Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 15, Issue 5, pp 467–473 | Cite as

Multiple regression analysis of twin data

  • J. C. DeFries
  • D. W. Fulker
Article

Abstract

A multiple regression model for the analysis of twin data is described in which a cotwin's score is predicted from a proband's score and the coefficient of relationship (R=1.0 and 0.5 for identical and fraternal twin pairs, respectively). This model is especially appropriate for the analysis of data on twins in which one member of each pair has been selected because of a deviant score, e.g., low reading performance. When the model is fitted to such data, the partial regression of the cotwin's score on the coefficient of relationship provides a powerful test of the extent to which the difference between the mean for probands and that for the unselected population is heritable, i.e., a test for genetic etiology. By fitting an augmented model containing an interaction term to either selected or unselected data sets, direct estimates of heritability and the proportion of variance due to shared environmental influences can also be obtained (subject, of course, to the usual assumptions underlying twin analyses, e.g., a linear polygenic model, little or no assortative mating, and equal shared environmental influences for identical and fraternal twins).

Key Words

heritability multiple regression reading disability twins 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cohen, J., and Cohen, P. (1975).Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, N.J.Google Scholar
  2. Decker, S. N., and Vandenberg, S. G. (1985). Colorado Twin Study of Reading Disability. In Gray, D., and Kavanagh, J. (eds.),Biobehavioral Measures of Dyslexia, York Press, Parkton, Md. (in press).Google Scholar
  3. DeFries, J. C. (1985). Colorado Reading Project. In Gray, D., and Kavanagh, J. (eds.),Biobehavioral Measures of Dyslexia, York Press, Parkton, Md. (in press).Google Scholar
  4. Dunn, L. M., and Markwardt, F. C. (1970).Examiner's Manual: Peabody Individual Achievement Test, American Guidance Service, Circle Pines, Minn.Google Scholar
  5. Fulker, D. W. (1981). The genetic and environmental architecture of psychoticism, extraversion, and neuroticism. In Eysenck, H. J. (ed.),A Model for Personality, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Ho, H.-Z., Foch, T. T., and Plomin, R. (1980). Developmental stability of the relative influence of genes and environment on specific cognitive abilities during childhood.Dev. Psychol. 16:340–346.Google Scholar
  7. Morton, N. E. (1982).Outline of Genetic Epidemiology, Karger, New York.Google Scholar
  8. Rose, R. J., and Ditto, W. B. (1983). A developmental-genetic analysis of common fears from early adolescence to early adulthood.Child Dev. 54:361–368.Google Scholar
  9. Wilkinson, L. (1984).SYSTAT: The System for Statistics. SYSTAT, Evanston, IllGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. C. DeFries
    • 1
  • D. W. Fulker
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Behavioral GeneticsUniversity of ColoradoBoulder

Personalised recommendations