Behavior Genetics

, Volume 23, Issue 1, pp 29–50

Testing hypotheses about direction of causation using cross-sectional family data

  • A. C. Heath
  • R. C. Kessler
  • M. C. Neale
  • J. K. Hewitt
  • L. J. Eaves
  • K. S. Kendler
Article

Abstract

We review the conditions under which cross-sectional family data (e.g., data on twin pairs or adoptees and their adoptive and biological relatives) are informative about direction of causation. When two correlated traits have rather different modes of inheritance (e.g., family resemblance is determined largely by family background for one trait and by genetic factors for the other trait), cross-sectional family data will allow tests of strong unidirectional causal hypotheses (A and B are correlated “because of the causal influence of A on B” versus “because of the causal influence of B on A”) and, under some conditions, also of the hypothesis of reciprocal causation. Possible sources of errors of inference are considered. Power analyses are reported which suggest that multiple indicator variables will be needed to ensure adequate power of rejecting false models in the presence of realistic levels of measurement error. These methods may prove useful in cases where conventional methods to establish causality, by intervention, by prospective study, or by measurement of instrumental variables, are infeasible economically, ethically or practically.

Key Words

Twins reciprocal causation genetics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell, R. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization.Psychol. Rev. 75:81–95.Google Scholar
  2. Bollen, K. A. (1989).Structural Equations with Latent Variables; John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Breslau, N. (1991). Nicotine dependence, major depression, and anxiety in young adults.Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 48:1069–1074.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, G. W., and Harris, T. O. (1978).Social Origins of Depression: A Study of Psychiatric Disorder in Women, Tavistock, London.Google Scholar
  5. Browne, M. W. (1984). Asymptotically distribution-free methods for the analysis of covariance structures.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 37:1–21.Google Scholar
  6. Bulmer, M. G. (1980).The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, D. T. (1963). From description to experimentation: Interpreting trends from quasi-experiments. In Harris, C. W. (ed.),Problems in Measuring Change, University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp. 212–242.Google Scholar
  8. Cardon, L. R., Fulker, D. W., and Joreskog, K. G. (1991). A LISREL model with constrained parameters for twin and adoptive families.Behav. Genet. 21:327–350.Google Scholar
  9. Carey, G. (1986). Sibling imitation and contrast effects.Behav. Genet. 16:319–342.Google Scholar
  10. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Feldman, M. W. (1981).Cultural Transmission and Evolution: A Quantitative Approach; Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Cloninger, C. R., Rice, J., and Reich, T. (1979). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 31:178–188.Google Scholar
  12. Costner, H. L., and Schoenberg, R. (1973). Diagnosing indicator ills in multiple indicator models. In Goldberger, A. S., and Duncan, O. D. (eds.),Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, Seminar Press, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Duffy, D. A., and Martin, N. G. (1993). Inferring the direction of causation in cross-sectional twin data: Theoretical and empirical considerations.Genet. Epidemiol. (in press).Google Scholar
  14. Duncan, O. D. (1969). Some linear models for two-wave, two-variable panel analysis.Psychol. Bull. 72:177–182.Google Scholar
  15. Eaves, L. J. (1969). The genetic analysis or continuous variation: A comparison of experimental designs applicable to human data.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 23:131–147.Google Scholar
  16. Eaves, L. J. (1970).Aspects of Human Psychogenetics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.Google Scholar
  17. Eaves, L. J. (1976). A model for siblings effects in man.Heredity 36:205–214.Google Scholar
  18. Eaves, L. J. (1977). Interring the causes of human variation.J. Roy. Stat. Soc. A. 140:324–355.Google Scholar
  19. Eaves, L. J., and Gale, J. S. (1974). A method for analyzing the genetic basis of covariation.Behav. Genet 4:253–267.Google Scholar
  20. Eaves, L. J., and Eysenck, H. J. (1975). The nature of extraversion: A genetical analysis.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 32:102–112.Google Scholar
  21. Eaves, L. J., Eysenck, H., and Martin, N. G. (1989).Genes, Culture and Personality: An Empirical Approach, Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  22. Eaves, L. J., Last, K. A., Martin, N. G., and Jinks, J. L. (1977). A progressive approach to non-additivity and genotype-environmental covariance in the analysis of human differences.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 30:1–42.Google Scholar
  23. Eaves, L. J., Last, K. A., Young, P. A., and Martin, N. G. (1978). Model-fitting approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Heredity 41:249–320.Google Scholar
  24. Eaves, L. J., Heath, A. C., Neale, M. C., Hewitt, J. K., and Martin, N. G. (1992). Sex differences and non-additivity in the effects of genes on personality (unpublished manuscript).Google Scholar
