Journal of Insect Behavior

, Volume 2, Issue 5, pp 719–725 | Cite as

The blind leading the blind: Modeling chemically mediated army ant raid patterns

  • J. L. Deneubourg
  • S. Goss
  • N. Franks
  • J. M. Pasteels
Short Communication

Key words

army ants raid patterns self-organization mathematical model 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bernstein, R. A. (1975). Foraging strategies of ants in response to variable food density (Hym. Formicidae).Ecology 56: 213–219.Google Scholar
  2. Burton, J. L., and Franks, N. R. (1985). The foraging ecology of the army antEciton rapax: An ergonomie enigma?Ecol. Entomol. 10: 131–141.Google Scholar
  3. Chadab, R., and Rettenmeyer, C. W. (1975). Mass recruitment by army ants.Science 188: 1124–1125.Google Scholar
  4. Deneubourg, J. L. (1979).Essai de Modélisation en Sociobiologie et Sociologie, Ph.D. thesis, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Bruxelles. Deneubourg, J. L., Aron, S., goss, S., and Pasteeis, J. M. (1989). The self-organizing exploratory pattern of the Argentine ant.J. Insect Behav. (in press).Google Scholar
  5. Fitzgerald, T. D., and Peterson, S. C. (1988). Cooperative foraging and communication in caterpillars.Bioscience 38: 20–25.Google Scholar
  6. Franks, N. R. (1985). Reproduction, foraging efficiency and worker polymorphism in army ants. In Hölldobler, B., and Lindauer, M. (eds.),Experimental Behavioral Ecology: Fortschritte der Zool. BD 31, Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 91–107.Google Scholar
  7. Franks, N. R., and Bossert, W. H. (1983). The influence of swarm raiding army ants on the patchiness and diversity of a tropical leaf litter ant community. In Sutton, S. L., Chadwick, A. C., and Whitmore, T. C. (eds.),Tropical Rain Forest: Ecology and Management, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 151–163.Google Scholar
  8. Franks, N. R., and Fletcher, C. R. (1983). Spatial patterns in army ant foraging and migration:Eciton burchelli on Barro Colorado Island, Panama.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 12: 261–270.Google Scholar
  9. Goss, S., and Deneubourg, J. L. (1989). The self-organizing clock-pattern ofMessor pergandei (Formicidae, Myrmicinae).Insect Soc. (in press).Google Scholar
  10. Gotwald, W. H., Jr. (1982). Army ants. In Hermann, H. R. (ed.),Social Insects, Academic Press, New York, pp. 157–254.Google Scholar
  11. Hahn, M., and Maschwitz, U. (1985). Foraging strategies and recruitment behaviour in the European harvester antMessor rufitarsis (F.).Oecologia 68: 45–51.Google Scholar
  12. Hölldobler, B., and Lumsden, C. J. (1980). Territorial strategies in ants.Science 210: 732–739.Google Scholar
  13. Hölldobler, B., Engel, H., and Taylor, R. E. (1982). A new sternal gland in ants and its function in chemical communication.Naturwissenschaften 69: 90–91.Google Scholar
  14. Leuthold, R. H., Bruinsma, O., and van Huis, A. (1976). Optical and pheromonal orientation and memory for homing distance in the harvester termiteHodotermes mossambicus (Hagen) (Isopt., Homotermitidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 1: 127–139.Google Scholar
  15. Maschwitz, U., and Mühlenberg, M. (1975). Zur Jagdstrategie einiger orientalischer Leptogenys-Arten (Formicidae: Ponerinae).Oecologia 38: 65–83.Google Scholar
  16. Moffet, M. W. (1984). Swarm raiding in a myrmicine ant.Naturwissenschaften 71: 588–590.Google Scholar
  17. Moffet, M. W. (1988). Foraging dynamics in the group-hunting myrmicine ant,Pheidologeton diversus. J. Insect Behav.71: 588–590.Google Scholar
  18. Oloo, G. W., and Leuthold, R. H. (1979). The influence of food on the trail-laying and recruitment behaviour in Trinervitermes bettonianus (Termitidae: Nasutitermitinae).Entomol. Exp. Appl. 26: 267–278.Google Scholar
  19. Pasteels, J. M. (1965). Polyéthisme chez les ouvrières deNasutitermes lujae (Termitidae Isoptères).Biol. Gabon. 1: 191–205.Google Scholar
  20. Pasteels, J. M., Deneubourg, J. L., and Goss, S. (1987). Self-organization mechanisms in ant societies (I): Trail recruitment to newly discovered food sources. In Pasteels, J. M., and Deneubourg, J. L. (eds.),From Individual To Collective Behavior In Social Insects, Birkhäuser, Basel, pp. 155–176.Google Scholar
  21. Raignier, A., and Van Boven, J. K. A. (1955). Etude taxonomique, biologique et biométrique des Dorylus du sous-genreAnomma (Hymenoptera: Formicidae).J. Ann. Mus. Roy. Congo Belge n.s. 4 Sci. Zool. 2: 1–359.Google Scholar
  22. Rettenmeyer, C. W. (1963). Behavioral studies of army ants.Univ. Kans. Sci. Bull. 44: 281–465.Google Scholar
  23. Schneirla, T. C. (1933). Studies on army ants in Panama.J. Comp. Psychol. 15: 267–299.Google Scholar
  24. Schneirla, T. C. (1940). Further studies on the army ant behavior pattern.J. Comp. Psychol. 29: 401–461.Google Scholar
  25. Schneirla, T. C. (1971). In Topoff, H. R. (ed.),Army Ants: A Study in Social Organization, Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  26. Stuart, A. M. (1969). Social behavior and communication. In Krishna, K., and Weesner, F. M. (eds.),Biology of Termites, Academic Press, New York, pp. 193–232.Google Scholar
  27. Topoff, H. R. (1972). The social behavior of army ants. In Eisner, T., and Wilson, E. O. (eds.),The Insects, Scientific American, Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 247–262.Google Scholar
  28. Topoff, H. R., Mirenda, J., Droual, R., and Herrick, S. (1980). Behavioural ecology of mass recruitment in the army antNeivamyrmex nigrescens.Anim. Behav. 28: 779–789.Google Scholar
  29. Wilson, E. O. (1958). The beginnings of nomadic and group-predatory behavior in the ponerine ants.Evolution 12: 24–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1989

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. L. Deneubourg
    • 1
  • S. Goss
    • 1
  • N. Franks
    • 2
  • J. M. Pasteels
    • 1
  1. 1.Unit of Behavioural Ecology, C.P. 231Université Libre de BruxellesBruxellesBelgium
  2. 2.School of Biological SciencesBath UniversityClaverton DownUK

Personalised recommendations