Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 85–118 | Cite as

What is a problem that we may solve it?

  • Thomas Nickles
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agassi, Joseph: 1964, ‘The nature of scientific problems and their roots in metaphysics’, in M. Bunge (ed.),The Critical Approach to Science and Philosophy, Free Press, New York, pp. 189–211. Reprinted in Agassi,Science in Flux, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1975, pp. 208–239.Google Scholar
  2. Bantz, David: 1980, ‘The structure of discovery: Evolution of structural accounts of chemical bonding’, in Nickles (1980d), pp. 291–329.Google Scholar
  3. Belnap, Nuel, and Thomas Steel: 1976,The Logic of Questions and Answers, Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  4. Bohr, N., H. A. Kramers, and J. C. Slater: 1924, ‘The quantum theory of radiation’, reprinted in B. L. van der Waerden (ed.),Sources of Quantum Mechanics, Dover, New York, 1968, pp. 159–176.Google Scholar
  5. Boyd, Richard: 1973, ‘Realism, underdetermination, and a causal theory of evidence’,Noûs 7, 1–12.Google Scholar
  6. Bromberger, Sylain: 1966, ‘Why questions’, in R. G. Colodny (ed.),Mind and Cosmos, Univ. of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 86–111.Google Scholar
  7. Brown, Harold: 1975, ‘Problem changes in science and philosophy’,Metaphilosophy 6, 177–192.Google Scholar
  8. Bunge, Mario: 1967,Scientific Research I: The Search for System, Springer-Verlag, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Darden, Lindley: 1976, ‘Reasoning in scientific change: Charles Darwin, Hugo DeVries, and the discovery of segregation’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 7 127–169.Google Scholar
  10. Davidson, Donald: 1967, ‘Truth and meaning’,Synthese 7, 304–323.Google Scholar
  11. Dreyfus, Hubert: 1972,What Computers Can't Do, Harper & Row, New York, 2nd ed., enlarged, 1979.Google Scholar
  12. Finocchiaro, Maurice: 1980, ‘Scientific discoveries as growth of understanding: The case of Newton's gravitation’, in Nickles (1980c), pp. 235–256.Google Scholar
  13. Frankel, Henry: 1980, ‘The importance of anticipating problem solutions in theory choice’,Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research 39, 57–68.Google Scholar
  14. Glymour, Clark: 1980,Theory and Evidence, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  15. Gutting, Gary: 1980, ‘Science as discovery’,Revue Internationale de Philosophie, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  16. Hamblin, C. L.: 1958, ‘Questions’,Australasian Journal of Philosophy 36, 159–168.Google Scholar
  17. Hattiangadi, J. N.: 1978, ‘The structure of problems’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 8, 345–365, and9, 49–71.Google Scholar
  18. Hempel, Carl G.: 1965, ‘Aspects of scientific explanation’, inAspects of Scientific Explanation, Free Press, New York, pp. 331–496.Google Scholar
  19. Klein, M. J.: 1962, ‘Max Planck and the beginnings of the quantum theory’,Archive for History of Exact Sciences 1, 459–479.Google Scholar
  20. Klein, M. J.: 1966, ‘Thermodynamics and quanta in Planck's work’,Physics Today 19, 23–32.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhn, Thomas: 1959, ‘The essential tension’, reprinted in Kuhn (1977), pp. 225–239.Google Scholar
  22. Kuhn, Thomas: 1962,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago. 2nd ed., enlarged, 1970.Google Scholar
  23. Kuhn, Thomas: 1977,The Essential Tension, Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  24. Kuhn, Thomas: 1978,The Black-Body Problem and the Quantum Discontinuity, 1894–1912, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  25. Lakatos, Imre: 1970, ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  26. Laudan, Larry: 1977,Progress and Its Problems, Univ. of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  27. Laudan, Larry: 1980, ‘A refutation of convergent realism’, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  28. Leplin, Jarrett: 1980, ‘The role of models in theory construction’, in Nicles (1980c), pp. 267–284.Google Scholar
  29. Lugg, Andrew: 1978, ‘Overdetermined problems in science’,Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 9, 1–18.Google Scholar
  30. Lugg, Andrew: 1979 ‘Laudan and the problem-solving approach to scientific progress and rationality’,Philosophy of the Social Sciences 9, 466–474.Google Scholar
  31. Matson, Wallace: 1966, ‘Why isn't the mind-body problem ancient?’ in P. Feyerabend and G. Maxwell (eds.),Mind, Matter, and Method, Minnesota Univ. Press, Minneapolis, pp. 92–102.Google Scholar
