Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 14, Issue 3, pp 317–329 | Cite as

How to tell the time in Hebrew

  • Benny Shanon
Article

Abstract

A corpus of expressions specifying time, length, and price in modern Hebrew was collected. The corpus reveals systematic morphological patterns that are at the same time complex and consistent both within and across informants. Further check revealed that informants are totally unaware of the rules governing these patterns. Indeed, these rules are not specified in the literature (grammar books, instruction texts, or language manuals) either. The systematic patterns of verbal behavior coupled with informants' total ignorance of the rules governing them are taken as an empirical demonstration of the contrast between “knowing how” and “knowing that.” The contrast is significant in that it pertains not to abstract formal rules (like the syntactic rules with which the contrast is standardly associated) but rather to concrete rules of morphology.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Chomsky, N. (1965).Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations.Behavioral, and Brain Sciences, 3, 1–61.Google Scholar
  3. Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G., & Garrett, M. F. (1974).The psychology of language. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Quine, W. V. (1974). Methodological reflections on current linguistic theory. In G. Harman (Ed.),On Noam Chomsky: Critical essays. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  5. Ryle, G. (1949).The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  6. Shanon, B. (in press). The myth of the box and the package.Biology and Cognition.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benny Shanon
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe Hebrew UniversityJerusalemIsrael

Personalised recommendations