Neurophysiology

, Volume 9, Issue 4, pp 332–337 | Cite as

Effect of imidazole, guanidine, and theophylline on transmitter release in the frog neuromuscular synapse in relation to temperature and calcium ion concentration in the medium

  • I. M. Gotgil'f
Article
  • 16 Downloads

Abstract

The effects of imidazole, guanidine, and theophylline on spontaneous (frequency of miniature end-plate potentials) and evoked (quantum composition of end-plate potentials) transmitter release were compared in isolated sartorius muscles ofRana temporaria at different temperatures and during changes in the calcium concentration in the external solution. All three substances increased the quantum composition of the end-plate potentials and the frequency of the miniature end-plate potentials at 20°C and in 0.5 mM calcium. As regards their effect on the quantum composition the substances could be arranged in the following order: imidazole ≈ guanidine ≫ theophylline; as regards their effect on frequency: theophylline ≫ imidazole ≈ guanidine. Theophylline increased spontaneous release, whereas imidazole and guanidine increased evoked transmitter release more than the rest. Comparison of the effect of these substances at 20 and 7°C showed that only the action of theophylline on spontaneous release depends on temperature. The effect of imidazole and theophylline on frequency was independent of the calcium concentration in the medium. Differences in the mechanism of action of these compounds on spontaneous and evoked acetylcholine release are discussed.

Keywords

Imidazole Acetylcholine Theophylline Calcium Concentration Guanidine 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    I. M. Gotgil'f, "Effect of imidazole compounds on neuromuscular synapses with a change in pH of the medium," Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,206, 733 (1972).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    I. M. Gotgil'f, L. G. Magazanik, and S. E. Severin, "Mechanism of the facilitatory action of imidazole compounds on synaptic transmission," Abstracts of Scientific Proceedings of the 6th All-Union Conference on Neurochemistry [in Russian], Izd. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Leningrad (1972), p. 47.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. A. Kamenskaya, "Modern views on the mechanism of quantal transmitter release from motor nerve endings of skeletal muscle," Usp. Fiziol. Nauk,3, 22 (1972).Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    V. Ya. Lunts, "Effect of imidazole compounds on activity of cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase," Byull. Éksp. Biol. Med.,82, 1055 (1976).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. P. Matyushkin and I. A. Shabunova, "The effect of imidazole on the nerve conductor and transmission of excitation in the neuromuscular junction (in connection with the hypothesis of the existence of chemical feedback in the synapse)," Vestn. Leningrad. Univ., No. 9/2, 97 (1972).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    G. I. Poletaev, "On the mechanism of action of imidazole on the function of neuromuscular junctions in frogs," Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,56, 64 (1970).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. E. Severin, A. A. Boldyrev, and V. B. Petukhov, "On the presynaptic effect of imidazole and carnosine," Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,194, 471 (1970).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    E. Alnaes and R. Rahamimoff, "On the role of mitochondria in transmitter release from motor nerve terminals," J. Physiol. (London),248, 285 (1975).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    P. F. Baker, "Transport and metabolism of calcium ions in nerve," Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.,24, 177 (1972).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    P. R. Benoit and P. Mambrini, "Modification of transmitter release by ions which prolong the presynaptic action potential," J. Physiol. (London),210, 681 (1970).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R. W. Butcher and E. W. Sutherland, "Adenosine-3′, 5′-phosphate in biological materials. I. Purification and properties of cyclic 3′,5′-nucleotide phosphodiesterase and use of this enzyme to characterize adenosine-3′,5′-phosphate in human urine," J. Biol. Chem.,237, 1244 (1962).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    F. A. Dodge and R. Rahmimoff, "Cooperative action of calcium ions in transmitter release at the neuromuscular junction," J. Physiol. (London),193, 419 (1967).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    A. L. Goldberg and J. J. Singer, "Evidence for a role of cyclic AMP in neuromuscular transmission," Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA,64, 134 (1969).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    W. W. Hofmann, R. L. Parsons, and G. A. Feigen, "Effects of temperature and drugs on mammalian motor nerve terminals," Am. J. Physiol.,211, 135 (1966).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    J. I. Hubbard, "The effect of calcium and magnesium on the spontaneous release of transmitter from mammalian motor nerve endings," J. Physiol. (London),159, 507 (1961).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    J. I. Hubbard, "Mechanism of transmitter release," Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol.,21, 33 (1970).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    D. W. Jensen, "The effect of temperature on transmission at the neuromuscular junction of the sartorius muscle ofRana pipiens," Comp. Biochem. Physiol.,41, 685 (1972).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    M. A. Kamenskaya, D. Elmqvist, and S. Thesleff, "Guanidine and neuromuscular transmission. I. Effect on transmitter release occurring spontaneously and in response to single nerve stimuli," Arch. Neurol.,32, 505 (1975).Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    B. Katz and R. Miledi, "The effect of calcium on acetylcholine release from motor nerve terminals," Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser. B,161, 496 (1965).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    B. Katz and R. Miledi, "The release of acetylcholine from nerve endings by graded electric pulses," Proc. R. Soc. London, Ser, B,167, 23 (1967).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    N. L. Katz and C. Edwards, "Effect of metabolic inhibitors on spontaneous and neurally evoked transmitter release from frog motor nerve terminals," J. Gen. Physiol.,61, 259 (1973).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    H. Kita and W. Van der Kloot, "Action of Co and Ni at the frog neuromuscular junction," Nature (London) New Biol.,245, 52 (1973).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    E. M. Landau and D. A. Nachshen, "The interaction of pH and divalent cations at the neuromuscular junction," J. Physiol. (London),251, 775 (1975).Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    C.-L. Li and P. Gouras, "Effect of cooling on neuromuscular transmission in the frog," Am. J. Physiol.192, 464 (1958).Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    J. Mambrini, P. R. Benoit, and P. H. Benoit, "Action du calcium sur la jonction neuro-musculaire chez la Grenouille," C. R. Soc. Biol.,158, 1454 (1964).Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    R. S. Manalis and G. P. Cooper, "Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of lead at the frog neuromuscular junction," Nature (London),243, 354 (1973).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    A. R. Martin, "Quantal components of synaptic transmission," Physiol. Rev.,46, 51 (1966).Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    M. Otsuka, and M. Endo, "The effect of guanidine on neuromuscular transmission," J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,128, 273 (1960).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    H. Takeuchi, "The effect of temperature on the neuromuscular junction of the frog," Jpn. J. Physiol.,8, No. 2, 390 (1958).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    H. Teräväinen and A. Larsen, "Effect of guanidine on quantal release of acetylcholine in the mammalian myoneural junction," Exp. Neurol.,48, 601 (1975).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    D. F. Wilson, "The effect of dibutyryl cyclic adenosine-3′,5′-monophosphate, theophylline, and aminophylline on neuromuscular transmission in the rat," J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.,188, 447 (1974).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1978

Authors and Affiliations

  • I. M. Gotgil'f

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations