Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 1–10

Filled pauses and gestures: It's not coincidence

  • Nicholas Christenfeld
  • Stanley Schachter
  • Frances Bilous
Article

Abstract

Though filled pauses and gestures frequently accompany speech, their function is not well understood. We suggest that it may be helpful in furthering our knowledge of these phenomena to examine their relationship to each other. To this end, we carried out two studies examining whether they tend to occur together, or to occur at separate times. Both faculty colloquium speakers and undergraduate subjects used filled pauses less frequently when they were gesturing than when they were not gesturing. This effect held for 30 out of 31 subjects. We suggest that detailed theories may be premature, but speculate that gestures may be an indication that the speech production apparatus has completed its search for the next word, phrase or idea and is ready to continue.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beattie, G. W., & Butterworth, B. L. (1979) Contextual probability and word frequency as determinants of pauses and errors in spontaneous speech.Language and Speech, 22, 201–211.Google Scholar
  2. Birdwhistell, R. L. (1970).Kinesics and context. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  3. Butterworth, B. & Beattie, G. W. (1978). Gesture and silence as indicators of planning in speech. In N. R. Campbell & P. T. Smith (Eds.),Recent advances in the psychology of language: Formal and experimental approaches (pp. 347–360). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  4. Butterworth, B., & Goldman-Eisler, F. (1979). Recent studies in cognitive rhythm. In A. W. Siegman & S. Feldstein (Eds.),Of speech and time: Temporal speech patterns in interpersonal contexts (pp. 211–224). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  5. Cohen, A. A. (1977). The communicative function of hand illustrators.Journal of Commnication, 27, 54–63.Google Scholar
  6. Dittman, A. T., & Llewellyn, L. G. (1969). Body movement and speech rhythm in social conversation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 98–106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Feldstein, S., Brenner, M. S., & Jaffe, J. (1963). The effect of subject sex, verbal interaction and topical focus on speech disruption.Language and Speech, 6, 229–239.Google Scholar
  8. Fleiss, J. L. (1986).The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. Freedman, N. (1972). The analysis of movement behavior during the clinical interview. In A. Siegman and B. Pope (Eds.),Studies in dyadic communication (pp. 153–175 Elmsford, NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  10. Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968).Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  11. Greene, J. O., & Lindsey, A. E. (1989). Encoding processes in the production of multiple-goal messages.Human Communication Research, 16, 120–140.Google Scholar
  12. Hadar, U., Steiner, T. J., & Rose, F. C. (1984). The relationship between head movements and speech dysfluencies.Language and Speech, 27, 333–342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Krauss, R. M., Apple, W., Morency, N., Wenzel, C., & Winton, W. (1981). Verbal, vocal, and visible factors in judgments of another's effect.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40, 312–320.Google Scholar
  14. Krauss, R. M., & Morrel-Samuels, P. (1988, February).Some things we do and don't know about hand gestures. Paper presented at meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, Boston.Google Scholar
  15. Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968).Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  16. Maclay, H. & Osgood, C. E. (1959). Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech.Word, 15, 19–44.Google Scholar
  17. Mahl, G. F. (1987).Explorations in nonverbal and vocal behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  18. McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal?Psychological Review, 92, 350–371.Google Scholar
  19. Panek, D. M., & Martin, B. (1959). The relationship between GSR and speech disturbances in psychotherapy.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 402–405.Google Scholar
  20. Ragsdale, J. D., & Silvia, C. F. (1982). Distribution of kinesic hesitation phenomena in spontaneous speech.Language and Speech, 25, 185–190.Google Scholar
  21. Rochester, S. R. (1973). The significance of pauses in spontaneous speech.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 2, 51–81.Google Scholar
  22. Schachter, S., Christenfeld, N. J. S., Ravina, B., & Bilous, F. (1990). Speech disfluency and the structure of knowledge.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (in press).Google Scholar
  23. Schachter, S., Christenfeld, N. J. S., & Rodstein, B. (1990). On the perception of pauses in spontaneous speech. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  24. Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some gestures' relation to talk. In J. M. Anderson & J. Heritage (Eds.),Structures of social action: Studies in conversational analyses (pp. 266–296). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Vrolijk, A. (1974). Habituation as a mode of treatment of speaking anxiety.Gedrag Tijdschrift voor Psychologie, 2, 332–338.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Christenfeld
    • 1
  • Stanley Schachter
    • 1
  • Frances Bilous
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyColumbia UniversityNew York

Personalised recommendations