Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Retrieval models in on-line documentary information systems: An analytic review

  • 19 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Literature Cited

  1. 1.

    L. C. Smith, “Artificial intelligence in information retrieval systems,” Inform. Process. Management,12, No. 3, 189–222 (1975).

  2. 2.

    E. D. Barraclough, “On-line searching in information retrieval,” J. Doc.,33, No. 3, 220–238 (1977).

  3. 3.

    K. Sparck Jones and C. J. van Rijsbergen, “Information retrieval test collections,” J. Doc.,32, No. 1, 59–75 (1976).

  4. 4.

    H. F. Dammers, “The economics of computer-based information systems: A Review,” J. Doc.,31, No. 1, 38–45 (1975).

  5. 5.

    Z. G. Martirosyan and G. V. Zvereva, “Structure of automated information retrieval systems operating in dialogue mode,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 5, 35–37 (1974).

  6. 6.

    D. R. Swanson, “Information retrieval as a trial-and-error process,” Lib. Q.,47, No. 2, 128–148 (1977).

  7. 7.

    C. Vernimb, “Automation query adjustment in document retrieval,” Inform. Process. Management,13, 339–353 (1977).

  8. 8.

    N. N. Chernenko, A Review of Certain US Government Automated IRS [in Russian], Kiev (1976) (Preprint No. 76-43, Institute of Cybernetics, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR).

  9. 9.

    G. N. Aptekman, K. I. Volodin, and M. V. Rabins, “Comparison of software packages for automated IRS,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 10, 23–25 (1979).

  10. 10.

    O. E. Yakovlev, “Description and analysis of automated data banks,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 7, 29–38 (1979).

  11. 11.

    R. N. Oddy, “Information retrieval through man-machine dialogue,” J. Doc.,33, No. 1, 1–14 (1977).

  12. 12.

    S. E. Robertson, “Progress in documentation. Theories and models in information retrieval,” J. Doc.,33, No. 2, 126–148 (1977).

  13. 13.

    A. I. Mal'tsev, Algebraic Systems [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1972).

  14. 14.

    A. G. Kurosh, Readings in General Algebra [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1973).

  15. 15.

    R. C. Lyndon, Notes on Logic, Van Nostrand Reinhold (1966).

  16. 16.

    E. Raseva and R. Sikorskii, The Mathematics of Metamathematics [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1972).

  17. 17.

    L. A. Skornyakov, Elements of the Theory of Structure [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1968).

  18. 18.

    Nicolas Bourbaki, General Topology, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts (1966).

  19. 19.

    C. J. van Rijsbergen, “A theoretical basis for the use of co-occurrence data in information retrieval,” J. Doc.,33, No. 2, 106–119 (1977).

  20. 20.

    D. J. Harper and C. J. van Rijsbergen, “An evaluation of feedback in document retrieval using co-occurrence data,” J. Doc.,34, No. 3, 189–216 (1978).

  21. 21.

    S. E. Robertson and K. Sparck Jones, “Relevance weighting of search terms,” J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci.,27, No. 3, 129–146 (1976).

  22. 22.

    C. K. Chow and C. N. Liu, “Approximating discrete probability distributions with dependence trees,” IEEE Trans. Inform. Theor.,IT-14, No. 3, 462–467 (1968).

  23. 23.

    V. K. Whitney, “Minimal spanning tree, Algorithm 422,” Commun. ACM,15, 273–274 (1972).

  24. 24.

    K. Sparck Jones, “A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval,” J. Doc.,28, 11–21 (1972).

  25. 25.

    W. L. Miller, “Probabilistic search strategy for MEDLARS,” J. Doc.,27, 254–266 (1971).

  26. 26.

    G. Salton and R. K. Waldstein, “Term relevance weights in on-line information retrieval,” Inform. Process. Management,14, 29–35 (1978).

  27. 27.

    V. G. Voiskunskii and V. I. Frants, “Adjustment of request specifications in a documentary IRS,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 7, 7–12 (1974).

  28. 28.

    V. I. Gor'kova and A. É. Khodzha-Bagirova, “Adjustment of request specifications as a problem of statistical decision theory,” Nauchn.-Inform., Ser. 2, No. 11, 18–21 (1975).

  29. 29.

    A. I. Chernyi, Introduction to the Theory of Information Retrieval [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1975).

  30. 30.

    C. J. van Rijsbergen, Information Retrieval, Butterworth, London and Boston (1975).

  31. 31.

    Gerard Salton, Automatic Information Organization and Retrieval, McGraw-Hill, New York (1968).

  32. 32.

    N. J. Nilson, Learning Machines—Foundation of Trainable Pattern Classifying Systems, McGraw-Hill, New York (1965), p. 81.

  33. 33.

    J. J. Rocchio, Jr., “Relevance feedback in information retrieval,” in: G. Salton (ed.), The SMART Retrieval System, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey (1971).

  34. 34.

    Gerard Salton, Dynamic Information and Library Processing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1975).

  35. 35.

