Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 13, Issue 6, pp 415–442 | Cite as

Subjective reactions to phonological variation in Costa Rican Spanish

  • Susan Berk-Seligson
Article
Accepted:

Abstract

The results of a subjective reaction test on a sample of 440 Costa Ricans indicate that in societies where educational levels are not generally high, social status groups may be differentiated phonologically by the use of prestigeful features rather than by stigmatized ones, contrary to findings regarding social dialects in the United States. Participating listeners discriminated between three speakers whose reading of a Spanish text varied only according to their percentage use of stigmatized and prestige phonological variables—specifically, accent shift, vowel alternation, and consonantal alternation. As hypothesized, listeners assigned occupational status to, distanced themselves socially from, and attributed personality and socioeconomically related traits to speakers according to the degree of prestigefulness or stigmatization of the latter's speech. However, whereas listeners could distinguish well between the prestige speaker, on the one hand, and the intermediate and stigmatized speakers on the other, they barely differentiated between the latter two. Whereas male and female listeners did not differ significantly from each other in their reactions, contrary to expectation, older listeners, compared to younger ones, significantly more often discriminated between speakers in the expected direction, confirming further that sociolinguistic competence is acquired gradually.

Keywords

Cognitive Psychology Educational Level Social Status Status Group Occupational Status 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anshen, F. (1969).Speech variation among Negroes in a small southern community. Doctoral dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
  2. Berk-Seligson, S. (1978).Phonological variation in a synchronic/diachronic sociolinguistic context: The case of Costa Rican Spanish. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
  3. Berk-Seligson, S. & Seligson, M. A. (1978). The phonological correlates of social stratification in Costa Rican Spanish.Lingua, 46, 1–28.Google Scholar
  4. Bourhis, R. Y., & Giles, H. (1976). The language of cooperation in Wales: A field study.Language Sciences, 42, 13–16.Google Scholar
  5. Bourhis, R. Y., Giles, H. & Lambert, W. E. (1975). Social consequences of accommodating one's style of speech: A cross-national investigation. In R. Cooper (Ed.),Language Attitudes II: International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 6, 55–71.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, B. L. (1969).The social psychology of variations in French Canadian speech styles. Doctoral dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
  7. Carranza, M. A., & Ryan, E. B. (1975). Evaluative reactions of bilingual Anglo and Mexican American speakers of English and Spanish. In R. Cooper (Ed.),Language Attitudes II: International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 6, 83–104.Google Scholar
  8. Castillo, G. & de Castillo, J. C. (1973). Personal communication, Agua Buena de Coto Brus, Costa Rica.Google Scholar
  9. Cook-Gumperz, J. (1975). The child as practical reasoner. In M. Sanches & B. G. Blount (Eds.),Sociocultural dimensions of language use. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, R. L. (1975). Introduction. In R. L. Cooper (Ed.),Language Attitudes II: International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 6, 5–10.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, R. L., Fishman, J. A., Lown, L., Schaier, B. & Seckbach, F., (1977). Language, technology and persuasion in the Middle East: Three experimental studies. In H. Giles (Ed.)Language, Ethnicity, and intergroup relations. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. D'Anglejan, A, & Tucker, G. R. (1973). Sociolinguistic correlates of speech style in Quebec. In R. W. Shuy & R. W. Fasold (Eds.),Language attitudes: Current trends and prospects. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  13. El-Dash, L, & Tucker, G. R. (1975). Subjective reactions to various speech styles in Egypt. In R. L. Cooper (Ed.),Language Attitudes II: International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 6, 33–54.Google Scholar
  14. Fasold, R. W. (1968).A sociolinguistic study of the pronunciation of three vowels in Detroit speech. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics. (Mimeo)Google Scholar
  15. Flores, N. de la Z., & Hopper, R. (1975). Mexican Americans' evaluations of spoken Spanish and English.Speech Monographs, 42, 91–98.Google Scholar
  16. Gaertner, S., & Bickman, L. (1971). Effects of race on the elicitation of helping behavior: The wrong number technique.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 20, 218–222.Google Scholar
  17. Giles, H. (1970). Evaluative reactions to accents.Educational Review, 22, 211–227.Google Scholar
  18. Giles, H. (1971). Ethnocentrism and the evaluation of accented speech.British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 10, 197–198.Google Scholar
  19. Giles, H. (1973). Accent mobility: A model and some data.Anthropological Linguistics, 15, 87–105.Google Scholar
  20. Giles, H., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1975). Linguistic assimilation among West Indian immigrants in a British city.Language Sciences, 38, 9–12.Google Scholar