  32. McMullin, Ernan: 1976, ‘The fertility of theory and the unit for appraisal in science’, in R. S. Cohenet al. (eds.),Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 395–432.Google Scholar
  33. Monk, Robert: 1980, ‘Productive reasoning and the structure of scientific research’, in Nickles (1980c), pp. 337–354.Google Scholar
  34. Nickles, Thomas: 1976, ‘Theory generalization, problem reduction, and the unity of science’, in R. S. Cohenet al. (eds.),PSA 1974, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 33–75.Google Scholar
  35. Nickles, Thomas: 1978, ‘Scientific problems and constraints’, in P. Asquith and I. Hacking (eds.),PSA 1978, Philosophy of Science Assn., East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 134–148.Google Scholar
  36. Nickles, Thomas: 1980a, ‘Scientific discovery and the future of philosophy of science’, in Nickles (1980c), pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
  37. Nickles, Thomas: 1980b, ‘Can scientific constraints be violated rationally?’, in Nickles (1980c), pp. 285–315.Google Scholar
  38. Nickles, Thomas (ed.): 1980c,Scientific Discovery, Logic, and Rationality (Proceedings of the First Leonard Conference, Vol. I), D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  39. Nickles, Thomas (ed.): 1980d,Scientific Discovery: Case Studies (Proceedings of the First Leonard Conference, Vol. II), D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  40. Nickles, Thomas: 1980e, ‘Scientific problems: Three empiricist models’, in R. Gieri and P. Asquith (eds.),PSA 1980, Vol. 1, Philosophy of Science Assn., East Lansing, Michigan, pp. 3–19.Google Scholar
  41. Nickles, Thomas: 1981, ‘Heuristic appraisal, discovery, and justification: Whither philosophy of science?’, forthcoming in the Pittsburgh Series in Philosophy of Science, L. Laudan (ed.).Google Scholar
  42. Polanyi, Michael: 1966,The Tacit Dimension, Doubleday, Garden City, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  43. Popper, Karl: 1972,Objective Knowledge, Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  44. Putnam, Hilary: 1971, ‘On the “corroboration of theories”’, in P. A. Schilpp (ed.),The Philosophy of Karl R. Popper, Open Court, La Salle, Ill, pp. 221–240.Google Scholar
  45. Putnam, Hilary: 1976, ‘What is “realism”?’Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 76, 177–194. See alsoMeaning and the Moral Sciences, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978, Ch. 4.Google Scholar
  46. Reitman, Walter: 1964, ‘Heuristic decision procedures, open constraints, and the nature of ill defined problems’ in M. W. Shelly, II and G. L. Bryan (eds.),Human Judgments and Optimality, John Wiley, New York, pp. 282–314.Google Scholar
  47. Reitman, Walter: 1965,Cognition and Thought, John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  48. Rorty, Richard: 1979,Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  49. Shapere, Dudley: 1969, ‘Notes toward a post-positivistic interpretation of science’, in P. Achinstein and S. Barker (eds.),The Legacy of Logical Positivism, Johns Hopkins Univ. Press, Baltimore, pp. 115–160.Google Scholar
  50. Shapere, Dudley: 1980, ‘The character of scientific change’, in Nickles (1980c), pp. 61–116.Google Scholar
  51. Simon, Herbert, Allen Newell, and J. C. Shaw (1962), ‘The processes of creative thinking,’ in Simon,Models of Thought, Yale, New Haven, 1979, pp. 144–180.Google Scholar
  52. Simon, Herbert: 1976, ‘Discussion: TheMeno paradox’,Philosophy of Science 43, 147–151. Reprinted in Simon (1977), pp. 338–343.Google Scholar
  53. Simon, Herbert: 1977,Models of Discovery and Other Topics in the Methods of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  54. Suppe, Frederick: 1974, ‘The search for philosophical understanding of scientific theories’, in Suppe (ed.),The Structure of Scientific Theories, Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana, pp. 3–241.Google Scholar
  55. Tichý, Pavel: 1978, ‘Questions, answers, and logic’,American Philosophical Quarterly 15, 275–284.Google Scholar
  56. Toulmin, Stephen: 1972,Human Understanding, Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  57. Wartofsky, Marx: 1980, ‘Scientific judgment: Creativity and discovery in scientific thought’, in Nickles (1980d), pp. 1–20.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thomas Nickles
    • 1
  1. 1.University of NevadaReno

Personalised recommendations