Behavior Genetics

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 337–341

Is the gender difference in mental rotation disappearing?

  • Mary Soares Masters
  • Barbara Sanders
Article

Abstract

Several investigators have used meta-analysis to compare the results of studies of gender differences on various spatial tests and have concluded that the magnitude of the gender difference in spatial ability is decreasing over time. The present study used meta-analytic techniques to compare the effect size (d) of the gender difference in 14 studies published from 1975 to 1992 which administered the Mental Rotations test to adolescents and young adults. Males scored significantly higher than females in all the studies. Analyses of thed's computed for the studies revealed that the magnitude of the gender difference on the mental Rotations test has remained stable over time. Neither the Pearson correlation relating thed's to the publication dates of the studies nor the Z test of the linear contrast relating the publication dates of hte studies to the effect sizes showed a linear change in the size of the gender difference over time. The finding of a stable gender difference on the Mental Rotations test argues against the general conclusion that the gender difference in spatial ability is decreasing.

Key Words

Gender differences spatial ability effect sizes 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beatty, W. W., and Duncan, D. (1990). Relationship between performance on the Everyday Spatial Activities Test and on objective measures of spatial behavior in men and women.Bull. Psychon. Soc. 28:228–230.Google Scholar
  2. Block, J. H., and Block, J. (1980). The role of ego-control and ego-resiliency in the organization of behavior. In Collins, W. A. (ed.),Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, Vol. 13, pp. 39–101.Google Scholar
  3. Bouchard, T. J., and McGee, M. G. (1977). Sex differences in human spatial ability: Not an X-linked recessive gene effect.Soc. Biol. 24:332–335.Google Scholar
  4. Caplan, P. J., MacPherson, G. M., and Tobin, P. (1985). Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data.Am. Psychol. 40:786–799.Google Scholar
  5. Casey, M. B., and Brabeck, M. M. (1989). Exceptions to the male advantage on a spatial task: Family handedness and college major as factors identifying women who excel.Neuropsychologia 27:689–696.Google Scholar
  6. Cohen, J. (1977).Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, rev. ed., Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  7. Feingold, A. (1988). Cognitive gender differences are disappearing.Am. Psychol. 43:95–103.Google Scholar
  8. Freedman, R. J., and Rovegno, L. (1981). Ocular dominance, cognitive strategy, and sex differences in spatial ability.Percept. Motor Skills 52:651–654.Google Scholar
  9. Geary, D. C., Gilger, J. W., and Elliot-Miller, B. (1992). Gender differences in three-dimensional mental rotation: A replication.J. Genet. Psychol. 153:115–117.Google Scholar
  10. Geiringer, E. R., and Hyde, J. S. (1976). Sex differences on Piaget's Water-Level Task: Spatial ability incognito.Percept. Motor Skills 42:1323–1328.Google Scholar
  11. Gilger, J. W., and Ho, H. (1989). Gender differences in adult spatial information processing: Their relationship to pubertal timing, adolescent activities, and sex-typing of personality.Cognit. Dev. 4:197–214.Google Scholar
  12. Halpern, D. F. (1989). The disappearance of cognitive gender differences: What you see depends on where you look.Am. Psychol. 102:1156–1158.Google Scholar
  13. Hedges, L. V., and Olkin, I. (1985),Statistical Methods for Meta-analysis, Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  14. Hyde, J. S. (1981). How large are cognitive gender differences? A meta-analysis using ω2 andd.Am. Psychol. 36:892–901.Google Scholar
  15. Kerns, K. A., and Berenbaum, S. A. (1991). Sex differences in spatial ability in children.Behav. Genet. 21:383–396.Google Scholar
  16. Linn, M. C., and Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis.Child Dev. 56:1479–1498.Google Scholar
  17. Linn, M. C., and Petersen, A. C. (1986). A meta-analysis of gender differences in spatial ability: Implications for mathematics and science achievement. In Hyde, J. S., and Linn, M. C. (eds.),The Psychology of Gender. Advances Through Meta-analysis, John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 67–101.Google Scholar
  18. Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. (1974).The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  19. Mann, V. A., Sasanuma, S., Sakuma, N., and Masaki, S. (1990). Sex differences in cognitive abilities: A crosscultural perspective.Neuropsychologia 28:1063–1077.Google Scholar
  20. McGee, M. G. (1979). Human spatial abilities: Psychometric studies and environmental, genetic, hormonal, and neurological influences.Psychol. Bull. 86:889–918.Google Scholar
  21. Ozer, D. J. (1987). Personality, intelligence, and spatial visualization: Correlates of Mental Rotations test performance.J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 53:129–134.Google Scholar
  22. Pearson, J. L., and Ferguson, L. R. (1989). Gender differences in patterns of spatial ability, environmental cognition, and math and English achievement in late adolescence.Adolescence 24:421–431.Google Scholar
  23. Rosenthal, R., and Rosnow, R. L. (1984).Essentials of Behavioral Research. Methods and Data Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Rosenthal, R., and Rubin, D. B. (1982a). Further meta-analytic procedures for assessing cognitive gender differences.J. Educ. Psychol. 74:708–712.Google Scholar
  25. Rosenthal, R., and Rubin, D. B. (1982b). Comparing effect sizes of independent studies.Psychol. Bull. 92:500–504.Google Scholar
  26. Sanders, B., and Soares, M. P. (1986). Sexual maturation and spatial ability in college students.Dev. Psychol. 22:199–203.Google Scholar
  27. Sanders, B., Soares, M. P., and D'Aquila, J. M. (1982). The sex difference on one test of spatial visualization: A nontrivial difference.Child Dev. 53:1106–1110.Google Scholar
  28. Shepard, R., and Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science 171:701–703.Google Scholar
  29. Stumpf, H., and Klieme, E. (1989). Sex-related differences in spatial ability: More evidence for convergence.Percept. Motor Skills 69:915–921.Google Scholar
  30. Vandenberg, S. G. (1975). Sources of variance in performance of spatial tests. In Eliot, J. and Salkind, N.J. (eds.),Children's Spatial Development, Charles C Thomas, Spring-field, IL, pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
  31. Vandenberg, S. G., and Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental Rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.Percept. Motor Skills 47:599–604.Google Scholar
  32. Vandenberg, S. G., Kuse, A. R., and Vogler, G. P. (1985). Searching for correlates of spatial ability.Percept. Motor Skills 60:343–350.Google Scholar
  33. Wilson, J. R., and Vandenberg, S. G. (1978). Sex differences in cognition: Evidence from the Hawaii family study. In McGill, T. E., Dewsbury, D. A., and Sachs, B. D. (eds.),Sex and Behavior: Status and Perspectus, Plenum, New York, pp. 317–335.Google Scholar
  34. Yen, W. M. (1975). Sex-linked major-gene influences on selected types of spatial performance.Behav. Genet.,5:281–298.Google Scholar
  35. Yeo, R. A., and Cohen, D. B. (1983). Familial sinistrality and sex differences in cognitive abilities.Cortex 19:125–130.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Soares Masters
    • 1
  • Barbara Sanders
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologySan Jose State UniversitySan Jose
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, U-20University of ConnecticutStorrs

Personalised recommendations