Philosophical discussions of depiction sometimes suffer from a lack of differentiation between several questions concerning the ‘nature’ of pictorial representation. To provide a suitable framework I distinguish six such questions and several levels on which one might want to proceed in order to answer some of them. With this background, I reconstruct Goodman's and Elgin's answer to the specific question: ‘What distinguishes the pictorial from the verbal or linguistic?’ I try to reveal some major motivations behind their system-oriented approach and to indicate some reasons why a strategy of this kind is to a certain extent mandatory to grasp the ‘nature of the pictorial’. The system-relative and functional character of depiction has to be captured by every adequate theory.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price includes VAT for USA
Subscribe to journal
Immediate online access to all issues from 2019. Subscription will auto renew annually.
This is the net price. Taxes to be calculated in checkout.
Black, M.: 1972, ‘How Do Pictures Represent?’, in E. H. Gombrich, J. Hochberg, and M. Black (eds.),Art, Perception and Reality, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 95–129.
Candlish, S.: 1982, ‘What Makes my Image of Him into an Image of Him?’, in W. Leinfellner et al. (eds.),Languages and Ontology (Proceedings of the Sixth International Wittgenstein Symposium), Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Wien, pp. 222–26.
Elgin, C. Z.: 1983,With Reference to Reference, Hackett, Indianapolis.
Goodman, N.: 1968,Languages of Art, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.
Goodman, N.: 1972,Problems and Projects, Bobbs-Merrill, Indianapolis.
Goodman, N.: 1978,Ways of Worldmaking, Harvester Press, Hassocks.
Goodman, N.: 1984,Of Mind and Other Matters, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Goodman, N. and C. Z. Elgin: 1988,Reconceptions in Philosophy and Other Arts and Sciences, Harvester Press, Hassocks.
Scholz, O. R.: 1991,Bild, Darstellung, Zeichen. Philosophische Theorien bildhafter Darstellung, Karl Alber, Freiburg/München.
Schwartz, R.: 1975, ‘Representation and Resemblance’,The Philosophical Forum 7, 499–512.
Schwartz, R.: 1980, ‘Imagery’,Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2, 285–301.
Schwartz, R.: 1985, ‘The Power of Pictures’,The Journal of Philosophy 82, 711–20.
Squires, R.: 1969, ‘Depicting’,Philosophy 44, 193–204.
Walton, K. L.: 1974, ‘Are Representations Symbols?’,The Monist 58, 236–54.
About this article
Cite this article
Scholz, O.R. When is a picture?. Synthese 95, 95–106 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064669
- Specific Question
- Adequate Theory
- Pictorial Representation
- Philosophical Discussion
- Major Motivation