Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 15, Issue 3, pp 297–303 | Cite as

The aging effect on male mating activity inDrosophila melanogaster

  • Kazuhiko Kosuda
Article

Abstract

Noncompetitive mating activity for young (3-day) and old (28-day) Drosophila melanogaster males was measured under chromosomally homozygous and heterozygous conditions. Old males were consistently less active than young ones under both conditions. Three of 29 homozygous lines exhibited sterility due to aging. Virility at the old age did not correlate with that at the young age. Differences among homozygous lines were highly significant for old and young males, indicating a genetic basis for the trait. Individual variation in “old” virility was shown to be much higher than that in young males.

Key Words

mating activity aging selection Drosophila melanogaster 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aigaki, T., and Ohba, S. (1984). Individual analysis of age-associated changes in reproductive activity and lifespan ofDrosophila virilis.Exp. Gerontol. 19:13–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, W. W. (1969). Selection in experimental populations. I. Lethal genes.Genetics 62:653–672.Google Scholar
  3. Brittnacher, J. G. (1981). Genetic variation and genetic load due to the male reproductive component of fitness inDrosophila.Genetics 97:719–730.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bundgaard, J., and Christiansen, F. B. (1972). Dynamics of polymorphism. I. Selection components in an experimental population ofDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 71:439–460.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Clarke, J. M., and Maynard-Smith, J. (1955). The genetics and cytology ofDrosophila subobscura. XI. Hybrid vigor and longevity.J. Genet. 53:172–192.Google Scholar
  6. Duncan, F. N. (1930). Some observations on the biology of the maleDrosophila melanogaster.Am. Nat. 64:545–551.Google Scholar
  7. Kosuda, K. (1983). Genetic variability in mating activity ofDrosophila melanogaster males.Experientia 39:100–101.Google Scholar
  8. Mossige, J. C. (1955). Sperm utilization and brood patterns inDrosophila melanogaster.Am. Nat. 89:123–127.Google Scholar
  9. Pearl, R., Parker, S. L., and Gonzalez, B. M. (1923). Experimental studies on the duration of life in crosses of wild type and quintuple stocks ofDrosophila melanogaster.Am. Nat. 57:153–192.Google Scholar
  10. Petit, C., Bourgeron, P., and Mercot, H. (1980). Multiple matings, effective population size and sexual selection inDrosophila melanogaster.Heredity 45:281–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Prout, T. (1971a). The relation between fitness components and population prediction inDrosophila. I. The estimation of fitness components.Genetics 68:127–149.Google Scholar
  12. Prout, T. (1971b). The relation between fitness components and population prediction inDrosophila. II. Population prediction.Genetics 68:151–167.Google Scholar
  13. Sharp, P. M. (1982). Competitive mating inDrosophila melanogaster.Genet. Res. 40:201–205.Google Scholar
  14. Smith, J. R. (1978). The genetics of aging in lower organisms. In Schneider, E. L. (ed.),The Genetics of Aging, Plenum Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Sved, J. A. (1971). An estimation of heterosis inDrosophila melanogaster.Genet. Res. 18:97–105.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sved, J. A., and Ayala, F. J. (1970). A population cage test for heterosis inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 66:87–113.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1985

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuhiko Kosuda
    • 1
  1. 1.Biological Laboratory, Faculty of ScienceJosai UniversitySakado, SaitamaJapan

Personalised recommendations