt,The Prosecution System : Survey of Prosecuting Solicitors' Departments, Research Study No. II for the Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure (1981), HMSO.Google Scholar

An Independent Prosecution Service for England and Wales, Cmnd. 9074, 1983. The Working Party's report is published as an annex to the White Paper.Google Scholar

Written Evidence of the Director of Public Prosecutions (1978) Mimeo, at para. 91.Google Scholar

Op.cit. at para 3.6.Google Scholar

M. McConville and J. Baldwin,Courts, Prosecution and Conviction, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1981, chapter 3.Google Scholar

Reported inReport by Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure, op. cit. at 131.Google Scholar

R v. Metropolitan Police Commissioner, ex parte Blackburn (No. 1), [1968] 2 Q.B. 118.Google Scholar

See Royal Commission on Criminal Procedure,The Investigation and Prosecution of Criminal Offences in England and Wales : The Law and Procedure (1981) Cmnd. 8092-1, Table 23.4 at 206.Google Scholar

Report, at para. 8.11.Google Scholar

Turner (1970) 54 Cr.App.R. 352.Google Scholar

See George F. Cole, "The Decision to Prosecute", 4Law and Society Review (1970), 331.Google Scholar

M. Weatheritt, op. cit. at para. 2.47.Google Scholar

Report, op. cit. at para 7.3.Google Scholar

This will remain true in substance even if the right to private prosecution is retained as is proposed in the White Paper, op. cit. at para. 11.Google Scholar

Lord Devlin,The Judge, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 1979, 72.Google Scholar

See L. Kennedy,Ten Rillington Place, London, Gollancz, 1961 andReport to the Secretary of State for the Home Department of the Departmental Committee on Evidence on Identification in Criminal Cases (1976), HMSO. See also Sir Henry Fisher'sReport on the Confait Case (1977), HMSO and L. Kennedy, "The case for taking prosecution out of police hands",The Times, 12th July 1982.Google Scholar

S.R. Moody and J. Tombs,Prosecution in the Public Interest, Edinburgh, Scottish Academic Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Op. cit.. at 20.Google Scholar