Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

When is a picture?

Abstract

Philosophical discussions of depiction sometimes suffer from a lack of differentiation between several questions concerning the ‘nature’ of pictorial representation. To provide a suitable framework I distinguish six such questions and several levels on which one might want to proceed in order to answer some of them. With this background, I reconstruct Goodman's and Elgin's answer to the specific question: ‘What distinguishes the pictorial from the verbal or linguistic?’ I try to reveal some major motivations behind their system-oriented approach and to indicate some reasons why a strategy of this kind is to a certain extent mandatory to grasp the ‘nature of the pictorial’. The system-relative and functional character of depiction has to be captured by every adequate theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Black, M.: 1972, ‘How Do Pictures Represent?’, in E. H. Gombrich, J. Hochberg, and M. Black (eds.),Art, Perception and Reality, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 95–129.

  2. Candlish, S.: 1982, ‘What Makes my Image of Him into an Image of Him?’, in W. Leinfellner et al. (eds.),Languages and Ontology (Proceedings of the Sixth International Wittgenstein Symposium), Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Wien, pp. 222–26.

  3. Elgin, C. Z.: 1983,With Reference to Reference, Hackett, Indianapolis.

  4. Goodman, N.: 1968,Languages of Art, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.

  5. Goodman, N.: 1972,Problems and Projects, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.

  6. Goodman, N.: 1978,Ways of Worldmaking, Harvester Press, Hassocks.

  7. Goodman, N.: 1984,Of Mind and Other Matters, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

  8. Goodman, N. and C. Z. Elgin: 1988,Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences, Harvester Press, Hassocks.

  9. Scholz, O. R.: 1991,Bild, Darstellung, Zeichen. Philosophische Theorien bildhafter Darstellung, Karl Alber, Freiburg/München.

  10. Schwartz, R.: 1975, ‘Representation and Resemblance’,The Philosophical Forum 7, 499–512.

  11. Schwartz, R.: 1980, ‘Imagery’,Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2, 285–301.

  12. Schwartz, R.: 1985, ‘The Power of Pictures’,The Journal of Philosophy 82, 711–20.

  13. Squires, R.: 1969, ‘Depicting’,Philosophy 44, 193–204.

  14. Walton, K. L.: 1974, ‘Are Representations Symbols?’,The Monist 58, 236–54.

Download references

Author information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Scholz, O.R. When is a picture?. Synthese 95, 95–106 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064669

Download citation

Keywords

  • Specific Question
  • Adequate Theory
  • Pictorial Representation
  • Philosophical Discussion
  • Major Motivation