Behavior Genetics

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 51–58

Factors modulating preferences of female house mice for males differing in t-complex genotype: Role of t-complex genotype, genetic background, and estrous condition of females

  • Jessie R. Williams
  • Sarah Lenington
Article

Abstract

The present study investigates factors mediating odor and social preferences in female house mice (Muc domesticus) based on the t-complex geontype of males. Previous studies in this laboratory showed that females prefer the odors of wild-type (+/+) males over those that carry lethal genes (+/t). The purpose of this study was to determine the genetic, hormonal, and environmental factors that regulate these preferences. The variables examined include t-complex genotype, genetic background, estrous condition of test females (+/+ or +/t), and genotype of the test female's parents. Results indicate that female preferences for +/+ males are dependent upon the t-complex genotype and estrous condition of test females. Only +/t females in estrus showed preferences for +/+ males. Estrous cycle condition effects were seen in both wild (+/+w5) and inbred (129 +/tw5)females. Homozygous females (+/+) and diestrous females of both geno-types did not demonstrate preferences for either +/+ or +/t males.

Key Words

t-complex t haplotype odor preference estrous condition mouse Mus domesticus sexual selection 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bennett, D. (1975). The T-locus of the mouse.Cell 6:441–454.Google Scholar
  2. Bennett, D. (1978). Poplulation genetics of T/t complex mutations. In Morse, H. (ed.),Origins of Inbred Mice, Academic Press, New York, pp. 615–632.Google Scholar
  3. Bruck, D. (1957). Male segregation ratio advantage as a factor maintaining lethal alleles in wild populations of house mice.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 43:152–158.Google Scholar
  4. Coopersmith, C. B., and Lenington, S. (1992). Female preferences based on male quality in house mice: Interaction between male dominance rank and t-complex genotype.Ethology 90:1–16.Google Scholar
  5. Egid, K., and Brown, J. (1989). The major histocompatibility complex and female mating preferences in mice.Anim. Behav. 38:548–550.Google Scholar
  6. Franks, P., and Lenington, S. (1986). Dominance and reproductive behavior of wild house mice in a seminatural environment correlated with T locus genotype.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18:395–404.Google Scholar
  7. Houde, A. E. (1988). Genetic differences in female choice between two guppy populations.Anim. Behav. 36:510–516.Google Scholar
  8. Huck, U. W., and Banks, E. M. (1982). Differential attraction of females to dominant males: Olfactory discrimination and mating preference in the brown lemming (Lemmus trimucronatus).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 11:217–222.Google Scholar
  9. Lenington, S. (1983). Social preferences for partners carrying “good genes” in wild house mice.Anim. Behav. 31:325–333.Google Scholar
  10. Lenington, S., and Egid, K. (1985). Female discrimination of male odors correlated with male genotype at the T locus: A response to T-locus of H-2 locus variability?Behav. Genet. 15:53–67.Google Scholar
  11. Lenington, S., and Egid, K. (1989). Environmental influences on the preferences of wild female house mice for males of differing t-complex genotypes.Behav. Genet. 19:257–266.Google Scholar
  12. Lenington, S., Egid, K., and Williams, J. (1988). Analysis of a genetic recognition system in wild house mice.Behav. Genet. 18:549–564.Google Scholar
  13. Lenington, S., and Heisler, I. L. (1991). Behavorial reduction in the transmission of deleterious t haplotypes by wild house mice.Am. Nat. 137:366–378.Google Scholar
  14. Mainardi, M., and Pasquali, A. (1973). Socio-sexual preferences of the female house mouse (Mus musculus) in relation to the social status of the mouse.Ateneo Parmese 9:2–12.Google Scholar
  15. Potts, W., Manning, C. J., and Wakeland, E. (1991). Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype.Nature 352:619–621.Google Scholar
  16. Snedecor, G. W., and Cochran, W. G. (1967).Statistical Methods, Iowa State University Press, Ames.Google Scholar
  17. Yamakaki, K., Beauchamp, G. K., Kupniewski, D., Bard, J., Thomas, L., and Boyse, E. A. (1988). Familial imprinting determines H-2 selective mating preference.Science 240:1331–1332.Google Scholar
  18. Williams, J. R. (1989).Social and Sexual Preferences in Wild House Mice (Mus Domesticus)Based on Genetic Differences Between Conspecifics: Preferences Based on T-Haplotype and Population Membership, Dissertation.Google Scholar
  19. Williams, J. R., Catania, K. C., and Carter, C. S. (1992). Development of partner preferences in female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster): The role of social and sexual experience.Horm. Behav. 26:339–349.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jessie R. Williams
    • 1
  • Sarah Lenington
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute of Animal BehaviorRutgers UniversityNewark
  2. 2.Zoology DepartmentUniversity of MarylandCollege Park

Personalised recommendations