    P. V. Angione, “On the equivalence of Boolean and weighted searching based on the convertibility of query forms,” J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci.,26, No. 2, 112–124 (1976).

  36. 36.

    Yu. M. Gornostaev, S. I. Molibozhenko, and E. V. Sosin, “Comparative description of three software packages (IRMS, DPS, and TEXT-PAC) of IBM implementing IRS,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 2, 28–36 (1974).

  37. 37.

    J. Martin, Design of Data Bases in Computer Systems [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1978).

  38. 38.

    A. Bookstein, “On the perils of merging Boolean and weighted retrieval systems,” J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci.,28, 156–158 (1978).

  39. 39.

    V. M. Driyanskii and I. B. Dugina, “Computer-oriented algorithm of translation of an arbitrary propositional calculus formula into disjunctive normal form,” in: Semantic Models of Scientific Information Retrieval and Methods of Design of Linguistic Software of Documentary IRS [in Russian], Kiev (1979), pp. 40–46 (Preprint No. 79-8, Institute of Cybernetics, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR).

  40. 40.

    V. M. Driyanskii and T. N. Komarova, “Statistical model of adjustment of requests,” in: Methods and Experience with Data Processing Systems Operation [in Russian], Kiev (1979), pp. 47–61.

  41. 41.

    V. M. Driyanskii and T. N. Komarova, “Presearch model of retrieval in documentary information systems,” in: Proceedings of First All-Union Conference on Data Banks, Sec. 1. Theoretic Problems (Abstracts) [in Russian], Tbilisi (1980), pp. 133–136.

  42. 42.

    Yu. M. Rakitin, “Possibilities of formal description of descriptor IRS,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 11 (1978).

  43. 43.

    A. V. Blek, “Method of information retrieval in a file indexed with key words by using a thesaurus based on expert queries,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 11, 26–32 (1967).

  44. 44.

    V. S. Shtein, “The language of factographic IRS. Adjustment of request specifications,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 3, 14–19 (1974).

  45. 45.

    Yu. L. Pokras, “A method for determination of degree of connection of descriptors in an information-retrieval thesaurus,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 6, 22–24 (1979).

  46. 46.

    V. M. Driyanskii, Semantic Model for Search Specification Adjustment [in Russian], Kiev (1979) (Preprint No. 19-25, Institute of Cybernetics, Academy of Sciences of the Ukrainian SSR).

  47. 47.

    V. S. Shtein, G. A. Teoradze, A. É. Vitel's, T. V. Nazarova, R. N. Sofronova, and G. A. Sokolova, “Request adjustment in a factographic IRS using a pre-coordinate-indexing language and dialogue,” Nauchn.-Tekh. Inform., Ser. 2, No. 3, 19–30 (1977).

  48. 48.

    A. Bookstein and W. Cooper, “Model for information retrieval systems,” Lib. Q.,46, No. 2, 153–167 (1976).

  49. 49.

    A. Bookstein, “When the most ‘pertinent’ document should not be retrieved—an analysis of the Swets model,” Inform. Process. Management,13, 377–383 (1977).

  50. 50.

    D. H. Kraft and A. Bookstein, “Evaluation of information retrieval approach,” J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci.,28, 31–40 (1978).

  51. 51.

    V. P. Chistyakov, Course in Probability Theory [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1978).

  52. 52.

    S. E. Robertson, “The probability ranking principle in IR,” J. Doc.,33, No. 4,294–304 (1977).

  53. 53.

    I. G. Sidorov, “Similarities and differences in problems of associative retrieval and pattern recognition,” Automat Doc. Math. Linguistics,3, No. 2, 61–65 (1969).

  54. 54.

    C. J. van Rijsbergen and K. Sparck Jones, “A test for the separation in relevant and nonrelevant documents in experimental retrieval collections,” J. Doc.,29, 251–257 (1973).

  55. 55.

    C. J. van Rijsbergen, “Further experiments with hierarchic clustering in document retrieval,” Inform. Storage Retrieval,10, 1–14 (1974).

  56. 56.

    S. E. Robertson, “The probabilistic character of relevance,” Inform. Process. Management,13, 247–251 (1977).

  57. 57.

    V. Tahani, “A fuzzy model of information retrieval systems,” Inform. Process. Management,12, 177–187 (1976).

  58. 58.

    T. Radecki, “Mathematical model of information retrieval system based on the concept of fuzzy thesaurus,” Inform. Process. Management,12, 313–318 (1976).

  59. 59.

    S. E. Robertson and N. J. Belkin, “Ranking in principle,” J. Doc.,34, No. 2, 93–100 (1978).

  60. 60.

    L. A. Zadeh, “PRUF—a meaning representation language for natural languages,” Int. J. Man—Machine Stud.,10, 395–460 (1978).

Download references

Additional information

Translated from Kibernetika, No. 2, pp. 102–118, March–April, 1981.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Driyanskii, V.M. Retrieval models in on-line documentary information systems: An analytic review. Cybern Syst Anal 17, 269–287 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01069646

Download citation

Keywords

  • Information System
  • Operating System
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • System Theory
  • Retrieval Model