Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

A chromosome substitution analysis of geotactic maze behavior inDrosophila melanogaster

  • 40 Accesses

  • 14 Citations

Abstract

Positive and negative geotactic maze behaviors were selected in strains of Drosophila melanogaster, for over 40 generations on 15-unit classification mazes. A chromosome substition analysis of these behaviors was undertaken to determine which of the three major chromosomes is most important in causing the differences in geotactic maze behavior between the divergent strains. By following the appropriate mating scheme, every possible homozygous chromosomal combination of the X, II, and III chromosomes from the geopositive and geonegative strain was produced. Heterozygous combinations were also produced to test for dominance and interchromosomal interactions. The results indicate that all three chromosomes are involved in geotactic behavior. The order of importance was II>III>X. Dominance effects were found in females for the X chromosome from the geopositive strain and for the III chromosome from the geonegative strain. No evidence for interchromosomal interactions was uncovered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L., Hirsch, J., and Weiss, J. M. (1962). Studies in experimental behavior genetics. III. Selection and hybridization analyses of individual differences in the sign of geotaxis.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 55:722–731.

  2. Hirsch, J. (1959). Studies in experimental behavior genetics. II. Individual differences in geotaxis as a function of chromosome variations in synthesizedDrosophila populations.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 52, 304–308.

  3. Hirsch, J., and Erlenmeyer-Kimling, L. (1962). Studies in experimental behavior genetics. IV. Chromosome analyses for geotaxis.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 55:732–739.

  4. Hirsch, J., and Ksander, G. (1969). Studies in experimental behavior genetics. V. Negative geotaxis and further chromosome analyses inDrosophila melanogaster.J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 67:118–122.

  5. Kearsey, M. J., and Kojima, K. (1967). The genetic architecture of body weight and egg hatchability inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 56:23–37.

  6. Walton, P. (1968). The genetics of geotaxis inDrosophila melanogaster.Can. J. Genet. Cytol. 10:673–687.

  7. Watanabe, T., and Anderson, W. (1976). Selection for geotaxis inDrosophila melanogaster: Heritability, degree of dominance, and correlated responses to selection.Behav. Genet. 6:71–86.

  8. Woolf, C. (1972). Genetic analyses of geotactic and phototactic behavior in selected strains ofDrosophila pseudoobscura.Behav. Genet. 2:93–106.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

This work was supported by NIH Grants GM01433 and GM19583 with partial support from NIH Grant GM 18690.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pyle, D. A chromosome substitution analysis of geotactic maze behavior inDrosophila melanogaster . Behav Genet 8, 53–64 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067704

Download citation

Key Words

  • Drosophila melanogaster
  • geotaxis
  • chromosome analysis
  • dominance effects