  25. Eisen, S. A., Goldberg, J., True, W., and Henderson, W. G. (1991). A cotwin-control study of the effects of the Vietnam war on the self-reported health of veterans.Am. J. Epidemiol. 134:49–59.Google Scholar
  26. Falconer, D. S. (1960).Quantitative Genetics, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  27. Fisher, R. A. (1918). The correlation between relatives on the supposition of Mendelian inheritance.Trans. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh 53:399–433.Google Scholar
  28. Fisher, R. A. (1958) Cancer and smoking.Nature 182:596.Google Scholar
  29. Fulker, D. W. (1982). Extensions of the classical twin method.Proceedings of the 1981 International Congress of Human Genetics, Jerusalem, Alan R. Liss, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Fulker, D. W. (1988). Genetic and cultural transmission in human behavior. In Wier, B. S., Eisen, E. J., Goodman, M. M., and Namkoong, G. (eds.),Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Quantitative Genetics, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.Google Scholar
  31. Fulker, D. W., and DeFries, J. C. (1983). Genetic and environmental transmission in the Colorado Adoption Project: Path analysis.Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 36:175–188.Google Scholar
  32. Harman, H. H. (1976).Modern Factor Analysis, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  33. Heath, A. C. (1983).Human Quantitative Genetics: Some Issues and Applications, Unpublished D.Phil. dissertation, University of Oxford, Oxford.Google Scholar
  34. Heath, A. C. (1990). How twin data can resolve the direction of causation: PBI and depression in American twins. Presented at Vulnerability Factors in Neurosis: What Causes What Conference, University of New South Wales, Sept.Google Scholar
  35. Heath, A. C. (1993). Genetic influences on drinking behavior in humans. In Begleiter, H., and Kissin B. (eds.),Alcohol and Alcoholism, Vol. 1, Genetic Factors and Alcoholism, Oxford University Press, Oxford (in press).Google Scholar
  36. Heath, A. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1985). Resolving the effects of phenotype and social background on mate selection.Behav. Genet. 15:15–30.Google Scholar
  37. Heath, A. C., and Martin, N. G. (1991a). The inheritance of alcohol sensitivity and of patterns of alcohol use.Alcohol Alcohol.Suppl. 1:141–145.Google Scholar
  38. Heath, A. C., and Martin, N. G. (1991b). Intoxication after an acute dose of alcohol. An assessment of its association with alcohol consumption patterns by using twin data.Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 15:122–128.Google Scholar
  39. Heath, A. C., Kendler, K. S., Eaves, L. J., and Markell, D. (1985). The resolution of cultural and biological inheritance: Informativeness of different relationships.Behav. Genet. 15:439–465.Google Scholar
  40. Heath, A. C., Neale, M. C., Hewitt, J. K., Eaves, L. J., and Fulker, D. W. (1989a). Testing structural equation models for twin data using LISREL.Behav. Genet. 19:9–35.Google Scholar
  41. Heath, A. C., Eaves, L. J., and Martin, N. G. (1989b). The genetic structure of personality III. Multivariate genetic item analysis of the EPQ scales.Personal. Indiv. Diff. 10:877–888.Google Scholar
  42. Heath, A. C., Cates, R., Martin, N. G., Meyer, J., Hewitt, J. K., Neale, M. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1992). Genetic contribution to risk of smoking initiation: Comparisons across birth cohorts and across cultures (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  43. Jinks, J. L., and Fulker, D. W. (1970). Comparison of the biometrical, genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Psychol. Bull. 73:311–349.Google Scholar
  44. Johnston, J. J. (1972).Econometric Methods, 2nd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Joreskog, K. (1978). The structural analysis of covariance matrics.Psychometrika 43:443–477.Google Scholar
  46. Joreskog, K., and Sorbom, D. (1988).LISREL VII: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships, Scientific Software, Mooresvill, IN.Google Scholar
  47. Kendler, K. S., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., and Eaves, L. J. (1987). Symptoms of anxiety and symptoms of depression: Same genes, different environments?Arch. Gen. Psychiat. 44:451–457.Google Scholar
  48. Kendler, K. S., Silberg, J. L., Neale, M. C., Kessler, R. C., Heath, A. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1991). The family history method: whose psychiatric history is measured?Am. J. Psychiat. 148:1501–1504.Google Scholar
  49. Kendler, K. S., Eaves, L. J., Neale, M. C., Heath, A. C., and Kessler, R. C. (1992). Smoking and depression: A causal analysis (submitted for publication).Google Scholar
  50. Kenny, D. A. (1975). Cross-lagged panel correlation: A test for spuriousness.Psychol. Bull. 82:887–903.Google Scholar
  51. Kessler, R. C. (1983). Methodological issues in the study of psychosocial stress. In Kaplan, H. B. (ed.),Psychosocial Stress: Trends in Theory and Research, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  52. Kessler, R. C., and Greenberg, D. F. (1981).Linear Panel Analysis: Quantitative Models for Change, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  53. Kessler, R. C., Kendler, K. S., Heath, A. C., Neale, M. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1992). Social support, depressed mood, and adjustment to stress: A genetic epidemiologic investigation.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 62:257–272.Google Scholar
