Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Bacterial pollution and disinfection of the colonofiberscope

I. An investigation of traditional sterilization methods

  • 14 Accesses

  • 9 Citations

Abstract

We have studied the effects of traditional methods of disinfection of the colonofiberscope and have found that serious pollution by both grampositive and gram-negative organisms occurs on the tip, tube, and operation panel of the scope after routine colonofiberscopic examinations. Colonic flora were found simultaneously on the examiner's hands and in the house dust during the clinical examination procedure. Sterilization of the scope, using commercially available antiseptics (ie, cresol, benzethonium chloride, and chlorhexidine), was found to be incomplete except for a rather satisfactory disinfection obtained by a combined brushing process in chlorhexidine solution. It is concluded that traditional sterilization methods inadequately disinfect the colonofiberscope for clinical use, thus microbial infection through the endoscopic route to and between the patients should be considered. Protection of the endoscopist and his assistant from infection also needs to be emphasized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 1.

    Sakai Y, Ashizawa S: Fiberscopic examination of the rectum and sigmoid colon. Gastroent Jap 5:281, 1970

  2. 2.

    Bornside GH, Cohn L: The normal microbial flora. Am J Dig Dis 10:844, 1965

  3. 3.

    Kalser MH, Cohen R: The normal viral and bacterial flora of the human small and large intestine. N Engl J Med 274:500, 1966

  4. 4.

    Gorbach SL, Nahas L, Lerner PI: Studies of intestinal flora. Gastroenterology 53:845, 1967

  5. 5.

    Kauffmann F: Enterobacteriaceae. Copenhagen, Munksgaard, 1954

  6. 6.

    Davies GE, Francis J, Martin AR, Rose FL, Swan G: 1∶6-Di:-4′-chlorophenyldiguanidohexane (hibitane): laboratory investigation of a new antibacterial agent of high potency. Br J Pharmacol Chemother 9:192, 1954

  7. 7.

    Lawrence CA: Antimicrobial activity, in vitro, of chlorhexidine, J Am Pharmacol Assos 49:731, 1960

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Prof. Shinroku Ashizawa MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chang, F., Sakai, Y. & Ashizawa, S. Bacterial pollution and disinfection of the colonofiberscope. Digest Dis Sci 18, 946–950 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01072438

Download citation

Keywords

  • Dust
  • Clinical Examination
  • Traditional Method
  • House Dust
  • Chlorhexidine