Advertisement

Behavior Genetics

, Volume 18, Issue 4, pp 439–448 | Cite as

The ontogeny of kin discrimination cues in the honey bee,Apis mellifera

  • Michael D. Breed
  • Tammy M. Stiller
  • Mary Jo Moor
Articles

Abstract

Cues used in the discrimination of relatives from nonrelatives by the honey bee reflect both genetic and environmental differences between groups. Discrimination is behaviorally expressed by acceptance into or agonistic rejection from the social group. We examine the development of these cues in field colonies and in controlled laboratory settings. Newly emerged worker honey bees are accepted by honey bee social groups at a high frequency. When bees are kept in a controlled laboratory environment for 5 days, acceptability into laboratory groups is determined largely by relatedness. Cues indicating relatedness develop in the laboratory within 12 h after the adult bee emerges. Bees older than 12 h are not accepted by field colonies regardless of relatedness. Bees maintained in a hive until 5 days after emergence are not accepted by related or unrelated laboratory groups (this is termed the “hive effect”). Bees maintained in hives for times as short as 5 h acquired the hive effect. In a cross-fostering experiment, the hive effect completely masked genetic differences.

Key Words

honey bee Apis mellifera kin recognition ontogeny discrimination cues hive effect 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bell, W. J., Breed, M. D., Richards, K. W., and Michener, C. D. (1975). Social, stimulatory, and motivational factors involved in intraspecific nest defense of a primitively eusocial halictine bee.J. Comp. Physiol. 93:173–181.Google Scholar
  2. Breed, M. D. (1981). Individual recognition and learning of queen odors by worker honey bees.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:2635–2637.Google Scholar
  3. Breed, M. D. (1983). Nestmate recognition in honey bees.Anim. Behav. 31:86–91.Google Scholar
  4. Breed, M. D. (1987). Multiple inputs in the nestmate discrimination system of the honey bee. In Eder, J., and Rembold, H. (eds.),The Biology and Chemistry of Social Insects, Verlag J. Peperny, Munich, pp. 461–462.Google Scholar
  5. Breed, M. D., and Bennett, B. (1987). Kin recognition in highly eusocial insects. In Fletcher, D. J. C., and Michener, C. D. (eds.),Kin Recognition in Animals, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, pp. 243–285.Google Scholar
  6. Breed, M. D., Butler, L., and Stiller, T. M. (1985). Learning and genetic influences in the discrimination of colony members by social Hymenoptera.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:3058–3061.Google Scholar
  7. Frumhoff, P. C., and Schneider, S. (1987). The social consequences of honey bee polyandry: The effects of kinship on worker interactions within colonies.Anim. Behav. 35:255–262.Google Scholar
  8. Gamboa, G. J., Reeve, H. K., and Pfennig, D. W. (1986). The evolution and ontogeny of nestmate recognition in social wasps.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 31:431–435.Google Scholar
  9. Getz, W. M., and Smith, K. B. (1983). Genetic kin recognition: Honey bees discriminate between full- and half-sisters.Nature 302:147–148.Google Scholar
  10. Getz, W. M., and Smith, K. B. (1986). Honey bee kin recognition: Learning self and nestmate phenotypes.Anim. Behav. 34:1617–1626.Google Scholar
  11. Getz, W. M., Bruckner, D., and Parisian, T. R. (1982). Kin structure and swarming behavior of the honey bee,Apis mellifera.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 10:265–270.Google Scholar
  12. Isigrini, M., Lenoir, A., and Jaisson, P. (1985). Preimaginal learning as a basis of colony-brood recognition in the ant,Cataglyphis cursor.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:8545–8547.Google Scholar
  13. Kalmus, H., and Ribbands, C. R. (1952). The origin of odors by which honey bees distinguish their companions.Proc. Roy. Soc. B 140:50–59.Google Scholar
  14. Noonan, K. C. (1986). Recognition of queen larvae by worker honey bees.Ethology 73:295–306.Google Scholar
  15. Wilson, E. O. (1971).The Insect Societies, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. Breed
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tammy M. Stiller
    • 1
  • Mary Jo Moor
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Environmental, Population, and Organismic BiologyThe University of ColoradoBoulder
  2. 2.Institute for Behavioral GeneticsThe University of ColoradoBoulder

Personalised recommendations