Advertisement

Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 5, Issue 1, pp 57–82 | Cite as

Criminal justice decision making as a stratification process: The role of race and stratification resources in pretrial release

  • Celesta A. Albonetti
  • Robert M. Hauser
  • John Hagan
  • Ilene H. Nagel
Article

Abstract

Our purpose is to bridge the criminal justice and stratification research literatures and to pursue the argument that homologous structural principles stratify allocation processes across central institutions of American society. The principle observed here in the making of bail decisions, as in earlier studies of the allocation of earnings, is that stratification resources operate to the greater advantage of whites than blacks. The operation of this principle is established through the estimation of covariance structure models of pretrial release decisions affecting 5660 defendants in 10 federal courts. Education and income are treated in this study as observed components of a composite construct, stratification resources, which works to the greater advantage of whites. Prior record is also found to operate to the greater advantage of whites. Two further variables, dangerousness and community ties, increase bail severity among blacks and whites. While the effect of community ties has been legally legitimized since the Bail Reform Act of 1966, the effect of dangerousness was not so legitimized until the Bail Reform Act of 1984. However, because our data precede the latter act, they confirm that this act simply reinstitutionalized earlier practice. Meanwhile, our race-specific findings may explain why although this and earlier studies find negligible main effects of race on criminal justice outcomes, black Americans nonetheless perceive more criminal injustice than do whites. In the criminal justice system, as in other spheres of American society, whites receive a better return on their resources, but our findings that the statutory severity of the offense and dangerousness work to the relative disadvantage of white defendants challenges conflict and labeling theory's one-dimensional characterization of black defendant disadvantage.

