Advertisement

Neurophysiology

, Volume 4, Issue 3, pp 194–199 | Cite as

After-effects of anodal polarization in the cat cerebral cortex

  • F. A. Brazovskaya
  • A. K. Malikova
  • R. A. Pavlygina
Article

Abstract

Functional changes in neurons and their glial satellites in the cat motor cortex were studied after surface de polarization. An increase in the frequency of spontaneous and evoked unit activity in deep layers of the cortex was demonstrated by a microelectrode method and shown to continue for 0.5 h after the end of polarization. Layer by layer investigation of the cortex by cytophotometry using visible light of two wavelengths on sections stained with gallocyanin and chrome alum revealed an increase in the number of reactive phosphate groups of nucleic acids after polarization for 15 min and a decrease in their content 20 min after the end of polarization in pyramidal neurons of layer V, followed by an increase in the interneurons of this layer after 75 min. The number of glial satellites in the same layer was increased near the pyramidal neurons 20 min after the end of polarization and near the interneurons 75 min after its end. In layers II, III, and VI no statistically significant changes in these indices could be found. The results show that the cell population activated by surface polarization is formed of neurons in layer V. Prolonged activation of interneurons and their distinguishing structural features are considered to reflect their organizing role in trace processes.

Keywords

Motor Cortex Pyramidal Neuron Phosphate Group Surface Polarization Unit Activity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature cited

  1. 1.
    L. S. Agroskin, V. Ya. Brodskii, A. D. Gruzdev, and N. V. Korolev, “Some aspects of quantitative spectrophotometric analysis of the cell”, Tsitologiya,2, 337 (1960).Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    M. M. Aleksandrovskaya, Yu. Ya. Geinisman, and V. N. Mats, “Glio-neuronal relationships during intensified neuronal function as shown by morphological investigation”, Zh. Nevropat. i Psikhiat.,65, 161 (1965).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    M. M. Aleksandrovskaya, F. A. Brazovskaya, Yu. Ya. Geinisman, P. B. Kazakova, V. N. Larina, and V. N. Mats, “Morphological changes in the neuroglia during intensified function of nerve centers”, Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSR,180, 719 (1968).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. N. Baranov and L. Z. Pevzner, “Content of nucleic acids in the superior cervical sympathetic ganglion under normal and excited conditions”, Biokhimiya,28, 958 (1963).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. Ya. Brodskii, Cell Nutrition [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1966).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    V. Ya. Brodskii and N. V. Nechaeva, “Quantitative cytochemical investigation of RNA in retinal ganglion cells during normal function and fatigue”, Biofizika,3, 269 (1958).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu. Ya. Geinisman, V. N. Larina, V. N. Mats, T. S. Mikheeva, and I. I. Persina, “Techniques for the investigation of changes in the size of nerve cells”, in: Modern Methods of Brain Investigation [in Russian], Izd. Akad. Med. Nauk SSSR, Moscow (1969), pp. 30–35.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    P. I. Kalinin, Effect of Polarization of Specific and Nonspecific Subcortical Structures on a Cortical Dominant [in Russian], Author's Abstract of Candidate's Dissertation, Moscow (1965).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    L. A. Novikova, V. S. Rusinov, and A. F. Semiokhina, “Electrophysiological analysis of conditioning in the rabbit cerebral cortex”, Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat.,2, 844 (1952).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. A. Pavlygina and A. K. Malikova, “Unit spike discharges and the direct cortical response in cats”, Fiziol. Zh. SSSR,54, 989 (1968).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    G. I. Polyakov, “Relationships between the principal types of neurons in the human cerebral cortex”, Zh. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat.,6, 469 (1956).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    V. S. Rusinov, “Electrophysiological analysis of conditioning functions in the cerebral cortex in the presence of a dominant focus”, Proceedings of the 19th International Physiological Congress [in Russian], Moscow (1953), pp. 147–151.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    M. A. Ryabinina, “The importance of different layers of the cerebral cortex in the formation of a dominant focus by means of a direct current”, Trudy Inst. Vyssh. Nervn. Deyat.i Neirofiz. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Seriya Fiziol.,6, 211 (1961).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    D. S. Saudergene and L. Z. Pevzner, “Cytophotometric analysis of nucleic acid and protein metabolism in motor and sensory neurons of the spinal cord and their neuroglia during leptazol convulsions”, Tsitologiya,11, 1275 (1969).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. A. Sokolova, Cortical and Subcortical Electrical Activity in the Rabbit in the Presence of a Dominant Focus in the Cerebral Cortex [in Russian], Author's Abstract of Candidate's Dissertation, Moscow (1954).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. A. Utina, “Investigation of the activity of two types of bipolar cells by UV cytophotometry”, Biofizika,5, 626 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    E. G. Shkol'nik-Yarros, Neurons and Interneuronal Connections [in Russian], Nauka, Leningrad (1965).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    J. Altman, “Postnatal growth and differentiation of the mammalian brain with implications for morphological theory of memory”, in: The Neurosciences, A Study Program, New York (1967), pp. 723–743.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    P. S. Geiger, “Subcultures of adult mammalian brain cortex in vitro”, Exper. Cell Res.,14, 541 (1958).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    H. Hyden and A. Pigon, “A cytochemical study of the functional relationship between oligodendroglial cells and nerve cells of Deiters' nucleus”, J. Neurochem.,6, 57 (1960).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    H. Kulenkampff, “Das Verhalten der Neuroglia in den Vorderhörchern des Rückenmarks der weissen Maus unter dem Reiz physiologischer Tätigkeit”, Z. Anat. Entw.-Gesch.,116, 304 (1952).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    M. L. Mendelsohn, “The two-wavelength method of microphotospectrometry. II. A set of tables to facilitate the calculation”, J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol.,4, 415 (1958).PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    J. L. Young, A Model of the Brain, Oxford (1964).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Consultants Bureau 1973

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. A. Brazovskaya
  • A. K. Malikova
  • R. A. Pavlygina

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations