Effects of mercury, selenium, and organochlorine contaminants on reproduction of Forster's terns and black skimmers nesting in a contaminated Texas Bay

  • Kirke A. King
  • Thomas W. Custer
  • James S. Quinn
Article

Abstract

Mean mercury (0.40 μg/g), and geometric mean DDE (1.6 μg/g) and polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) (2.3 μg/g) concentrations in Forster's tern (Sterna forsteri) eggs from Lavaca Bay were higher than those in tern eggs from a reference area in San Antonio Bay, but residues were not correlated with hatching success. Nest success was similar between bays. Selenium levels in Lavaca Bay tern eggs (0.71 μg/g) were also comparable to those in eggs from the reference area (0.68 μg/g).

Clutch size (3.1 to 3.4) of Lavaca Bay black skimmers (Rynchops niger) was no different than that (3.4) at a reference colony near Laguna Vista. Nest success was similar among three Lavaca Bay colonies, but success was lower at one Lavaca Bay colony (40%) than at Laguna Vista (65%). Mean mercury (0.46 μg/g) and selenium (0.75 μg/g) concentrations in skimmer eggs from Lavaca Bay were higher than those (0.19, 0.33 μg/g) from Laguna Vista; however, concentrations of neither contaminant were related to hatching success. DDE concentrations in Lavaca Bay skimmer eggs (3.4 μg/g) were similar to those from Laguna Vista (3.2 μg/g) and DDE was negatively correlated with hatching success. PCBs were higher in eggs from Lavaca Bay (1.3 μg/g) than Laguna Vista (0.8 μg/g). Organochlorine and metal contaminants in most eggs were below embryotoxic levels. Eggshell thinning in Forster's terns (7%) and black skimmers (5%) was below that associated with lowered reproduction.

DDE and PCBs were detected in 9 Caspian tern (S. caspia) eggs; maximum concentrations were 4.7 and 5.4 μg/g. Caspian tern and least tern (S. albifrons) eggs contained low (⩽0.9 μg/g) concentrations of mercury and selenium.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson DW, Hickey JJ, Risebrough RW, Hughes DF, Christensen RE (1969) Significance of chlorinated hydrocarbon residues to breeding pelicans and cormornats. Can Field-Nat 83:91–112Google Scholar
  2. Bent AC (1921) Life Histories of North American Gulls and Terns. US Nat Museum Bull 113. Washington DC, 345 ppGoogle Scholar
  3. Blus LJ (1970) Measurements of brown pelican eggshells from Florida and South Carolina. BioScience 20:867–869Google Scholar
  4. — (1982) Further interpretation of the relation of organochlorine residues in brown pelican eggs to reproductive success. Environ Pollut 28:15–23Google Scholar
  5. Blus LJ, Neely BS, Lamont TG, Mulhern B (1977) Residues of organochlorines and heavy metals in tissues and eggs of brown pelicans, 1969–73. Pestic Monit J 11:40–53PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Blus LJ, Neely Jr BS, Belisle AA, Prouty RM (1974) Organochlorine residues in brown pelican eggs: relation to reproductive success. Environ Pollut 7:81–91Google Scholar
  7. Connors PG, Anderlini VC, Risebrough RW, Gilbertson M, Hays H (1975) Investigations of heavy metals in common tern populations. Can Field-Nat 89:157–162Google Scholar
  8. Custer TW, Heinz GH (1980) Reproductive success and nest attentiveness of mallard ducks fed Aroclor 1254®. Environ Pollut 21:313–318Google Scholar
  9. Custer TW, Hensler GL, Kaiser TE (1983) Clutch size, reproductive success, and organochlorine contaminants in Atlantic Coast black-crowned night-herons. Auk 100:699–710Google Scholar
  10. Custer TW, Mitchell CA (1987) Organochlorine contaminants and reproductive success of black skimmers in south Texas, 1984. J Field Ornithol 58:480–489Google Scholar
  11. DePue J (1974) Nesting and reproduction in the black skimmer (Rynchops niger) on four spoil islands in the Laguna Madre, Texas. MS Thesis, Texas A&I Univ, KingsvilleGoogle Scholar
  12. Faber RA, Hickey JJ (1973) Eggshell thinning, chlorinated hydrocarbons, and mercury in inland aquatic bird eggs, 1969 and 1970. Pestic Monit J 7:27–36PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Fimreite N (1971) Effects of dietary methylmercury on ring-necked pheasants. Occas Pap Can Wildl Serv 9:1–37Google Scholar
  14. — (1974) Mercury contamination of aquatic birds in north-western Ontario. J Wildl Manage 38:120–131Google Scholar
  15. Fimreite N, Holsworth WM, Keith JA, Pearch PA, Gruchy IM (1971) Mercury in fish and fish-eating birds near sites of industrial contamination in Canada. Can Field-Nat 84:211–220Google Scholar
  16. Finley MT, Stendell RC (1978) Survival and reproductive success of black ducks fed mercury. Environ Pollut 16:51–64Google Scholar
  17. Heinz G (1975) Effects of methylmercury on approach and avoidance behavior of mallard ducklings. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 13:554–564PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. — (1980) Eggshell thickness in birds fed methylmercury. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 25:498–502PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Heinz G, Locke LN (1976) Brain lesions in mallard ducklings from parents fed methylmercury. Avian Dis 20:9–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Hensler G, Nichols JD (1981) The Mayfield method for estimating nesting success: A model, estimators and simulation results. Wilson Bull 93:42–53Google Scholar
  21. King KA, Blankinship DR, Payne E, Krynitsky AJ, Hensler GL (1985) Brown pelican populations and pollutants in Texas 1975–1981. Wilson Bull 97:201–214Google Scholar
  22. King KA, Flickinger EL, Hildebrand HH (1978) Shell thinning and pesticide residues in Texas aquatic bird eggs. Pestic Monit J 12:16–21PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. King KA, Krynitsky AJ (1986) Population trends, reproductive success, and organochlorine chemical contaminants in waterbirds nesting in Galveston Bay, Texas. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 15:367–376PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. King KA, LaFever CA, Mulhern BM (1983) Organochlorine and metal residues in royal terns nesting on the central Texas coast. J Field Ornithol 54:295–303Google Scholar
  25. King KA, Meeker DL, Swineford DM (1980) White-faced Ibis populations and pollutants in Texas, 1969–1976. Southwest Nat 25:225–240Google Scholar
  26. Krynitsky A, (1987) Preparation of biological tissue for determination of arsenic and selenium by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal Chem 59:1884–1886PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Kubiak TJ, Harris HJ, Smith LM, Schwartz TR, Stalling DL, Trick JA, Sileo L, Docherty DE, Erdman TC (1989) Microcontaminants and reproductive impairment of the Forster's tern on Green Bay, Lake Michigan-1983. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 18:706–727PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. May TW, McKinney GL (1981) Cadmium, lead, mercury, arsenic, and selenium concentrations in freshwater fish 1976–77-National Pesticide Monitoring Program. Pestic Monit J 15:14–38PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Mayfield HF (1961) Nesting success calculated from exposure. Wilson Bull 73:255–261Google Scholar
  30. — (1975) Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bull 87:456–466Google Scholar
  31. Moore JW, Sutherland DJ (1980) Mercury concentrations in fish inhabiting two polluted lakes in Northern Canada. Water Res 14:903–907Google Scholar
  32. Neter J, Wasserman W (1974) Applied linear models. Richard D Irwin Inc, Homewood ILGoogle Scholar
  33. Oberholser HC (1974) The birdlife of Texas. Vol. 1. Univ Texas Press, Austin TXGoogle Scholar
  34. Ohlendorf HM, Custer TW, Lowe RW, Rigney M, Cromartie E (1988) Organochlorines and mercury in eggs of coastal terns and herons in California, USA. Colonial Waterbirds 11:85–94Google Scholar
  35. Ohlendorf HM, Hothem RL, Bunck CM, Aldrich TW, Moore JF (1986) Relationships between selenium concentrations and avian reproduction. In: Trans 51st N Amer Wildl & Nat Res Conf 51:330–342Google Scholar
  36. Sims RR Jr, Presley BJ (1976) Heavy metal concentrations in organisms from an actively dredged Texas bay. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 16:520–527PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Spann JW, Heath RG, Kreitzer JF, Locke LN (1972) Ethyl mercuryp-toluenesulfonanilide: Lethal and reproductive effects on pheasants. Science 175:328–331PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Speyer MR (1980) Mercury and selenium concentrations in fish, sediments, and water of two northwestern Quebec lakes. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 24:427–432Google Scholar
  39. Stickel LF (1973) Pesticide residues in birds and mammals. In: Edwards CA (ed) Environmental pollution by pesticides. Plenum Press, New York, pp 254–312Google Scholar
  40. Stickel LF, Wiemeyer SN, Blus LJ (1973) Pesticide residues in eggs of wild birds: adjustments for loss of moisture and lipid. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 9:193–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Texas Colonial Waterbird Society (1982) An atlas and census of Texas waterbird colonies. Caesar Kleberg Wildlife Research Institute, Kingsville, TXGoogle Scholar
  42. Texas Department of Health, Division of Shellfish Sanitation and Control (1982) Mercury concentrations in marine organisms of Lavaca Bay. Unpub rept 112 ppGoogle Scholar
  43. Vermeer K (1971) A survey of mercury residues in aquatic bird eggs in the Canadian prairie provinces. Trans N Am Wildl Nat Resour Conf 36:138–152Google Scholar
  44. — (1973) Comparison of food habits and mercury residues of Caspian and common terns. Canadian-Field Nat. 87:305Google Scholar
  45. Vermeer K, Armstrong FAJ, Hatch DRM (1973) Mercury in aquatic birds at Clay Lake, Western Ontario. J Wildl Manage 37:58–61Google Scholar
  46. White DH, King KA, Prouty RM (1980) Significance of organochlorine and heavy metal residues in wintering shorebirds at Corpus Christi, Texas, 1976–77. Pestic Monit J 14:58–63PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. White DH, Mitchell CA, Swineford DM (1984) Reproductive success of black skimmers in Texas relative to environmental pollutants. J Field Ornithol 55:18–30Google Scholar
  48. Windom HL (1972) Arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, mercury, and zinc in marine biota-North Atlantic Ocean. In: Baseline studies of pollutants in the marine environment, (I.D.O.E.) Nat Sci Found. Upton, Long Island, NY, pp 121–148Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 1991

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kirke A. King
    • 1
  • Thomas W. Custer
    • 1
  • James S. Quinn
    • 2
  1. 1.U.S. Fish & Wildlife ServicePatuxent Wildlife Research CenterLaurelUSA
  2. 2.Department of BiologyQueen's UniversityKingstonCanada

Personalised recommendations