Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

How an unfamiliar thing should be called

  • 30 Accesses

  • 3 Citations

Abstract

An empirical method is described to derive good names for unfamiliar objects. It is based on three principles: (1) The names should be within users' linguistic capacities; (2) names should be informationally efficient; (3) names should form a classification system. The principles lead to a three-step method: (1) Subjects generate names for the objects; (2) a subset of the names, which fulfills the principles, is selected; (3) how good the names are is tested by matching and recall tasks. Steps 2 and 3 are iterated to improve the nnames. The names that result are natural, short, easily matched with their physical referents, and well recalled. The method is generalizable and ought to be useful in a large variety of situations where names for unfamiliar objects are needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Brown, R. How shall a thing be called?Psychological Review, 1958,65, 14–21.

  2. Carroll, J. M. The role of context in creating names.Discourse Processes, 1980,3, 1–24.

  3. Carroll, J. M. Creating names for things.Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1981,10(4), 441–455.

  4. Nelson, K. Concept, word, and sentence.Psychological Review, 1974,81, 267–285.

  5. Nelson, K. The conceptual basis for naming. In J. Macnamara (Ed.),Language, learning and thought. New York: Academic Press, 1977.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Patricia Baggett.

Additional information

This research was supported by the Office of Naval Research Contract No. N00014-78-C-0433 to the first author. This report is No. 111 of the Institute of Cognitive Science's Technical Report Series.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baggett, P., Ehrenfeucht, A. How an unfamiliar thing should be called. J Psycholinguist Res 11, 437–445 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067492

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Classification System
  • Empirical Method
  • Recall Task
  • Unfamiliar Object