Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Familial resemblance for the Identical Blocks Test of spatial ability: No evidence for X linkage

Abstract

The Identical Blocks Test of spatial ability was administered to subsamples of the two largest ethnic groups tested in the Hawaii Family Study of Cognition—Americans of European ancestry (171 families) and Americans of Japanese ancestry (98 families). Results of a hierarchical multiple regression analysis of family data and correlational analyses provided no evidence to support the hypothesis that spatial ability is influenced by a major, X-linked, recessive gene. Thus it appears that recent failures to replicate the sex-linkage pattern obtained by Stafford (1961) are not due to differences in the tests employed. We suggest that alternative explanations should be sought for the well-known sex difference in spatial ability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ashton, G. C., Polovina, J. J., and Vandenberg, S. G. (1979). Segregation analysis of family data for 15 tests of cognitive ability.Behav. Genet. 9:329–347.

  2. Bock, R. D., and Kolakowski, D. (1973). Further evidence of sex-linked major-gene influence on human spatial visualizing ability.Am. J. Hum. Genet. 25:1–14.

  3. Bouchard, Jr., T. J., and McGee, M. G. (1977). Sex differences in human spatial ability: Not an X-linked recessive gene effect.Soc. Biol. 24:332–335.

  4. DeFries, J. C., and Kuse, A. R. (1978). Sex linkage: An alternative test.Behav. Genet. 8:543–544 (abstr.).

  5. DeFries, J. C., Johnson, R. C., Kuse, A. R., McClearn, G. E., Polovina, J., Vandenberg, S. G., and Wilson, J. R. (1979). Familial resemblance for specific cognitive abilities.Behav. Genet. 9:23–43.

  6. Loehlin, J., Sharan, S., and Jacoby, R. (1978). In pursuit of the “spatial gene”: A family study.Behav. Genet. 8:27–42.

  7. Maccoby, E. E., and Jacklin, C. N. (1974).The Psychology of Sex Differences, Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.

  8. Stafford, R. E. (1961). Sex differences in spatial visualization as evidence of sex-linked inheritance.Percept. Motor Skills 13:428.

  9. Stevens, M. E., and Hyde, J. S. (1978). A comment on Jensen's note on sex-linkage and race differences in spatial ability.Behav. Genet. 8:207–211.

  10. Vandenberg, S. G., and Kuse, A. R. (1978). Mental Rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization.Percept. Motor Skills 47:599–604.

  11. Vandenberg, S. G., and Kuse, A. R. (1979). Spatial ability: A critical review of the sex-linked major gene hypothesis. In Wittig, M. C., and Petersen, A. C. (eds.),Determinants of Sex-Related Differences in Cognitive Functioning, Academic Press, New York.

  12. Yen, W. M. (1975). Sex-linked major gene influences on selected types of spatial performance.Behav. Genet. 5:281–298.

Download references

Author information

Additional information

The results reported here are made possible by collaboration of a group of investigators (G. C. Ashton, R. C. Johnson, M. P. Mi, and M. N. Rashad at the University of Hawaii and J. C. DeFries, G. E. McClearn, S. G. Vandenberg, and J. R. Wilson at the University of Colorado) supported by NSF Grant GB-34720 and Grant HD-06669 from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. The senior author also acknowledges support by NIMH Grant MH-11167.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corley, R.P., DeFries, J.C., Kuse, A.R. et al. Familial resemblance for the Identical Blocks Test of spatial ability: No evidence for X linkage. Behav Genet 10, 211–215 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01066271

Download citation

Key Words

  • familial resemblance
  • spatial ability
  • sex difference
  • sex linkage