  54. Lange, K. L., Westlake, J., and Spence, M. A. (1976). Extension to pedigree analysis. III. Variance components by the scoring method.Ann. Hum. Genet. 39:485–491.Google Scholar
  55. Locasio, J. J. (1982). The cross-lagged correlation technique: Reconsideration in terms of an exploratory utility, assumption specification and robustness.Educ. Psychol. Measure. 42:1023–1036.Google Scholar
  56. Loehlin, J. C. (1978). Heredity-environment analyses of I.Q. correlations.Behav. Genet. 26:415–436.Google Scholar
  57. McArdle, J. J., and Goldsmith, H. H. (1990). Alternative common-factor models for multivariate biometric analyses.Behav. Genet. 12:467–472.Google Scholar
  58. Martin, N. G., and Eaves, L. J. (1977). The genetical analysis of covariance structure.Heredity 38:79–95.Google Scholar
  59. Martin, N. G., and Heath, A. C. (1991). Parental bonding and depression: What causes what? Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Behavior Genetics Association, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
  60. Martin, N. G., Eaves, L. J., Kearsey, M. J., and Davies, P. (1978). The power of the classical twin study.Heredity 40:97–116.Google Scholar
  61. Martin, N. G., Oakeshott, J. G., Gibson, J. B., Starmer, G. A., Perl, J., and Wilks, A. V. (1985a). A twin study of psychomotor and physiological response to an acute dose of alcohol.Behav. Genet. 15:305–347.Google Scholar
  62. Martin, N. G., Perl, J., Oakeshott, J. G., Gibson, J. B., Starmer, G. A., and Wilks, A. V. (1985b). A twin study of ethanol metabolism.Behav. Genet. 15:93–100.Google Scholar
  63. Mather, K., and Jinks, J. L. (1971).Biometrical Genetics: The Study of Continuous Variation, Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
  64. Matsueda, R. L., and Bielby, W. T. (1986). Statistical power in covariance structure models. In Tuma, N. B., (ed.),Sociological Methodology 1986, American Sociological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 120–158.Google Scholar
  65. Neale, M. C., and Cardon, L. (1992).Methodology for Genetic Studies of Twins and Families, NATO ASI Series, Kluwer.Google Scholar
  66. Neale, M. C., Heath, A. C., Hewitt, J. K., Eaves, L. J., and Fulker, D. W. (1989a). Fitting genetic models with LISREL: Hypothesis testing.Behav. Genet. 19:37–49.Google Scholar
  67. Neale, M., Hewitt, J. K., Heath, A. C., and Eaves, L. J. (1989b). The power of multivariate and categorical twin studies. Presented at the 6th International Congress of Twin Studies, Rome.Google Scholar
  68. Neale, M. C., Walters, E., Health, A. C., Kessler, R. C., Perusse, D., Eaves, L. J., and Kendler, K. S. (1993). Depression and parental bonding: Cause, consequence, or genetic covariance?Genet. Epidemiol. (in press).Google Scholar
  69. Parker, G. (1983).Parental Overprotection: A Risk Factor in Psychosocial Development, Grune & Stratton, New York.Google Scholar
  70. Parker, G. (1990). The Parental Bonding Instrument: Psychometric properties reviewed.Psychiat. Dev. 4:317–335.Google Scholar
  71. Pearson, E. S., and Hartley, E. O. (1972).Biometrika Tables for Statisticians, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  72. Plomin, R., and Bergeman, C. S. (1991). The nature of nurture: Genetic influence on environmental measures.Behav. Brain Sci. 84:309–332.Google Scholar
  73. Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C., and Loehlin, J. L. (1977). Genotype-environment interaction and correlation in the analysis of human variation.Psychol. Bull. 84:309–322.Google Scholar
  74. Rice, J., Cloninger, C. R., and Reich, T. (1978). Multifactorial inheritance with cultural transmission and assortative mating. I. Description and basic properties of the unitary models.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 30:618–643.Google Scholar
  75. Rogosa, D. A. (1980). A critique of cross-lagged correlation.Psychol. Bull. 88:245–258.Google Scholar
  76. Satorra, A., and Saris, W. E. (1985). Power of the likelihood-ratio test in covariance structure analysis.Psychometrika 50:83–90.Google Scholar
  77. Schieken, R. M., Eaves, L. J., Hewitt, J. K., Mosteller, M., Bodurtha, J. N., Moscowitz, W. B., and Nance, W. E. (1989). Univariate genetic analysis of blood pressure in children (The Medical College of Virginia Twin Study).Am. J. Cardiol. 64:1333–1337.Google Scholar
  78. Wright, S. (1968).Evolution and the Genetics of Populations, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  79. Yamaguchi, K., and Kandel, D. B. (1984). Patterns of drug use from adolescence to adulthood. II. Sequences of progression.Am. J. Public Health 74:668–672.Google Scholar
  80. Yarrow, L. J. (1963). Research in dimensions of early maternal care.Merrill-Palmer Q.9:101–114.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Heath
    • 1
  • R. C. Kessler
    • 2
  • M. C. Neale
    • 3
  • J. K. Hewitt
    • 3
  • L. J. Eaves
    • 3
    • 4
  • K. S. Kendler
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Departments of Psychiatry, Psychology, and GeneticsWashington University School of MedicineSt. Louis
  2. 2.Institute for Social ResearchUniversity of MichiganAnn Arbor
  3. 3.Department of Human GeneticsMedical College of VirginiaRichmond
  4. 4.Department of PsychiatryMedical College of VirginiaRichmond

Personalised recommendations