Behavior Genetics

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 343–362 | Cite as

Recruitment bias in twin research: The rule of two-thirds reconsidered

  • D. T. Lykken
  • M. McGue
  • A. Tellegen
Article

Abstract

A review of recent studies of adult volunteer twins confirms an earlier report that, in such studies, male and dizygotic twin pairs are underre-presented. The Martin and Wilson [(1982). Behav. Genet.12:467–472] model of recruitment bias assumes that individuals who are twins respond to recruitment in the same way that singletons do. It is argued that twins recruited for twin studies may be influenced by additional factors, and evidence in support of this view is presented. The consequences of the augmented model. illustrated by Monte Carlo methods, suggests the following conclusions: (1) recruitment bias can have unpredictable and sometimes large effects in the form of under- or, more likely, overestimation of the true twin correlations; (2) these effects will tend to be larger among dizygotic, than among monozygotic, twins; and (3) differential recruitment bias is likely to be accompanied by monozygotic (MZ): dizygotic (DZ) differences in the total variance of the traits measured. Showing that the dependent variable has as large a variance in the twin sample as in the reference population, or that the means and variances of the MZ and DZ samples are similar, provides considerable reassurance that the sample statistics may be representative.

Key Words

recruitment bias twin studies twin similarity 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aitken, A. C. (1934). Notes on selection from a multivariate normal population.Proc. Edinburough Math. Soc. B 4:106–110.Google Scholar
  2. Berg, K. (1984). Twin studies of coronary heart disease and its risk factors.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 33:349–361.Google Scholar
  3. Bulmer, M. G. (1970).The Biology of Twinning in Man, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Chen, C. J., Cohen, B. H., Diamond, E. L., Lin, T. M., and Chen, J. S. (1984). Genetic variance and heritability of cardiovascular risk factors in Chinese adolescent twins.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 33:364–370.Google Scholar
  5. Clarke, P., Jardine, R., Martin, N. G., Stark, A. E., and Walsh, R. J. (1980). Sex differences in the inheritance of some anthropometric characters in twins.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 29:171–192.Google Scholar
  6. Cobb, M. J., Blizard, R. A., Fulker, D. W., and Murray, R. M. (1984). Preliminary findings from a study of the effects of a challenge dose of alcohol in male twins.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 33:451–456.Google Scholar
  7. Dal Colletto, G. M. D., Krieger, H., and Magalhaes, J. R. (1983). Genetic and environmental determination of 17 Serum biochemical traits in Brazilian twins.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 32:23–29.Google Scholar
  8. Darlu, P., Michotte, Y., Defrise-Gussenhoven, E., and Henrotte, J. (1981). The inheritance of plasma and red blood cell magnesium and zinc levels studied from twin and Family data.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 30:67–75.Google Scholar
  9. Eaves, L. J., Last, K. A., Young, P. A., and Martin, N. G. (1978). Model-fitting approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Heredity 41:249–320.Google Scholar
  10. Hemon, D., Berger, C., and Lazar, P. (1981). Some observations concerning the decline of dizygotic twinning rate in France between 1901 and 1968.Twin Res. 3C:49–56.Google Scholar
  11. James, W. H. (1972). Secular changes in dizygotic twinning rates.J. Biosoc. Sci. 4:427–434.Google Scholar
  12. James, W. H. (1979). Is Weinberg's differential rule valid?Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 28:69–71.Google Scholar
  13. Jardine, R., and Martin, N. G. (1984). Causes of variation in drinking habits in a large twin sample.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 33:435–450.Google Scholar
  14. Jeanneret, O., and MacMahon, B. (1962). Secular changes in rates of multiple births in the United States.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 14:410–465.Google Scholar
  15. Johnson, N. L., and Kotz, S. (1969).Continuous Univariate Distributions. I, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Kaprio, J., Sarna, S., Koskenvuo, M., and Rantasalo, I. (1978). The Finnish twin registry: Formation and compilation, questionnaire study, zygosity determination procedures, and research program. In Gedda, L., Parisi, P., and Nance, W. E. (eds.),Twin Research: Biology and Epidemiology, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 179–184.Google Scholar
  17. Lykken, D. T., Tellegen, A., and DeRubeis, R. (1978). Volunteer bias in twin research: The rule of two-thirds.Soc. Biol. 25:1–9.Google Scholar
  18. Martin, N. G., and Wilson, S. R. (1982). Bias in the estimation of heritability from truncated samples of twins.Behav. Genet. 12:467–472.Google Scholar
  19. Medlund, P., Cederlof, R., Floderus-Myrhed, B., Friberg, L., and Sorensen, S. (1977). A new Swedish twin registry.Acta Med. Scand. Suppl. 600.Google Scholar
  20. Mendell, N. R., and Elston, R. C. (1974). Multifactorial qualitative traits: Genetic analysis of prediction of recurrence risks.Biometrics 30:41–57.Google Scholar
  21. Milner, J., Christian, J. C., and Hewitt, D. (1980). Plasma lipid variability in the Toronto Twin Register.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 29:299–302.Google Scholar
  22. Rice, J., Reich, T., and Cloninger, C. R. (1979). An approximation to the multivariate normal integral: Its application to multifactorial qualitative traits.Biometrics 35:451–459.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1975).The Volunteer Subject, Wiley-Interscience, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Rushton, J. P., Fulker, D. W., Neale, M. C., Blizard, R. A., and Eysenck, H. J. (1984). Altruism and genetics.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 33:265–271.Google Scholar
  25. Springer, S. P., and Searleman, A. (1978). The ontogeny of hemispheric specialization: Evidence from dichotic listening in twins.Neuropsychologia 16:269–281.Google Scholar
  26. Susanne, C., Defrise-Gussenhoven, E., Van Wanseele, P., and Tassin, A. (1983). Genetic and environmental factors in head and face measurements of Belgian twins.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 32:229–238.Google Scholar
  27. Torgersen, S. (1980). Hereditary-environmental differentiation of general neurotic, obsessive, and impulsive hysterical personality types.Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol. 29:193–207.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1987

Authors and Affiliations

  • D. T. Lykken
    • 1
  • M. McGue
    • 2
  • A. Tellegen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry, Mayo HospitalUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolis

Personalised recommendations