Advertisement

Synthese

, Volume 49, Issue 3, pp 375–394 | Cite as

Theories, catalogues, and languages

  • H. -C. Hung
Article
  • 26 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    Feyerabend, P. K. ‘Explanation, reduction, and empiricism’. In H. Feigl and G. Maxwell (eds.)Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, III. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962. pp. 28–97.Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    Harré, R. and Madden, E. H.Casual Powers. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1975.Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Hempel, C. G. ‘The theoretician's dilemma’. In H. Feigl, M. Scriven, and G. Maxwell (eds.)Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, II. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1958. pp. 37–98.Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    Hempel, C. G.Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall, 1966.Google Scholar
  5. [5]
    Hung, H.-C. ‘Scientific explanation or deceptive explanation?’Methodology and Science 11 (1978): 191–204.Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    Lakatos, I. ‘Changes in the problem of inductive logic’, In I. Lakatos (ed.)The Problem of Inductive Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1968. pp. 315–417.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    Lakatos, I. ‘Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes.’ In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrave (eds.)Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1970. pp. 91–196.Google Scholar
  8. [8]
    Sneed, J. D.The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics. New York: Humanities Press, 1971.Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    Stegmüller, W.The Structure and Dynamics of Theories. New York: Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1976.Google Scholar
  10. [10]
    Wittgenstein, L.Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1961.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© D. Reidel Publishing Co. 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. -C. Hung
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WaikatoNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations