Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Reformatory blame

  • 43 Accesses

  • 8 Citations

Abstract

It is argued that “blame” is an ambiguous and misused term leading to ineffective, harmful consequences, such as hate, guilt, revenge (retaliation, or retribution), or punishment for its own sake. A clarification of blame is given by showing that it is an open-context, value term and, so, meaningless in itself. For intelligibility, it must be reduced to naturalistic and pragmatic terms. The definition almost universally given is based on the fallacious beliefs that (1) we can change the past, and (2) we can have done otherwise than we did. But “can” here is seen also to be used in a pseudo-scientific and subjunctive, rather than in a factual sense. It is shown that retributive blame makes no sense because, as Marcus Aurelius said, we must accept what is and we can only do what is within our power. We cannot change past behavior, but we can try to change present behavior. For effectiveness and intelligibility, we are forced to substitute rehabilitative blame for retributive blame. Thus, in the prevention and elimination of such negative emotions as guilt, inferiority, hatred, revengefulness, a thorough understanding of the term “blame” is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aune, Bruce. (1967). Can. In P. Edwards (Ed.),Encyclopedia of philosophy (reprint ed.) (Vol. 1, pp. 18–20). New York: Macmillan.

  2. Aurelius, Marcus. (1873).The meditations (G. Long, Trans.). New York: Doubleday. (Original work written c. 170 A.D.)

  3. Benson, George. (1982).Business ethics in America. Lexington, MA: Heath.

  4. Brandt, Richard. (1958). Blameworthiness and obligation. In A. I. Melden (Ed.),Essays in moral philosophy, (pp. 3–39). Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.

  5. (CJS)Corpus Juris Secundum. (1966). Negligence. (Vol. 65, pp. 413 ff.) St. Paul, MN: West.

  6. Dewey, John, & Tufts, J. (1932).Ethics (rev. ed.). New York: Henry Holt. (Original work published 1908).

  7. Dewey, John. (1939).Theory of valuation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.

  8. Dolan, Edward. (1984).The insanity plea. NY: Franklin Watts.

  9. Ellis, Albert. (1962).Reason and emotion in psychotherapy. Secaucus, NJ: Citadel.

  10. [Epictetus]. (1916).Enchiridion: The manual of Epictetus. (P. E. Matheson, Trans.) Oxford: Clarendon. (Original work written by his pupil, Flavius Arrian in 2nd century A.D.)

  11. Fischer, David. (1970).Historian's fallacies. New York: Harper & Row.

  12. Gallagher, Neil. (1978). Utilitarian blame: Retrospective and prospects.Journal of Value Inquiry, 12, 13–23.

  13. Hamilton, E., & Cairns, H. (Eds). (1961).The collected dialogues of Plato. New York: Pantheon. (See alsoMeno, p. 361, 786;Timaeus, p. 1207, 87b;Protagoras, pp. 348–349, 358b-d).

  14. Hill, M., Rossen, H., & Sogg, W. (1975).Torts, St. Paul, MN: West.

  15. Johson, T. (1955).The Poems of Emily Dickinson (Vol. 3). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  16. Kenner, Lionel. (1967). On blaming.Mind, 76, 238–249.

  17. Miller, Fred, & Attig, T. (Eds.). (1979).Understanding human emotions. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University.

  18. Oelschlaeger, Max. (1981). Philosophical therapy for business managers.Southwest Philosophical Studies, 6, 98–104.

  19. Oxford English dictionary. (1933). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  20. The Peace Corps: Hearings before the committee on foreign relations. United States Senate, 87th Congress on [Bill] S.2000. (June 22 and 23, 1961). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  21. Prosser, William. (1971).Handbook of the law of torts (4th ed.). St. Paul, MN: West.

  22. Rorty, Amélie (Ed.). (1980).Explaining emotions. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

  23. Shibles, Warren. (1974).Emotion: The method of philosophical therapy. Whitewater, WI: The Language Press.

  24. Shibles, Warren. (1972a). Ethics as open-context terms. InPhilosophical pictures (rev. ed.), (pp. 51–64). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.

  25. Shibles, Warren. (1980). Ethics as a science: Going from “is” to “ought.”Iowa Science Teachers Journal, 17(3), 26–32.

  26. Shibles, Warren. (1972b). Free will. InPhilosophical pictures (rev. ed.). (pp. 65–69). Dubuque, IA: Kendall-Hunt.

  27. Shibles, Warren. (1979).How to teach ethics and emotion in the schools. Paper presented at the meeting of the Philosophy of Education Society. Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, Canada.

  28. Shibles, Warren. (1978). Teaching young people to be critical series: Titles:Ethics, Emotion, Time, Humor, Good and bad are funny things, Lying (1985). Whitewater, WI: The Language Press.

  29. Smart, J. J. C. (1961). Free-will, praise and blame.Mind, 60, 291–306.

  30. Squires, J. E. R. (1968). Blame.The Philosophical Quarterly, 18(70), 54–60.

  31. Strafgesetzbuch Kommentar. (St GB). (1982). (21. Auflage). München: C. H. Beck'sche Verlag.

  32. Webster's Third New International Dictionary. (1986). (Unabridged.) Springfield, MA: Merriam Webster.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Warren Shibles.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shibles, W. Reformatory blame. Journal of Rational-Emotive Therapy 5, 266–281 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01073817

Download citation

Keywords

  • Public Health
  • Negative Emotion
  • Harmful Consequence
  • Past Behavior
  • Factual Sense