Journal of Quantitative Criminology

, Volume 4, Issue 2, pp 137–153 | Cite as

Vigilantism as community social control: Developing a quantitative criminological model

  • David Weisburd


This paper presents the first systematic quantitative examination of participation in vigilante behavior. Data collected as part of a larger study of Jewish settler violence in the Israeli-controlled West Bank region are used to analyze the factors that lead members of a community to become involved in vigilante violence. Using logistic regression techniques it is found that settlers who fulfill requirements of the vigilante role and those located in outposts where the demand for vigilantes is greatest are most likely to be involved in vigilante activities. In conclusion, it is argued that these findings provide strong support for a criminological model of vigilante behavior that emphasizes the role of the vigilante as an agent of community social control.

Key words

vigilantism criminal social control social control logit regression West Bank Jewish settlers 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amann, P. H. (1983). Vigilante Fascism: The Black Legion as an American hybrid.Comp. Study Soc. Hist. 25: 490–524.Google Scholar
  2. Avruch, K. A. (1979). Gush Emunim: Politics, religion and ideology in Israel.Middle East Rev. 11: 26–31.Google Scholar
  3. Black, D. (1983). Crime as social control.Am. Sociol. Rev. 48: 34–45.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, R. M. (1971). Legal and behavioral perspectives on American vigilantism.Perspect. Am. Hist. 5: 106–116.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, R. M. (1975).Strain of Violence: Historical Studies of American Violence and Vigilantism, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, R. M. (1976). The history of vigilantism in America. In Rosenbaum, H., and Sederberg, P. (eds.),Vigilante Politics, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 79–109.Google Scholar
  7. Caughey, J. W. (1957). Their majesties the mob: Vigilantes past and present.Pacif. Hist. Rev. 26: 217–234.Google Scholar
  8. Friedman, T. (1987). My neighbor, my enemy: A report from Israel.N.Y. Times Mag. July 5: 14–42.Google Scholar
  9. Gitlitz, J. S., and Rojas, T. (1983). Peasant vigilante committees in northern Peru.J. Latin Am. Stud. 15: 163–197.Google Scholar
  10. Griffiths, J. (1984). The division of labor in social control. In Black, D. (ed.),Toward a General Theory of Social Control, Vol. 1, Academic Press, New York, pp. 37–70.Google Scholar
  11. Hanushek, E., and Jackson, J. (1977).Statistical Methods for Social Scientists, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Kenney, D. (1986). Crime on the subways: Measures of the effectiveness of the Guardian Angels.Just. Q. 3.Google Scholar
  13. Kotecha, K. C., and Walker, J. L. (1976). Police vigilantes.Society 13(3): 48–52.Google Scholar
  14. Kreml, W. P. (1976). The vigilante personality. In Rosenbaum, H., and Sederberg, P. (eds.),Vigilante Politics, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 45–63.Google Scholar
  15. Lebow, R. N. (1976). Vigilantism in Northern Ireland. In Rosenbaum, H., and Sederberg, P. (eds.),Vigilante Politics, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 234–258.Google Scholar
  16. Little, C. B., and Sheffield, C. (1983). Frontiers and criminal justice: English private prosecution societies and American vigilantism in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.Am. Sociol. Rev. 48: 796–808.Google Scholar
  17. Lustick, I. S. (1987). Israel's dangerous fundamentalists.Foreign Policy Nov.: 118–139.Google Scholar
  18. Marx, G. T., and Archer, D. (1986). Community police patrols and vigilantism. InVigilante Politics, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 129–157.Google Scholar
  19. McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice and behavior. In Zarembka, P. (ed.),Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Nerlove, M., and Press, S. J. (1973).Univariate and Multivariate Loglinear and Logistic Models, Rand Corp., Santa Monica, Calif.Google Scholar
  21. Oberschall, A. (1973).Social Conflict and Social Movements, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar
  22. Odea, J. (1976). Gush Emunim: Roots and ambiguities.Forum 2: 39–50.Google Scholar
  23. Parsons, T. (1951).The Social System, Collier Macmillan, Toronto.Google Scholar
  24. Potholm, C. P. (1976). Comparative vigilantism: The United States and South Africa. In Rosenbaum, H., and Sederberg, P. (eds.),Vigilante Politics, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 175–193.Google Scholar
  25. Reich, W. (1984).A Stranger in My House, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Rosenbaum, H. J., and Sederberg, P. (1976). Vigilantism: An analysis of establishment violence. In Rosenbaum, H., and Sederberg, P. (eds.),Vigilante Politics, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
  27. Rubinstein, D. (1982).On the Lord's Side: Gush Emunim, Workers Press, Tel Aviv.Google Scholar
  28. Sederberg, P. (1978). The phenomenology of vigilantism in contemporary America.Terror. Int. J. 1: 287–303.Google Scholar
  29. Shipler, D. (1987).Arab and Jew: Wounded Spirits in the Promised Land, Times Books, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Shotland, R. L. (1976). Spontaneous vigilantes.Society 13(3): 30–32.Google Scholar
  31. Skolnick, J. H. (1969).The Politics of Protest, Ballantine Books, New York.Google Scholar
  32. Sprinzak, E. (1981). Gush Emunim: The tip of the iceberg.Jerusalem Q. 21: 28–47.Google Scholar
  33. Stone, T. (1979). The mounties as vigilantes: Perceptions of community and the transformation of law in the Yukon, 1885–1897.Law Soc. Rev. 14: 83–114.Google Scholar
  34. Tucker, W. (1985).Vigilante: The Backlash Against Crime in America, Stein and Day, New York.Google Scholar
  35. Weisburd, D. (1984). Vigilantism as rational social control: The case of the Gush Emunim settlers.Polit. Anthropol. 4: 69–87 (with Vered Vinitzky).Google Scholar
  36. Weisburd, D. (1988a). Potential anti-government violence by Jewish settlers in the West Bank: The constraints of social networks. In Cromer, G. (ed.),Studies in Violence, Bar Ilan University Press, Tel Aviv.Google Scholar
  37. Weisburd, D. (1988b).Jewish Settler Violence in the Land of Israel: Deviance as Social Reaction, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park (in press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 1988

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Weisburd
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Criminal JusticeRutgers UniversityNewark

Personalised recommendations