Behavior Genetics

, Volume 24, Issue 6, pp 481–491 | Cite as

Genetic and environmental variation in Eysenck Personality Questionnaire scales measured on Australian adolescent twins

  • Greg T. Macaskill
  • John L. Hopper
  • Victoria White
  • David J. Hill
Article

Abstract

The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire was administered to 1400 Australian twin pairs aged 11 to 18, and the data were analyzed by a multivariate normal model using the software FISHER. For each scale, attempts were made to transform to normality, about a mean modeled separately for each sex as a quadratic function of age. Variances and covariances were estimated for each sex-zygosity group as a monotone function of age. Evidence for genetic sources of variation were assessed in part by fitting models which allowed for age-dependent, sex-specific, and correlated additive genetic factors, and age-dependent and sex-specific environmental factors, under the assumption that effects of environmental factors common to twin pairs are independent of zygosity. Evidence for genetic factors independent of age and sex was most compelling for Psychoticism and Neuroticism. For Extraversion, if genetic factors exist they would be mostly sex-specific and age-dependent. For the Lie scale there was evidence for, at most, a small component of genetic variation.

Key Words

Adolescence extraversion multivariate normal model neuroticism psychoticism social conformity twins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification.IEEE Trans. Automat. Control AC-19:716–723.Google Scholar
  2. Baker R. J., and Nelder, J. A. (1978).The GLIM System Release 3, Generalized Linear Interactive Modelling, Numerical Algorithms Group, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Box, G. E. P., and Cox, D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations.J. R. Stat. Soc. B. 26:211–252.Google Scholar
  4. Eaves, L. J. (1977). Inferring the causes of human variation.J. R. Stat. Soc. A 140:324–355.Google Scholar
  5. Eaves, L. J., Last, K. A., Young, P. A., and Martin, N. G. (1978). Model-fitting approaches to the analysis of human behaviour.Heredity 41:249–320.Google Scholar
  6. Eaves, L. J., Eysenck, H. J., and Martin, N. G. (1989).Genes, Culture and Personality: An Empirical Approach, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  7. Eysenck, H. J. (1952).The Scientific Study of Personality, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  8. Eysenck, S. B. G., and Eysenck, H. J. (1975).Manual of the EPQ (Eysenck Personality Questionnaire), University of London Press, London.Google Scholar
  9. Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance.Trans. R. Soc. Edimb. 52:399–433.Google Scholar
  10. Heath, A. C., and Martin, N. G. (1990). Psychoticism as a dimension of personality: A multivariate genetic test of Eysenck and Eysenck's psychoticism construct.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 58:111–121.Google Scholar
  11. Heath, A. C., Jardine, R., Eaves, L. J., and Martin, N. G. (1988). The genetic structure of personality. I. Phenotypic factor structure of the EPQ in an Australian sample.Person. Indiv. Diff. 9:59–67.Google Scholar
  12. Heath, A. C., Jardine, R., Eaves, L. J., and Martin, N. G. (1989a). The genetic structure of personality. II. Genetic item analysis of the EPQ.Person. Indiv. Diff. 10:615–624.Google Scholar
  13. Heath, A. C., Eaves, L. J., and Martin, N. G. (1989b). The genetic structure of personality. III. Multivariate genetic item analysis of the EPQ scales.Person. Indiv. Diff. 10: 877–888.Google Scholar
  14. Hill, D. J., White, V. M., Pain, M. D., and Gardner, G. J. (1990). Tobacco and alcohol use among Australian secondary schoolchildren in 1987.Med. J. Aust. 152:124–130.Google Scholar
  15. Hopper, J. L. (1992). The epidemiology of genetic epidemiology.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 41:261–273.Google Scholar
  16. Hopper, J. L. (1993). Variance components for statistical genetics: Applications in medical research to characteristics related to human diseases and health.Stat. Meth. Med. Res. 2:199–223.Google Scholar
  17. Hopper, J. L., and Mathews, J. D. (1982). Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysis.Ann. Hum. Genet. 46:373–383.Google Scholar
  18. Hopper, J. L., and Mathews, J. D. (1994). A multivariate normal model for pedigree and longitudinal data, and the software ‘FISHER’.Austral. J. Statist. 36:153–176.Google Scholar
  19. Hopper, J. L., White, V. M., Macaskill, G. T., Hill, D. J., and Clifford, C. A. (1992). Alcohol use, smoking habits and the Junior Eysenck Personality Questionnaire in adolescent Australian twins.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 41: 311–324. [See also errata corrigeActa Genet. Med. Gemellol. 42:185 (1993).]Google Scholar
  20. Kaprio, J., Koskenvuo, M., and Rose, R. J. (1990). Change in cohabitation and intrapair similarity of monozygotic (MZ) cotwins for alcohol use, extraversion, and neuroticism.Behav. Genet. 20:265–276.Google Scholar
  21. Lange, K., Westlake, J., and Spence, M. A. (1976). Extensions to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method.Ann. Hum. Genet. 39:485–491.Google Scholar
  22. Lange, K., Boehnke, M., and Weeks, D. (1987).Programs for Pedigree Analysis, Department of Biomathematics, UCLA, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  23. Rose, R. J., and Kaprio, J. (1988). Frequency and social contact and intra-pair resemblance of adult MZ co-twins: Does shared experience influence personality after all?Behav. Genet. 18:309–328.Google Scholar
  24. Rose, R. J., Kaprio, J., Williams, C. J., Viken, R., and Obremski, K. (1990). Social contact and sibling similarity: Facts, issues, and red herrings.Behav. Genet. 20:763–778.Google Scholar
  25. Viken, R. J., Rose, R. J., Kaprio, J., and Koskenvuo, M. (1994). A developmental genetic analysis of adult personality: Extraversion and neuroticism from 18 to 59 years of age.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 66:722–730.Google Scholar
  26. Young, P. A., Eaves, L. J., and Eysenck, H. J. (1980). Intergenerational stability and change in the causes of variation in personality.J. Personal. Indiv. Diff. 1:35–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Greg T. Macaskill
    • 1
  • John L. Hopper
    • 1
  • Victoria White
    • 2
  • David J. Hill
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Public Health and Community Medicine Genetic Epidemiology UnitThe University of MelbourneCarlton, VictoriaAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Behavioural Research in CancerThe Anti-Cancer Council of VictoriaCarltonAustralia

Personalised recommendations