Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 13, Issue 4, pp 295–306 | Cite as

Bilingual frequency encoding

  • Philip H. Marshall
  • Libardo Eduardo Caraveo-Ramos
Article

Abstract

Two experiments are reported that examine the nature of the processing of frequency information in Spanish-English bilinguals. In the first study, subjects studied a list of English-only, Spanish-only, and mixed-language words varying in their frequency of occurrence, and under conditions of being either informed or uninformed about the later frequency test. Subjects were then shown pictures represeting the nominally presented items and had to give frequency judgments for the words depicting the objects. Frequency judgments were significantly faster when the words had been presented in a single language, suggesting a summation of access times for the mixed-language words. Instructional conditions had no effect on frequency judgments, but the latency to judge was significantly reduced for the informed subjects. In the second study, using similar acquisition procedures, subjects were shown test words in either the same or the different language from the one in which the words were originally experienced. Subjects demonstrated a clear ability to assign frequencies according to the relationship between acquisition and test language. The data were discussed in terms of supporting the hypothesis of separate bilingual language processing, and implications for the automatic nature of frequency acquisition were also addressed.

Keywords

Language Processing Access Time Frequency Test Frequency Information Test Word 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ehri, L. C., & Ryan, E. B. (1980). Performance of bilinguals in a picture word interference task.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 9, 285–302.Google Scholar
  2. Hasher, L., & Chromiak, W. (1977). The processing of frequency information: An automatic mechanism?Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 173–184.Google Scholar
  3. Hasher, L., & Zacks, R. T. (1979). Automatic and effortful processes in memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 108, 356–388.Google Scholar
  4. Kolers, P. A., & Gonzalez, E. (1980). Memory for words, synonyms, and translations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 53–65.Google Scholar
  5. Macnamara, J., & Kushnir, S. L. (1971). Linguistic independence of bilinguals: The input switch.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10, 480–487.Google Scholar
  6. Magiste, E. (1980). Memory for numbers in monolinguals and bilinguals.Acta Psychologica, 46, 63–68.Google Scholar
  7. Marshall, P. H., Chao, C., & Horner, N. (n.d.).Frequency judgments as a function of intention and task difficulty: A case against automaticity. Unpublished manuscript, Texas Tech University.Google Scholar
  8. McCormack, P. D. (1974). Bilingual linguistic memory: Independence on interdependence; two stores or one? In S. T. Carey (Ed.),Bilingualism, biculturalism and education. Edmonton, Canada: University of Alberta.Google Scholar
  9. McCormack, P. D. (1977). Bilingual linguistic memory: The independence-interdependence issue revisited. In P. A. Hornby (Ed.),Bilingualism, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Schuell, H., & Benson, L. (1965).Card materials for the Minnesota Test for Differential Diagnosis of Ophasia. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Philip H. Marshall
    • 1
  • Libardo Eduardo Caraveo-Ramos
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyTexas Tech UniversityLubbock

Personalised recommendations