Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 249–287 | Cite as

The impact of gun control and gun ownership levels on violence rates

  • Gary Kleck
  • E. Britt Patterson


What effects do gun control restrictions and gun prevalence have on rates of violence and crime? Data were gathered for all 170 U.S. cities with a 1980 population of at least 100,000. The cities were coded for the presence of 19 major categories of firearms restriction, including both state- and city-level restrictions. Multiple indirect indicators of gun prevalence levels were measured and models of city violence rates were estimated using two-stage least-squares methods. The models covered all major categories of intentional violence and crime which frequently involve guns: homicide, suicide, fatal gun accidents, robbery, and aggravated assaults, as well as rape. Findings indicate that (1) gun prevalence levels generally have no net positive effect on total violence rates, (2) homicide, gun assault, and rape rates increase gun prevalence, (3) gun control restrictions have no net effect on gun prevalence levels, and (4) most gun control restrictions generally have no net effect on violence rates. There were, however, some possible exceptions to this last conclusion—of 108 assessments of effects of different gun laws on different types of violence, 7 indicated good support, and another 11 partial support, for the hypothesis of gun control efficacy.

Key words

gun control violence 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Audit Bureau of Circulations (1979–1982).Supplementary Data Report, covering county paid circulation figures for gun/hunting/outdoor magazines, ABC, Chicago.Google Scholar
  2. Beha, J. (1977). Andnobody can get you out.Boston Univ. Law Rev. 57: 96–146, 289–333.Google Scholar
  3. Bendis, P., and Balkin, S. (1979). A look at gun control enforcement.J. Police Sci. Admin. 7: 439–448.Google Scholar
  4. Berkowitz, L., and LePage, A. (1967). Weapons as aggression-eliciting stimuli.J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 7: 202–207.Google Scholar
  5. Blackman, P. (1985). Carrying handgunus for personal protection. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology, San Diego, CA, Nov. 13–16.Google Scholar
  6. Block, R. (1977).Violent Crime, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  7. Blose, J., and Cook, P. J. (1980).Regulating Handgun Transfers, Duke University, Institute of Policy Sciences and Public Affairs, Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  8. Bordua, D. J. (1986). Firearms ownership and violent crime: A comparison of Illinois counties. In Byrne, J. M., and Sampson, R. J. (eds.),The Social Ecology of Crime, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 156–188.Google Scholar
  9. Bordua, D. J., and Lizotte, A. J. (1979). Patterns of legal firearms ownership.Law Policy Q. 1: 147–175.Google Scholar
  10. Bordua, D. J., Lizotte, A. J., and Kleck, G. (1979).Patterns of Firearms Ownership and Regulation in Illinois, A Report to the Illinois Law Enforcement Commission, Illinois Law Enforcement Commission, Springfield.Google Scholar
  11. Brearley, H. C. (1932).Homicide in the United States, University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
  12. Brill, S. (1977).Firearm Abuse, Police Foundation, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  13. Byrne, J. M. (1986). Cities, citizens, and crime. In Byrne, J. M., and Sampson, R. J. (eds.),The Social Ecology of Crime, Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 77–101.Google Scholar
  14. Cook, P. J. (1976). A strategic choice analysis of robbery. In Skogan, W. (ed.),Sample Surveys of the Victims of Crime, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, pp. 173–187.Google Scholar
  15. Cook, P. J. (1979). The effect of gun availability on robbery and robbery murder. Haveman, R., and Zellner, B. B. (eds.),Policy Studies Review Annual., Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 743–781.Google Scholar
  16. Cook, P. J. (1982). The role of firearms in violent crime. In Wolfgang, M. E., and Werner, N. A. (eds.),Criminal Violence, Sage, Beverly Hills, pp. 236–291.Google Scholar
  17. Cook, P. J., and Blose, J. (1981). State programs for screening handgun buyers.Annals 455: 80–91.Google Scholar
  18. Curtis, L. (1974).Criminal Violence, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Deutsch, S. J., and Alt, F. B. (1977). The effect of Massachusetts' gun control law on gun-related crimes in the city of Boston.Evaluat. Q. 1: 543–568.Google Scholar
  20. DeZee, M. R. (1983). Gun control legislation: Impact and ideology.Law Policy Q. 5: 367–379.Google Scholar
  21. Eskridge, C. W. (1986). Zero-order inverse correlations between crimes of violence and hunting licenses in the United states.Sociol. Soc. Res. 71: 55–57.Google Scholar
  22. Firebaugh, G., and Gibbs, J. P. (1985). User's guide to ratio variables.Am. Sociol. Rev. 50: 713–722.Google Scholar
  23. Gastil, R. D. (1971). Homicide and a regional culture of violence.Am. Sociol. Rev. 36: 412–427.Google Scholar
  24. Geisel, M. S., Roll, R., and Wettick, R. S. (1969). The effectiveness of state and local regulations of handguns.Duke Univ. Law J. 4: 647–676.Google Scholar
  25. Gibbs, J. P., and Erickson, M. L. (1976). Crime rates of American cities in an ecological context.Am. J. Sociol. 82: 605–620.Google Scholar
