Journal of Productivity Analysis

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 247–268 | Cite as

Estimators and hypothesis tests for a stochastic frontier function: A Monte Carlo analysis

  • Tim Coelli


This paper uses Monte Carlo experimentation to investigate the finite sample properties of the maximum likelihood (ML) and corrected ordinary least squares (COLS) estimators of the half-normal stochastic frontier production function. Results indicate substantial bias in both ML and COLS when the percentage contribution of inefficiency in the composed error (denoted by γ*) is small, and also that ML should be used in preference to COLS because of large mean square error advantages when γ* is greater than 50%. The performance of a number of tests of the existence of technical inefficiency is also investigated. The Wald and likelihood ratio (LR) tests are shown to have incorrect size. A one-sided LR test and a test of the significance of the third moment of the OLS residuals are suggested as alternatives, and are shown to have correct size, with the one-sided LR test having the better power of the two.

Key words

Stochastic frontier Monte Carlo estimation tests 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Aigner, D.J., and S.F. Chu. (1968). “On Estimating the Industry Production Function.”.American Economic Review, 58, 826–839.Google Scholar
  2. Aigner, D.J., C.A.K. Lovell and P. Schmidt. (1977). “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.”Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37.Google Scholar
  3. Baltagi, B., Y. Chang and Q. Li. (1992). “Monte Carlo Results on Several New and Existing Tests for the Error Components Model.”Journal of Econometrics, 54, 95–120.Google Scholar
  4. Banker, R.D., A. Charnes, W.W. Cooper and A. Maindiratta. (1988). “A Comparison of DEA and Translog Estimates of Production Functions Using Simulated Data from a Known Technology.” In A. Dagramaci and R. Färe (eds.),Applications of Modern Production Theory: Efficiency and Productivity, Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J. (1988). “Prediction of Firm-Level Technical Efficiencies with a Generalized Frontier Production Function and Panel Data.”Journal of Econometrics, 38, 387–399.Google Scholar
  6. Battese, G.E. and G.S. Corra. (1977). “Estimation of a Production Frontier Model: With Application to the Pastoral Zone of Eastern Australia.”Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 21, 169–179.Google Scholar
  7. Bauer, P.W. (1990). “Recent Developments in the Econometric Estimation of Frontiers.”Journal of Econometrics 46, 39–56.Google Scholar
  8. Bravo-Ureta, B.E. and A.E. Pinheiro. (1993). “Efficiency Analysis of Developing Country Agriculture: A Review of the Frontier Function Literature.”Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 22, 88–101.Google Scholar
  9. Coelli, T.J. (1992). “A Computer Program for Frontier Production Function Estimation: FRONTIER Version 2.0”Economics Letters, 39, 29–32.Google Scholar
  10. Coelli, T.J. (1993).Finite Sample Properties of Stochastic Frontier Estimators and Associated Test Statistics, Working Papers in Econometrics and Applied Statistics, No. 70, University of New England, Armidale.Google Scholar
  11. Coelli, T.J. (1995). “A Monte Carlo Analysis of the Stochastic Frontier Production Function.” Mimeo, Department of Econometrics. University of New England, Armidale.Google Scholar
  12. D'Agostino, R.B. and E.S. Pearson. (1973). “Tests for Departure from Normality: Empirical Results for the Distribution ofb 2 and\(\sqrt {b_1 } \).”Biometrika, 60, 613–622.Google Scholar
  13. Gong, B. and R.C. Sickles. (1989). “Finite Sample Evidence on the Performance of Stochastic Frontier Model Using Panel Data.”Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1, 229–261.Google Scholar
  14. Gong, B. and R.C. Sickles. (1992). “Finite Sample Evidence on the Performance of Stochastic Frontiers and Data Envelopment Analysis Using Panel Data.”Journal of Econometrics, 51, 259–284.Google Scholar
  15. Gourieroux, C., A. Holly and A. Monfort. (1982). “Likelihood Ratio Test, Wald Test, and Kuhn-Tucker Test in Linear Models with Inequality Constraints on the Regression Parameters.”Econometrica, 50, 63–80.Google Scholar
  16. Greene, W.H. (1992).LIMDEP Version 60: User's Manual and Reference Guide, Econometric Software Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  17. Greene, W.H. (1993). “The Econometric Approach to Efficiency Analysis.” In H.O. Fried, C.A.K. Lovell and S.S. Schmidt (eds.),The Measurement of Productive Efficiency, New York: Oxford University Press, 68–119.Google Scholar
  18. Honda, Y. (1985). “Testing the Error Components Model with Non-Normal Disturbances.”Review of Economic Studies, 52, 681–690.Google Scholar
  19. Jensen, U. (1993).Measuring Individual Inefficiency with Frontier Functions: A Monte Carlo Study. Discussion Paper 68, Institut für Statistic und Okonometrie, der Universität Kiel, Kiel.Google Scholar
  20. Judge, G., W. Griffiths, R. Carter-Hill, H. Lutkepohl and T. Lee. (1985).The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, Second Edition, New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Lee, L.F. (1993). “Asymptotic Distribution of the Maximum Likelihood Estimator for a Stochastic Frontier Function Model with a Singular Information Matrix.”Econometric Theory, 9, 413–430.Google Scholar
  22. Meeusen, W. and J. van den Broeck. (1977). “Effciency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error.”International Economic Review, 18, 435–444.Google Scholar
  23. Olsen, J.A., P. Schmidt and D.M. Waldman. (1980). “A Monte Carlo Study of Estimators of the Stochastic Frontier Production Function.”Journal of Econometrics, 13, 67–82.Google Scholar
  24. Pagan, A.R. and A.D. Hall. (1983). “Diagnostic Tests as Residual Analysis.”Econometrics Reviews, 2, 159–218.Google Scholar
  25. Pitt, M.M. and L.-F. Lee (1981). “Measurement and Sources of Technical Inefficiency in the Indonesian Weaving Industry.”Journal of Development Economics 9, 43–64.Google Scholar
  26. Richmond, J. (1974). “Estimating the Efficiency of Production.”International Economic Review, 15, 515–521.Google Scholar
  27. Schmidt, P. and T. Lin. (1984). “Simple Tests of Alternative Specifications in Stochastic Frontier Models.”Journal of Econometrics, 24, 349–361.Google Scholar
  28. Schmidt, P. and C.A.K., Lovell. (1979). “Estimating Technical and Allocative Inefficiency Relative to Stochastic Production and Cost Function.”Journal of Econometrics 9, 343–366.Google Scholar
  29. Stevenson, R.E. (1980). “Likelihood Functions for Generalized Stochastic Frontier Estimation.”Journal of Econometrics, 13, 57–66.Google Scholar
  30. Tran, S.V.H., T. Coelli and E. Fleming. (1993) “Analysis of the Technical Efficiency of State Rubber Farms in Vietnam.”Agricultural Economics, 9, 183–201.Google Scholar
  31. Waldman, D. (1982). “A Stationary Point for the Stochastic Frontier Likelihood.”Journal of Econometrics, 18, 275–280.Google Scholar
  32. White, K. (1993).SHAZAM User's Reference Manual Version 7.0 New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Coelli
    • 1
  1. 1.Econometrics DepartmentUniversity of New EnglandArmidaleAustralia

Personalised recommendations