Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 373–386 | Cite as

Identifying possible sources of inmate crowding in U.S. jails

  • John D. Wooldredge
Research Note

Abstract

This note presents results from an aggregate-level study of several possible correlates of inmate crowding in county jails during 1983 (n=505) and 1988 (n=522). Findings revealed that jurisdiction variables (court caseload, degree of urbanism) and state variables (sentencing practices, degree of prison inmate crowding) are at least as significant as jail variables (type of standards, frequency of inspections, enforcement system for standards, inmate population composition) for predicting the degree of inmate crowding. This suggests that policies designed to reduce crowding should be sophisticated enough to account for the possible effects of all three groups of variables.

Key words

aggregate level inmate crowding county jails 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allinson, R. (1982). Crisis in the Jails: Overcrowding is now a national epidemic.Correct. Mag. April: 18–24.Google Scholar
  2. Berry, B., and Kasarda, J. (1977).Contemporary Urban Ecology, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Bolduc, A. (1985). Jail crowding.Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 478: 47–57.Google Scholar
  4. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1983).National Jail Census: 1983, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  5. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1988).National Jail Census: 1988, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  6. Church, T. (1978).Justice Delayed: The Pace of Litigation in Urban Trial Courts, National Center for State Courts, Williamsburg, Va.Google Scholar
  7. Clear, T. and Cole, G. (1986).American Corrections, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, Calif.Google Scholar
  8. Etzioni, A. (1961).A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations, Free Press of Glencoe, Illinois.Google Scholar
  9. Fazio, E. T. (1984).Early Representation by Defense Counsel-Field Test, Final Report, URSA Institute, San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
  10. Flynn, E. E. (1973). Jails and criminal justice. In Ohlin, L. (ed.),Prisoners in America, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  11. Gist, N., and Fava, S. (1974).Urban Society, Harper and Row, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Greiner, L. E. (1967). Patterns of organizational change.Harvard Bus. Rev. 45: 119–128.Google Scholar
  13. Handberg, R. (1982). Jails and correctional farms: The neglected half of rural law enforcement.J. Correct. Educ. 32: 20–23.Google Scholar
  14. Hanushek, E. A., and Jackson, J. E. (1977).Statistical Methods for Social Scientists, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Heinzelman, F. (1984).Jail Drivers: Impact on the Criminal Justice System-Research in Brief, National Institute of Justice, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  16. Irwin, J. (1985).The Jail: Managing the Underclass in American Society, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  17. Jackson, P. G. (1988). The uses of jail confinement in three counties.Policy Stud. Rev. 7: 592–605.Google Scholar
  18. Juszkiewicz, J. (1988). Dealing effectively with crowded jails: The judge's role.Policy Stud. Rev. 7: 581–591.Google Scholar
  19. Kerle, K., and Ford, F. (1982).The State of Our Nation's Jails, National Sheriff`s Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Klofas, J. (1987). Patterns of jail use.J. Crim. Just. 15: 403–411.Google Scholar
  21. Klofas, J. (1990). Measuring jail use: A comparative analysis of local corrections.J. Res. Crime Delinq. 27: 295–317.Google Scholar
  22. Mattick, H. (1974). The contemporary jails of the United States: An unknown and neglected area of justice. In Glaser, D. (ed.),Handbook of Criminology, Rand McNally, Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Mays, G. L. (1989). The impact of federal sentencing guidelines on jail and prison overcrowding and early release. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, Washington, D.C., March 28–April 1.Google Scholar
  24. Mays, G. L., and Thompson, J. A. (1991). The political and organizational context of American jails. In Thompson, J. A., and Mays, G. L. (eds.),American Jails: Public Policy Issues, Nelson-Hall, Chicago.Google Scholar
  25. Moynahan, J. M. and Stewart, E. K. (1980).The American Jail: Its Growth and Development, Nelson-Hall, Chicago.Google Scholar
  26. Poole, E. D., and Pogrebin, M. R. (1991). Changing jail organization and management: Toward improved employee utilization. In Thompson, J. A., and Mays, G. L. (eds.),American Jails: Public Policy Issues, Nelson-Hall, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  27. Rothman, D. (1980).Conscience and Convenience, Little, Brown, Boston.Google Scholar
  28. Sykes, G., and Vito, G. (1987). Jail populations and crime rates: An exploratory analysis of incapacitation.J. Police Sci. Admin. 15: 72–77.Google Scholar
  29. Thompson, J. A., and Mays, G. L. (1988). State-local relations and the American jail crisis: An assessment of state jail mandates.Policy Stud. Rev. 7: 567–580.Google Scholar
  30. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1972).Census of Population and Housing: 1970, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  31. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1982).Census of Population and Housing: 1980, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  32. Weber, M. (1947).The Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Free Press of Glencoe, Glencoe, II.Google Scholar
  33. Zimring, F., and Hawkins, G. (1991).The Scale of Imprisonment, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • John D. Wooldredge
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Criminal Justice, French Hall (ML 108)University of CincinnatiCincinnati

Personalised recommendations