  26. Hay, R., and McCleary, R. (1979). Box-Tiao time series models for impact assessment.Evaluat. Q. 3: 277–314.Google Scholar
  27. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research (ICPSR) 1983.Uniform Crime Reports: National Time Series Community-level Database, 1967–1980, ICPSR Study 8214 (machine readable dataset), Principal Investigators: Pierce, G. L., Bowers, W. J., Baird, J., and Heck, J. ICPSR, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  28. ICPSR (1984a).Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data, ICPSR Study 9028, Parts 3, 7, 11, 15, Supplementary Homicide Reports, 1979–1982, Federal Bureau of Investigation, ICPSR, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  29. ICPSR (1984b).Uniform Crime Reporting Program Data, ICPSR Study 9028, Parts 2, 6, 14, Property Stolen and Recovered, 1979–1981, Federal Bureau of Investigation, ICPSR, Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, E. D., III (1981). The District of Columbia's “Firearms Control Regulations Act of 1975”,Annals 455: 138–149.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, E. D., and Ray, M. W. (1980).Handgun Control: Strategies, Enforcement and Effectiveness, Unpublished report, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  32. Jung, R. S., and Jason, L. A. (1988). Firearm violence and the effects of gun control legislation.Am. J. Commun. Psychol. 16: 515–524.Google Scholar
  33. Kennedy, P. (1985).A Guide to Econometrics, Basil Blackwell, London.Google Scholar
  34. Kleck, G. (1979). Capital punishment, gun ownership, and homicide.Am. J. Sociol. 84: 882–910.Google Scholar
  35. Kleck, G. (1984a). The relationship between gun ownership levels and rates of violence in the United States. In Kates, D. B., Jr. (ed.),Firearms and Violence: Issues of Public Policy, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA., pp. 99–135.Google Scholar
  36. Kleck, G. (1984b). Handgun-only gun control. In Kates, D. B., Jr. (ed.),Firearms and Violence: Issues of Public Policy, Cambridge, Ballinger, MA, pp. 167–199.Google Scholar
  37. Kleck, G. (1988). Crime control through the private use of armed force.Soc. Problems 35: 1–21.Google Scholar
  38. Kleck, G. (1991).Point Blank: Guns and Violence in America, Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Kleck, G., and McElrath, K. (1991). The effects of weaponry on human violence. Soc.Forces 69: 669–692.Google Scholar
  40. Kleck, G., and DeLone, M. (1993). Victim resistance and offender weapon effects in robbery.J. Quant. Criminol. 9: 55–81.Google Scholar
  41. Krug, A. S. (1967). A statistical study of the relationship between firearms licensing laws and crime rates.Congress. Record 7-25-67, pp. H9366–H9370.Google Scholar
  42. Land, K. C. (1990). Structural covariates of homicide rates.Am. J. Sociol. 95: 922–963.Google Scholar
  43. Lester, D. (1987). An availability-acceptability theory of suicide.Act. Nervosa Super. 29: 164–166.Google Scholar
  44. Lester, D. (1988). Gun control, gun ownership, and suicide prevention.Suicide Life-threat. Behav. 18: 176–180.Google Scholar
  45. Lester, D., and Murrell, M. E. (1981). The relationship between gun control statutes and homicide rates: A research note.Crime Just. 4: 146–148.Google Scholar
  46. Lester, D., and Murrell, M. E. (1982). The preventive effect of strict gun control laws on suicide and homicide.Suicide Life-Threat. Behavior. 12: 131–140.Google Scholar
  47. Lester, D., and Murrell, M. E. (1986). The influence of gun control laws on personal violence.J. Commun. Psychol. 14: 315–318.Google Scholar
  48. Lizotte, A. J., Bordua, D. J., and White, C. S. (1981). Firearms ownership for sport and protection: Two not so divergent models.Am. Sociol. Rev. 46: 499–503.Google Scholar
  49. Loftin, C., Heumann, M., and McDowall, D. (1983). Mandatory sentencing and firearms violence: Evaluating an alternative to gun control.Law Soc. Rev. 17: 287–318.Google Scholar
  50. Loftin, C., and McDowall, D. (1981). “One with a gun gets you two”: Mandatory sentencing and firearms violence in Detroit.Annals 455: 150–167.Google Scholar
  51. Loftin, C., and McDowall, D. (1984). The deterrent effects of the Florida Felony Firearm Law.J. Crim. Law Criminol. 75: 250–259.Google Scholar
  52. Loftin, C., McDowall, D., Wiersema, B., and Cottey, J. (1991). Effects of restrictive licensing of handguns on homicide and suicide in the District of Columbia.N. Engl. J. Med. 325: 1615–1621.Google Scholar
  53. Maddala, G. S. (1988).Introduction to Econometrics, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  54. Magaddino, J. P., and Medoff, M. H. (1982). Homicides, robberies and state “cooling-off” schemes. In Kates, D. B., Jr. (ed.),Why Handgun Bans Can't Work, Second Amendment Foundation, Bellevue, WA.Google Scholar
  55. Magaddino, J. P., and Medoff, M. H. (1984). An empirical analysis of federal and state firearm controls. In Kates, D. B., Jr. (ed.),Firearms and Violence, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  56. McDowall, D. (1986). Gun availability and robbery rates: A panel study of large U.S. cities, 1974–1978.Law & Policy 8: 135–148.Google Scholar
  57. McPheters, L. R., Mann, RT., and Schlagenhauf, D. (1984). Economic response to a crime deterrence program.Econ. Inquiry 22: 550–570.Google Scholar
