Synthese

, Volume 105, Issue 1, pp 53–86

Noemata and their formalization

  • Wojciech Krysztofiak
Article

Abstract

The presentation of the formal conception of noemata is the main aim of the article. In the first section, three informal approaches to noemata are discussed. The goal of this chapter is specifying main controversies and their sources concerned with different ways of the understanding of noemata. In the second section, basic assumptions determining the proposed way of understanding noemata are presented. The third section is devoted to the formal set-theoretic construction needed for the formal comprehension of noemata. In the fourth section, definitions of noemata and their various kinds, as well as definitions of other phenomenological notions are formulated. In the last section, possibilities of further developing the proposed formal conception are indicated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barwise, Jon and John Perry: 1983,Situations and Attitudes The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  2. Drummond, John J.: 1990,Husserlian Intentionality and Non-Foundational Realism.Noema and Object, Contributions to Phenomenology 4, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  3. Drummond, John J. and Lester Embree (eds.): 1992,The Phenomenology of the Noema, Contributions to Phenomenology, Vol. 10, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Føllesdal, Dagfinn: 1969, ‘Husserl's Notion of Noema’,The Journal of Philosophy 66, 680–7.Google Scholar
  5. Føllesdal, Dagfinn: 1972, ‘An Introduction to Phenomenology for Analytic Philosophers’, in: Raymond E. Olson and Anthony M. Paul (eds.),Contemporary Philosophy in Scandinavia John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, pp. 417–29.Google Scholar
  6. Føllesdal, Dagfinn: 1976, ‘Husserl's Theory of Perception’,Ajatus 36, 95–105.Google Scholar
  7. Føllesdal, Dagfinn: 1978, ‘Brentano and Husserl on Intentional Objects and Perception’,Grazer Philosophische Studien 5, 83–94.Google Scholar
  8. Gale, Richard: 1976,Negation and Non-being, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  9. Gurwitsch, Aron: 1967a, ‘Husserl's Theory of the Intentionality of Consciousness in Historical Perspective’, in E. N. Lee and M. Mandelbaum (eds.),Phenomenology and Existentialism The John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp. 25–57.Google Scholar
  10. Gurwitsch, Aron: 1967b, ‘On the Intentionality of Consciousness’, in J. Kockelmans (ed.);Phenomenology Doubleday, Garden City, N.Y., pp. 118–37.Google Scholar
  11. Harvey, Charles W.: 1987, ‘Husserl's Phenomenology and Possible Worlds Semantics: A Reexamination’,Husserl Studies 3, 191–207.Google Scholar
  12. Harvey, Charles W. and Jaakko Hintikka: 1991, ‘Modalization and Modalities’, in T. M. Seebohm, D. Føllesdal, J. N. Mohanty (eds.),Phenomenology and the Formal Sciences Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 59–78.Google Scholar
  13. Husserl, Edmund: 1973,Experience and Judgment (translated by J. S. Churchill and K. Ameriks), Northwestern University Press, Evanston, Il.Google Scholar
  14. Husserl, Edmund: 1982,Ideas I, (translated by F. Kersten), Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
  15. Krysztofiak, Wojciech: 1992, ‘Phenomenology, Possible Worlds and Negation’,Husserl Studies 8, 205–20.Google Scholar
  16. Küng, Guido: 1972, ‘The World as Noema and as Referent’,Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 3, 15–26.Google Scholar
  17. Mano, Daniel: 1992, ‘A Bibliography of the Noema’, in Drummond and Embree (eds.).Google Scholar
  18. Moneta, Giuseppina Chiara: 1976,On Identity. A Study in Genetic Phenomenology, Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
  19. Murphy, Richard: 1980,Hume and Husserl. Towards Radical Subjectivism Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
  20. Paśniczek, Jacek: 1987, ‘Dwie teorie intencjonalności’ (“Two theories of intentionality” — in Polish),Studia Filozoficzne 1987, (1), 19–32.Google Scholar
  21. Seebohm, Thomas M., Dagfinn Føllesdal and Jitendra N. Mohanty (eds.): 1991,Phenomenology and the Formal Sciences, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  22. Smith, Barry, Kevin Mulligan and Peter Simons: 1984, ‘Truth-Makers’,Philosophy and Phenomenological Research XLIV(3), 287–321.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, Barry and Kevin Mulligan: 1983, ‘Framework for Formal Ontology’,Topoi 2, 73–85.Google Scholar
  24. Smith, David W. and Ronald McIntyre: 1975, ‘Husserl's Identification of Meaning and Noema’,The Monist 59, 111–32.Google Scholar
  25. Smith, David W. and Ronald McIntyre: 1982,Husserl and Intentionality: A Study of Mind, Meaning, and Language D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  26. Smith, David W.: 1983, ‘Husserl's Philosophy of Mind’, inContemporary Philosophy: A New Survey 4, 249–86.Google Scholar
  27. Sokolowski, Robert: 1984, ‘Intentional Analysis and the Noema’,Dialectica 38(2–3), 113–29.Google Scholar
  28. Sokolowski, Robert: 1987, ‘Husserl and Frege’,The Journal of Philosophy LXXXIV(10), 521–8.Google Scholar
  29. Welton, Donn: 1983,The Origins of Meaning: A Critical Study of the Tresholds of Husserlian Phenomenology Martinus Nijhoff, The Hague.Google Scholar
  30. Willard, Dallas: 1982, ‘Wholes, Parts and the Objectivity of Knowledge’, in B. Smith (ed.):Parts and Moments: Studies in Logic and Formal Ontology Philosophia: Munich, pp. 379–400.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wojciech Krysztofiak
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Szczecin, PolandSzczecinPoland

Personalised recommendations