Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 4, Issue 1, pp 1–28 | Cite as

Kinship correlations reported by Sir Cyril Burt

  • Arthur R. Jensen
Article

Abstract

All the kinship correlations (and their sample sizes) reported over a period of 30 years by Sir Cyril Burt are presented in tabular form. The kinships include identical twins reared together and apart, fraternal twins, siblings, parent-child, grandparent-grandchild, cousins, and others, more rare types of relationships. Burt's statistical methods and the procedures for testing and obtaining “final assessments” of mental ability are fully described, and the final assessments for Burt's 53 monozygotic twins reared apart are given in full. Misprints and inconsistencies in some of the data are noted, and recommendations are made for the presentation and preservation of kinship data secured by future researchers.

Key Words

Burt genetics intelligence relatives twins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bulmer, M. G. (1970).The Biology of Twinning, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Burt, C. (1921).Mental and Scholastic Tests, P. S. King, London (4th ed. 1962, Staples Press).Google Scholar
  3. Burt, C. (1923).Handbook of Tests for Use in Schools, King & Son, London (2nd ed. 1948, Staples Press).Google Scholar
  4. Burt, C. (1943). Ability and income.Brit. J. Educ. Psychol. 13: 83–98.Google Scholar
  5. Burt, C. (1955). The evidence for the concept of intelligence.Brit. J. Educ. Psychol. 25: 158–177.Google Scholar
  6. Burt, C. (1958). The inheritance of mental ability.Am. Psychologist,13: 1–15.Google Scholar
  7. Burt, C. (1966). The genetic determination of differences in intelligence: A study of monozygotic twins reared together and apart.Brit. J. Psychol. 57: 137–53.Google Scholar
  8. Burt, C. (1971). Quantitative genetics in psychology.Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 24: 1–21.Google Scholar
  9. Burt, C. (1972). Inheritance of general in telligence.Am. Psychologist 27: 175–190.Google Scholar
  10. Burt, C., and Howard, M. (1956). The multifactorial theory of inheritance and its application to intelligence.Brit. J. Stat. Psychol. 9: 95–131.Google Scholar
  11. Burt, C., and Howard, M. (1957). The relative influence of heredity and environment on assessments of intelligence.Brit. J. Stat. Psychol. 10: 99–104.Google Scholar
  12. Eaves, L. J. (1969). The genetic analysis of continuous variation: A comparison of experimental designs applicable to human data.Brit. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 22: 131–147.Google Scholar
  13. Fisher, R. A. (1934).Statistical Methods for Research Workers, Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  14. Haggard, E. A. (1958).Intraclass Correlation and the Analysis of Variance Dryden Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Honzik, M. P. (1957). Developmental studies of parent-child resemblance in intelligence.Child Develop. 28: 215–228.Google Scholar
  16. Jencks, C., Smith, M., Acland, H., Bane, M. J., Cohen, D., Gintis, H., Heyns, B., and Michelson, S. (1972).Inequality: A Reassessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America, Basic Books, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Jensen, A. R. (1968). Social class, race, and genetics: Implications for education.Am. Educ. Res. J. 5: 1–42.Google Scholar
  18. Jensen, A. R. (1970). IQs of identical twins reared apart.Behav. Genet. 1: 133–148.Google Scholar
  19. Jensen, A. R. (1972a), Sir Cyril Burt (obituary).Psychometrika 37: 115–117.Google Scholar
  20. Jensen, A. R. (1972b),Genetics and Education, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  21. Jinks, J. L., and Fulker, D. W. (1970). Comparison of the biometrical genetical, MAVA, and classical approaches to the analysis of human behavior.Psychol. Bull. 73: 311–349.Google Scholar
  22. Juel-Nielsen, N. (1965). Individual and environment: A psychiatric-psychological investigation of monozygous twins reared apart.Acta Psychiat. Neurol. Scand., Monogr. Suppl. 183.Google Scholar
  23. Manosevitz, M., Lindzey, G., and Thiessen, D. D. (1969).Behavioral Genetics: Method and Research, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York.Google Scholar
  24. Mather, K. (1964).Statistical Analysis in Biology, 5th ed., Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  25. Mather, K., and Jinks, J. L. (1971).Biometrical Genetics, 2nd ed., Chapman & Hall, London.Google Scholar
  26. McNemar, Q. (1938). Special review, Newman, Freeman, and Holzinger's twins: A study of heredity and environment.Psychol. Bull. 35: 237–249.Google Scholar
  27. Newman, H. H., Freeman, F. N., and Holzinger, K. J. (1937).Twins: A Study of Heredity and Environment, University of Chicago Pres, Chicago.Google Scholar
  28. Nichols, R. C., and Bilbro, W. C., Jr. (1966). The diagnosis of twin zygosity.Acta Genet. 16: 265–275.Google Scholar
  29. Pearson, K. (1901). Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution. IX: On the principle of homotyposis and its relation to heredity, to variability of the individual, and to that of race. Part I: Homotyposis in the vegetable kingdom.Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. (Lond.) Ser. A 197: 285–379.Google Scholar
  30. Schull, W. J., and Neel, J. V. (1965).The Effects of Inbreeding on Japanese Children, Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Shields, J. (1962).Monozygotic Twins Brought Up Apart and Brought Up Together, Oxford University Press, London.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1974

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arthur R. Jensen
    • 1
  1. 1.University of CaliforniaBerkeley

Personalised recommendations