  58. Murray, D. R. (1975). Handguns, gun control laws and firearm violence.Soc. Problems 23: 81–92.Google Scholar
  59. Newton, G. D., and Zimring, F. E. (1969).Firearms and Violence in American Life: A Staff Report to the National Commission on the Causes and Prevention of Violence, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  60. Nicholson, R., and Garner, A. (1980).The Analysis of the Firearms Control Act of 1975, U.S. Conference of Mayors, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  61. Olin Mathieson Company (1969). Unpublished study summarized by Newton and Zimring (1969, p. 182).Google Scholar
  62. Pierce, G. L., and Bowers, W. J. (1981). The Bartley-Fox gun law's short-term impact on crime in Boston.Annals 455: 120–137.Google Scholar
  63. Quinn, B.,et al. (1982).Churches and Church Membership in the United States, 1980, Glenmary Research Center, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  64. Ronhovde, K. M., and Sugars, G. P. (1982). Survey of select state firearm control laws. In Congressional Research Service,Federal Regulation of Firearms, a report prepared for the Senate Judiciary Committee, pp. 201–228.Google Scholar
  65. Sampson, R. J. (1986). Crime in cities. In Reiss, A. J., Jr., and Tonry, M. (eds.),Communities and Crime, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 271–311.Google Scholar
  66. Scammon, R. M. (ed.) (1972).America Votes, Vol. 10, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar
  67. Seitz, S. T. (1972). Firearms, homicides, and gun control effectiveness.Law Soc. Rev. 6: 595–614.Google Scholar
  68. Shields, D. J. (1976). Two judges look at gun control.Chicago Bar Record 1976: 180–185.Google Scholar
  69. Smith, D. A., and Uchida, C. D. (1988). The social organization of self-help.Am. Sociol. Rev. 3: 94–102.Google Scholar
  70. Sommers, P. M. (1980). Deterrence and gun control: An empirical analysis.Atlantic Econ. J. 8: 89–94.Google Scholar
  71. Sommers, P. M. (1984). Letter to the Editor.N. Engl. J. Med. 310: 47–48.Google Scholar
  72. U.S. Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (BATF) (1980).State Laws and Published Ordinances, Firearms-1980, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  73. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1981).1977 Census of Service Industries—Geographic Area Series—United States, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  74. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1983a).County and City Data Book 1983, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  75. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1983b).1980 Census of the Population, Vol. 1. Characteristics of the Population, Chapter C, General Social and Economic Characteristics, Table 118, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  76. U.S. Bureau of the Census (1986).Statistical Abstract of the United States, 1987, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  77. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1982).Prisoners in State and Federal Institutions on December 31, 1980, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  78. U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics (1987).Criminal Victimization in the United States, 1985, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  79. U.S. Department of Justice (1989). Draft report on systems for identifying felons who attempt to purchase firearms; Notice and request for comments.Fed. Register June 26: 26901–26941.Google Scholar
  80. U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (1980–1982).Crime in the United States, annual issues covering 1979–1981, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  81. U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (1984).Uniform Crime Reporting Handbook, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  82. U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation (undated).AS&R Data by State and County (year), covering each of years 1979–1981, Computer printout supplied by FBI to senior author, reporting arrests for individual reporting police agencies.Google Scholar
  83. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1980).Federal Aid in Fish and Wildlife Restoration, 1980, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  84. U.S. National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) (1983).Public Use Data Tape Documentation: Mortality Detail 1980 Data, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Hyattsville, MD.Google Scholar
  85. Wisconsin (1960).The Regulation of the Firearms by the States, Research Bulletin 130, Wisconsin Legislative Reference Library, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  86. Wright, J. D., and Rossi, P. H. (1986).Armed and Considered Dangerous, Aldine, New York.Google Scholar
  87. Wright, J. D., Rossi, P. H., and Daly, K. (1983).Under the Gun: Weapons, Crime and Violence, Aldine, New York.Google Scholar
  88. Zimring, F. E. (1975). Firearms and federal law: The Gun Control Act of 1968.J. Legal Stud. 4: 133–198.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1993

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Kleck
    • 1
  • E. Britt Patterson
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Criminology and Criminal JusticeThe Florida State UniversityTallahassee
  2. 2.Department of Criminal JusticeShippensburg UniversityShippensburg

Personalised recommendations