Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Sentence processing: Evidence against the serial, independent stage assumption

  • 31 Accesses

  • 1 Citations

Abstract

The assumption that the processing stages involved in sentence comprehension are serially and independently executed was tested in two separate experiments using two new sentence types. One experiment was a sentence-picture verification task, the other was not. In Experiment I, subjects viewed sentences such as “It's false that the dots are red” and indicated, by pressing the appropriate response key, which of two colors would make the sentence true. In Experiment II, subjects verified sentences such as “It isn't true that the dots aren't red” against pictures of colored dots. On the strength of Sternberg's additive factor method, present findings challenge the validity of the serial, independent stage assumption, and results are alternatively discussed in terms of a capacity sharing model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Carpenter, P., and Just, M. (1975). Sentence comprehension: A psycholinguistic processing model of verification.Psychol. Rev. 82(1):45–73.

  2. Clark, H., and Chase, W. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures.Cognit. Psychol. 3:472–517.

  3. Howard, J. (1975). The attentional demands of negation in a memory scanning task.Mem. Cognit. 3(3):319–324.

  4. Krueger, L. (1972). Sentence-picture comparison: A test of additivity of processing time for feature matching and negation coding.J. Exp. Psychol. 95:275–284.

  5. Sherman, M. (1973). Bound to be easier? The negative prefix and sentence comprehension.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 12:76–84.

  6. Sherman, M. (1976). Adjectival negation and the comprehension of multiply negated sentences.J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 15:143–157.

  7. Stenberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donder's method.Acta Psychol. 30:276–315.

  8. Sternberg, S. (1975). Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies.Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 27:1–32.

  9. Townsend, J. (1971). A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.Percept. Psychophys. 10:161–163.

  10. Townsend, J. (1972). Some results concerning the identifiability of parallel and serial processes.Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 25:168–199.

  11. Trabasso, T., Rollins, H., and Shaughnessey, E. (1971). Storage and verification stages in processing concepts.Cognitive Psychol. 2:239–289.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Carol A. Vázquez.

Additional information

This research was supported by PHS research grant MH 23401 to Sam Glucksberg, principal investigator.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vázquez, C.A. Sentence processing: Evidence against the serial, independent stage assumption. J Psycholinguist Res 10, 363–374 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067164

Download citation

Keywords

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Present Finding
  • Separate Experiment
  • Processing Stage
  • Factor Method