Initial and residual effects of nitrogen fertilizers on grain yield of a maize/bean intercrop grown on a Humic Nitosol and the fate and efficiency of the applied nitrogen
Abstract
Initial and residual effects of nitrogen (N) fertilizers on grain yield of a maize/bean intercrop grown on a deep, well-drained Humic Nitosol (66% clay, 3% organic carbon) were evaluated. Enriched (15N) N fertilizer was used to study the fate of applied N in two seasons: using urea (banded) at 50 kg N ha−1 in one season, and15N-enriched urea (banded), calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN, banded), and urea supergranules (USG, point placement) were applied in the other season (different field) at 100 kg N ha−1. Nitrogen fertilizer significantly (P = 0.05) increased equivalent maize grain yield in each season of application with no significant differences between N sources, i.e., urea, CAN, and USG. Profitmaximizing rates ranged from 75 to 97 kg N ha−1 and value: cost ratios ranged from 3.0 to 4.8. Urea gave the highest value: cost ratio in each season. Most (lowest measurement 81%) of the applied N was accounted for by analyzing the soil (to 150 cm depth) and plant material. Measurements for urea, CAN, and USG were not significantly different. The high N measurements suggest low losses of applied N fertilizer under the conditions of the study. Maize plant recovery ranged from 35 to 55%; most of this N (51–65%) was in the grain. Bean plant recovery ranged from 8 to 20%. About 34–43% of the applied N fertilizer remained in the soil, and most of it (about 70%) was within the top soil layer (0–30 cm). However, there were no significant equivalent maize grain increases in seasons following N application indicating no beneficial residual effect of the applied fertilizers.
Key words
Calcium ammonium nitrate (CAN) urea urea supergranules (USG) nitrogen balance 15N studies nitrogen placement nitrogen efficiencyPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Bationo A, Christianson CB and Mokwunye AU (1987) Soil fertility management of the millet-producing sandy soils of Sahelian West Africa: The Niger experience. Paper presented at the Workshop in Soil and Crop Management Systems for Rainfed Agriculture in Sudano-Sahelian Zone, Niamey, Niger, January 11–16, 1987Google Scholar
- 2.Buresh RJ, Austin ER and Craswell ET (1982) Analytical methods in15N research. Fertilizer Research 3: 37–62Google Scholar
- 3.Freney JR and Black AS (1988) Importance of ammonia volatilization as a loss process. In Wilson JR (ed) Advances in Nitrogen Cycling in Agricultural Ecosystems, pp 156–173, CAB International, UKGoogle Scholar
- 4.Laycock D and Allan AY (1976) Maize Agronomy Research Project, Kitale Final Report, Part II, Vol. I. Ministry of Agriculture, Kenya and Ministry of Overseas Development, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
- 5.McCarthy FD and Mwangi WM (1982) Kenya Agriculture: Toward 2000. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, AustriaGoogle Scholar
- 6.Lenga FK (1979) Water use by eight annual crops at Kabete 1978/79, M.Sc. Thesis, Department of Soil Science, University of NairobiGoogle Scholar
- 7.Mughogho SK, Bationo A, Christianson B and Vlek PLG (1986) Management of nitrogen fertilizers for tropical African soils. In Mokwunye AU and Vlek PLG (eds) Management of Nitrogen and Phosphorus Fertilizers in Sub-Saharan Africa, pp 117–172, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
- 8.Nielsen DR, Biggar JW, MacIntyre J and Tanji KK (1980) Field investigations of water and nitrate-nitrogen movement in Yolo Soil. In Soil Nitrogen as Fertilizer or Pollutant, pp 145–168. Proceedings of a Research Coordinating Meeting held in Paracicaba, Brazil, 3–7 July 1978. International Atomic Energy Agency, ViennaGoogle Scholar
- 9.Siderius W (1976) Environment and characteristics of the Nitosol at N.A.L., Kenya Soil Survey, Miscellaneous Soil Paper No 10Google Scholar
- 10.Vadlamudi Rao Y and Thimm HU (1974) Economic analysis of fertilizer trials conducted in Kenya on maize. EA Agric for J 40: 189–201Google Scholar