Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 289–302 | Cite as

The fear of reprisal and the failure of victims to report a personal crime

  • Simon I. Singer
Article

Abstract

Most people who fail to report their victimizations to the police state either that the incident was not serious enough to warrant official attention or that nothing could be done. However, a small proportion of victims states that they did not report because of their fear of reprisal. Based on National Crime Panel victimization data, the offense and personal characteristics of these victims are contrasted with the total victim and nonreporting victim populations. Contrary to the general reasons for not reporting a crime, several personal and offense characteristics are related to reprisal. For instance, reprisal is more often a factor in personal victimizations where victims are female and acquainted with their offenders. The more dangerous the incident, the more often reprisal is the stated reason for not calling the police. The results of the analysis strongly suggest that in certain social environments the fear of reprisal is a major factor in the reporting of crime.

Key words

victim reporting fear offender reprisal 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berk, R. A., Berk, S. F., Newton, P. J., and Loseke, D. R. (1984). Cops on call: Summoning the police to the scene of spousal violence.Law Society 18: 479–498.Google Scholar
  2. Black, D. (1976).The Behavior of Law, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Black, D. (1983). Crime as social control.Am. Sociol. Rev. 48: 34–45.Google Scholar
  4. Brownmiller, S. (1975).Against Our Will: Men, Women, and Rape, Simon & Schuster, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Ewing, C. P. (1987).Battered Women Who Kill, Lexington Books, Lexington, Mass.Google Scholar
  6. Fried, J. P. (1982). Intimidation of witnesses called “widespread.”New York Times, Sunday, May 2.Google Scholar
  7. Gottfredson, M. R., and Hindelang, M. J. (1979). A study of the behavior of law.Am. Sociol. Rev. 44: 3–18.Google Scholar
  8. Hindelang, M. J. (1976).Criminal Victimization in Eight American Cities: A Descriptive Analysis of Common Theft and Assault, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  9. Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M., and Garofalo, J. (1978).Victims of Person Crime, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  10. Lejeune, R., and Alex, N. (1973). On being mugged: The event and its aftermath.Urban Life Culture, 2: 257–287.Google Scholar
  11. Levine, J. P. (1976). The potential for crime overreporting in criminal victimization surveys.Criminology 14: 307–331.Google Scholar
  12. Lizotte, A. J. (1976). The uniqueness of rape: Reporting assaultive violence to the police.Crime Delinq. 31: 161–190.Google Scholar
  13. Merry, S. E. (1981).Urban Danger: Life in a Neighborhood of Strangers, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  14. Nelson, J. F. (1980). Multiple victimization in American cities: A statistical analysis of rare events.Am. J. Sociol. 85: 870–891.Google Scholar
  15. Otterbein, K. F., and Otterbein, C. S. (1965). An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth: A cross-cultural study of feuding.Am. Anthropol. 67: 1470–1482.Google Scholar
  16. President's Task Force (1982).Victims of Crime, Final Report.Google Scholar
  17. San Jose Methods Test of Known Crime Victims (1972).Statistical Technical Reports No. 1, National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice Statistics Division, Law Enforcement Assistance Administration, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  18. Sellin, T. (1971). The significance of records of crime. In Radzinowicz, L., and Wolfgang, M. E. (eds.),The Criminal in Society, Basic Books, New York (originally published in 1951).Google Scholar
  19. Sheehan, S. (1978).A Prison and Prisoner, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  20. Singer, S. I. (1979). On victimization surveys: A comment on alleged over reporting.Criminology 69: 379–394.Google Scholar
  21. Skogan, W. G. (1976). Citizen reporting of crime: Some national panel data.Criminology 13: 535–549.Google Scholar
  22. Skogan, W., and Maxfield, M. G. (1981).Coping with Crime: Individual and Neighborhood Reactions, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.Google Scholar
  23. Sparks, R. F., Genn, H. G., and Dodd, D. J. (1977).Surveying Victims, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Suttles, G. D. (1968).The Social Order of the Slum, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. U.S. Department of Justice (1975).Criminal Victimization in Thirteen American Cities, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  26. Warr, M. (1985). Fear of victimization: Why are women and the elderly more afraid?Soc. Sci. Q. 59: 681–702.Google Scholar
  27. Wolfgang, M. E., and Ferracuti, F. (1967).The Subculture of Violence, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
  28. Ziegenhagen, E. A. (1976). The recidivist victim of violent crime.Victimol. Int. J. 1: 538–550.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Simon I. Singer
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe State University of New York at BuffaloBuffalo

Personalised recommendations