  21. Giles, H., & Bourhis, R. Y. (1976). Black speakers with white speech—A real problem? In G. Nickel (Ed.),Proceedings of the Fourth International Congress of Applied Linguistics. Stuttgart: HochschulVerlag.Google Scholar
  22. Gumperz, J. J., & Herasimchuk, E. (1975). The conversational analysis of social meanings: A study of classroom interaction. In M. Sanches & B. B. Blount (Eds.),Sociocultural dimensions of language use. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Keenan, E. (1973).Conversational competence in children. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  24. Keenan, E. (1974).Again and again: The pragmatics of imitation in child language. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  25. Labov, W. (1964). Hypercorrection by the lower middle class as a factor in linguistic change. In W. Bright (Ed.),Proceedings of the UCLA Sociolinguistics Conference. Hawthorne, N.Y.: Mouton.Google Scholar
  26. Labov, W. (1965). Stages in the acquisition of standard English. In R. Shuy (Ed.),Social dialects and language learning. Champaign, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English.Google Scholar
  27. Labov, W. (1966).The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, D.C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  28. Labov, W. (1972).Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lambert, W. E. (1967). A social psychology of bilingualism.Journal of Social Issues, 23, 91–109.Google Scholar
  30. Lambert, W. E., Anisfeld, M., & Yeni-Komshian, G. (1965). Evaluative reactions of Jewish and Arab adolescents to dialect and language variation.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2, 84–90.Google Scholar
  31. Lambert, W. E., Frankel, H., & Tucker, G. R. (1966). Judging personality through speech: A French-Canadian example.Journal of Communications, 4, 305–321.Google Scholar
  32. Lambert, W. E., Hodgson, R. C., Gardner, R. C., & Fillenbaum, S. (1960). Evaluational reactions to spoken languages.Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 44–51.Google Scholar
  33. Lee, R. R. (1971). Dialect perception: A critical review and re-evaluation.Quarterly Journal of Speech, 57, 410–417.Google Scholar
  34. Levine, L., & Crockett, H. J., Jr. (1966). Speech variation in a Piedmont community: Postvocalic r. In S. Lieberson (Ed.),Exploration in Sociolinguistics (Sociological Inquiry, 36 (2)).Google Scholar
  35. Markel, N. N., Eisler, R. M., & Reese, H. W. (1967). Judging personality from dialect.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 33–35.Google Scholar
  36. Mejía Mejía, F. (1973). Personal communication.Google Scholar
  37. Mitchell-Kernan, C., & Kernan, K. (1975). Children's insults: America and Samoa. In M. Sanches & B. B. Blount (Eds.),Sociocultural dimensions of language use. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Osgood, C., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957),The measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  39. Powesland, P., & Giles, H. (1975). Persuasiveness and accent-message incompatibility.Human Relations, 28, 85–93.Google Scholar
  40. Scotton, C. M. (1972).Choosing a lingua franca in an African capital. Edmonton: Linguistic Research.Google Scholar
  41. Seligson, M. A. (1980).Peasants of Costa Rica and the development of agrarian capitalism. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  42. Seligson, M. A., & Berk-Seligson, S. (1978). Language and political behavior: A methodology for utilizing the linguistic component of socioeconomic status.American Journal of Political Science, 22, 713–741.Google Scholar
  43. Shuy, R. W. (1968).A study of social dialects in Detroit. Final Report, Project No. 6-1347. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education; Bureau of Research.Google Scholar
  44. Shuy, R. W., Wolfram, W. A. & Riley, W. K. (1967).Linguistic correlates of social stratification in Detroit speech. Cooperative Research Project No. 6-1347. Washington, D.C.: Office of Education.Google Scholar
  45. Trudgill, P. (1972). Sex, covert prestige and linguistic change in the urban British English of Norwich.Language in Society, 1, 179–195.Google Scholar
  46. Trudgill, P. (1974).The social differentiation of English in Norwich. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Tucker, G. R., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). White and Negro listeners' reactions to various American-English dialects. In Joshua A. Fishman (Ed.),Advances in the sociology of language (Vol. 2). The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
  48. Williams, F., Hewett, N., Miller, L., Naremore, R., & Whitehead, J. L. (1972).Explorations of the linguistic attitudes of teachers. Rowley, Massachussetts: Newbury House.Google Scholar
  49. Wolck, W. (1973). Attitudes toward Spanish and Quechua in bilingual Peru. In R. Shuy & R. Fasold (Eds)Language attitudes: Current trends and prospects. Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Wolfram, W. A. (1969).A sociolinguistic description of Detroit Negro speech. Washington, D. C.: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  51. Wolfram, W. A., & Christian, D. (1976).Appalachian speech. Arlington, Virginia: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
  52. Wolfram, W. A., & Fasold, R. (1974).The study of social dialect in American English. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1984

Authors and Affiliations

  • Susan Berk-Seligson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Foreign Languages and LiteraturesPurdue UniversityWest Lafayette

Personalised recommendations