Key words

stratification resources race-specific effects discretion pretrial release decision covariance model 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, G. M., Glass, P., Roberts, J., and Schurz, A. (1958). A study of the administration of bail in New York City.Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 106: 685–690.Google Scholar
  2. Ares, C., Rankin, A., and Sturz, H. (1966). The Manhattan Bail Project: An interim report on the use of pretrial parole.N.Y.U. Law Rev. 38: 67–77.Google Scholar
  3. Balbus, I. (1977). Commodity form and legal form: An essay on the “relative autonomy” of the law.Law Soc. Rev. 11: 571–588.Google Scholar
  4. Beeley, A. (1927).The Bail System in Chicago, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (reprinted 1966).Google Scholar
  5. Bielby, W. T., Hauser, R. M., and Featherman, D. L. (1977). Response error of black and nonblack males in models of the intergenerational transmission of socioeconomic status.Am. J. Sociol. 82: 1242–1287.Google Scholar
  6. Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S., and Tonry, M. (1983).Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  7. Bohannon, P. (1965). The differing realms of the law. In Nader, L. (ed.),Ethnography of Law, Special Publication, pp. 33–42.Google Scholar
  8. Borman, P. (1971). The selling of preventive detention.Northwest. Law Rev. 65/66: 879–890.Google Scholar
  9. Bynum, T. (1977).An Empirical Exploration of the Factors Influencing Release on Recognizance, Ph.D dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.Google Scholar
  10. Clarke, S. H., Freeman, J. L., and Koch, G. C. (1976). Bail risk: A multivariate analysis.J. Legal Stud. 5: 341–385.Google Scholar
  11. Duncan, O. D. (1969). Inheritance of poverty or inheritance of wealth? In Moynihan, D. P. (ed.),Understanding Poverty, Basic, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Fabricant, M. (1969). Bail as a preferred freedom and the failures of New York's revision.Buffalo Law Rev. 18: 303–317.Google Scholar
  13. Farnworth, M., and Horan, P. (1980). Separate justice: An analysis of race differences in court processes.Soc. Sci. 9: 381–399.Google Scholar
  14. Featherman, D. L., and Hauser, R. M. (1978).Opportunity and Change, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Feeley, M., and McNaughton, J. (1974).The Pre-Trial Process in the Sixth Circuit: A Quantitative and Legal Analysis, New Haven Pre-Trial Services, New Haven, Conn.Google Scholar
  16. Foote, C. (1954). Compelling appearance in court: Administration of bail in Philadelphia.Univ. Pa. Law Rev. 102: 1031–1079.Google Scholar
  17. Foote, C. (1959). The bail system and equal justice.Fed. Probat. 23: 43–54.Google Scholar
  18. Freed, D., and Wald, P. (1964). Bail in the United States: 1964. National Conference on Bail and Criminal, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  19. Goldkamp, J. S. (1977).Bail Decisionmaking and the Role of Pretrial Decisionmaking in American Justice, Ph.D. dissertation, School of Criminal Justice, State University of New York at Albany, Albany.Google Scholar
  20. Goldkamp, J. S. (1979).Two Classes of Accused: A Study of Bail and Detention in American Justice, Ballinger, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  21. Goldkamp, J. S. (1983). Questioning the practice of pretrial detention: Some empirical evidence from Philadelphia.J. Crim. Law Criminal. 74: 1556–1588.Google Scholar
  22. Goldkamp, J. S. (1985). Danger and detention: A second generation of bail reform.J. Crim. Law Criminal. 76: 1–74.Google Scholar
  23. Goldkamp, J. S. (1987). Prediction in criminal justice policy development. In Gottfredson, D. M., and Tonry, M. (eds.),Classification and Prediction in Criminal Justice Decision. 9 Crime and Justice, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  24. Goldkamp, J. S., Gottfredson, M. R., and Mitchel-Herzfeld, S. (1981).Bail Decision Making: A Study of Policy Guidelines, National Institute of Corrections, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  25. Goldkamp, J. S., and Gottfredson, M. R. (1985).Policy Guidelines for Bail: An Experiment in Court Reform, Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  26. Gottfredson, D. C. (1981). Black-white differences in the educational attainment process: What have we learned?Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 542–557.Google Scholar
  27. Hagan, J., and Albonetti, C. (1982). Race, class and the perception of criminal injustice in America.Am. J. Sociol. 88: 329–355.Google Scholar
  28. Hagan, J. and Bumiller, K. (1983). A review and critique of sentencing research. In Blumstein, A., Cohen, J., Martin, S., and Tontry, M. (eds.),Research on Sentencing: The Search for Reform, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  29. Hagan, J., and Parker, P. (1985). White collar crime and punishment: The class structure and legal sanctioning of securities violations.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 302–316.Google Scholar
  30. Hagan, J., Nagel, I., and Albonetti, C. A., (1980). The differential sentencing of white collar offenders in ten federal district courts.Am. Sociol. Rev. 45: 802–820.Google Scholar
  31. Hess, F. (1971). Pre-trial detention and the 1970 D.C. Crime Act-The next step in bail reform.Brooklyn Law Rev. 37: 277–322.Google Scholar
  32. Hout, M. (1984). Occupational mobility of black men: 1962 to 1973.Am. Sociol. Rev. 49: 308–322.Google Scholar
  33. Humphries, D. and Greenberg, D. (1984). Social control and social formation: A Marxian analysis. In Black, D. (ed.),Toward a General Theory of Social Control, Vol. II. Selected Problems, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Jöreskog, K. (1973). A general method for estimating a linear structural equation system. In Goldberger, A., and Duncan, O. (eds.),Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences, Seminar Press, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Jöreskog, K., and Sörbom, D. (1981a)LISREL—Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. User's Guide, Version V, National Educational Resources, Chicago.Google Scholar
  36. Jöreskog, K., and Sörbom, D. (1982b). The use of LISREL in sociological model building. In Jackson, D. J., and Borgatta, E. F. (eds.),Factor Analysis and Measurement in Sociological Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, Calif.Google Scholar
  37. Landes, W. (1973). the bail system: An economic approach.J. Legal Stud. 2: 79–91.Google Scholar
  38. Landes, W. (1974). Legality and reality: Some evidence on criminal proceeding.J. Legal Stud. 3: 105–123.Google Scholar
  39. Lizotte, A. (1978). Extra-legal factors in Chicago's criminal courts: Testing the conflict model of criminal justice.Soc. Problems 25: 564–580.Google Scholar
  40. Kleck, G. (1981). Racial discrimination in criminal sentencing: A critical examination of the evidence with additional evidence on the death penalty.Am. Sociol Rev. 46: 783–805.Google Scholar
  41. Miethe, T. D., and Moore, C. A. (1986). Racial differences in criminal processing: The consequences of model selection on conclusions about differential treatment.Sociol. Q. 27: 217–237.Google Scholar
  42. Mitchell, J. (1969). Bail reform and the constitutionality of pre-trial detention.Va. Law Rev. 55: 1223–1242.Google Scholar
  43. Morse, W., and Beattie, R. (1932).Survey of the Administration of Criminal Justice in Oregon, University of Oregon, Eugene.Google Scholar
  44. Nagel, I. (1983). The legal/extra-legal controversy: Judicial decisions on pretrial release.Law Soc. Rev. 17: 481–515.Google Scholar
  45. Rossi, P., Wake, E., Bose, C., and Berk, R. (1974). The seriousness of crime: Normative structure and individual differences.Am. Sociol. Rev. 39: 224–237.Google Scholar
  46. Siegel, P. (1965). On the costs of being a negro.Sociol. Inquiry 35: 41–57.Google Scholar
  47. Stryker, R., Nagel, I. H., and Hagan, J. (1983). Methodological issues in court research.Sociol. Methods Res. 11: 469–500.Google Scholar
  48. Thomas, W. H. (1976).The Bail Reform in America, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  49. Tribe, L. (1970). An ounce of detention: Preventive justice in the works of John Mitchell.Va. Law Rev. 56: 371–389.Google Scholar
  50. Weiss, R. (1970). The effect of education on the earnings of blacks and whites.Rev. Econ. Stat. 52: 150–159.Google Scholar
  51. Wheeler, S., Weisbord, D., and Bode, N. (1982). Sentencing the white collar offender: Rhetoric and reality.Am. Sociol. Rev. 47: 641–659.Google Scholar
  52. Wice, P. (1974).Freedom for Sale, Lexington Books, Lexington, Ky.Google Scholar
  53. Williams, R., and Thomson, E. (1983). Notes on the estimation of models with wife-husband data. Center of Demography and Ecology Working Paper 82-58, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  54. Wilson, W. J. (1978).The Declining Significance of Race, University of Chicago, Chicago.Google Scholar
  55. Wright, E. O. (1978). Race, class and income inequality,Am. J. Sociol. 83: 1368–1397.Google Scholar
  56. Yankerovich, Skelly, and White, Inc. (1977). The public image of the courts: A national survey of the general public, judges, lawyers, and community leaders. Unpublished report, National Criminal Justice Reference Service, Rockville, Maryland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • Celesta A. Albonetti
    • 1
  • Robert M. Hauser
    • 2
  • John Hagan
    • 3
  • Ilene H. Nagel
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Criminal JusticeTemple University Philadelphia
  2. 2.Department of Sociology and Center of Demography and EcologyUniversity of Wisconsin-MadisonMadison
  3. 3.Canadian Institute of Advanced Research-Statistics CanadaUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Law SchoolIndiana UniversityBloomington

Personalised recommendations